meta data for this page
  •  

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
sector:ippu:bulk_products:handling_of_bulk_products:start [2021/04/14 07:53] kotzullasector:ippu:bulk_products:handling_of_bulk_products:start [2022/09/22 11:46] (current) – Fix links tarakji
Line 15: Line 15:
 Official statistics are of limited use in determining handling of bulk products. There are only transport statistics available providing the amounts of several transported materials. Official statistics are of limited use in determining handling of bulk products. There are only transport statistics available providing the amounts of several transported materials.
  
-During a research project carried out by (Müller-BBM) [((bibcite 1))], activity data was derived from primary statistical data from the Federal Statistical Office for Germany (Satistisches Bundesamt, Destatis) and the Federal Motor Transport Authority (Kraftfahrt-Bundesamt, KBA). Here, data on goods transported by railways and ships is gathered by Destatis whereas data for road transport is collected by the KBA.+During a research project carried out by (Müller-BBM) [(MÜLLERBBM2011)], activity data was derived from primary statistical data from the Federal Statistical Office for Germany (Satistisches Bundesamt, Destatis) and the Federal Motor Transport Authority (Kraftfahrt-Bundesamt, KBA). Here, data on goods transported by railways and ships is gathered by Destatis whereas data for road transport is collected by the KBA.
  
-Here, for all years until 2009, the collection of data for transported goods followed the official **NST/R** (1968) **nomenclature and regulation** (Eurostat, 2014a) [((bibcite 2))]. +Here, for all years until 2009, the collection of data for transported goods followed the official **NST/R** (1968) **nomenclature and regulation** (Eurostat, 2015a) [(EUROSTAT2015a)]. 
  
-As of 2010, statistical data following the newly implemented **NST-2007** [((bibcite 3))], [((bibcite 4))] **nomenclature and regulation** from Destatis and KBA is applied instead.+As of 2010, statistical data following the newly implemented **NST-2007** [(EUROSTAT2015b)], [(DESTATIS2013)] **nomenclature and regulation** from Destatis and KBA is applied instead.
  
 __Table 1: Overview of primary activity data sources over time__ __Table 1: Overview of primary activity data sources over time__
Line 126: Line 126:
 === Emission factors === === Emission factors ===
  
-Emission factors are based on the methodology according VDI guidelines 3790. The values used here originate from a research project by (Müller-BBM, 2011) [((bibcite 1))] taking into account information of an expert panel of industry and administration. For details see the [*https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/publikationen/konsistenzpruefung-verbesserungspotenzial project report] (German version only).+Emission factors are based on the methodology according VDI guidelines 3790. The values used here originate from a research project by (Müller-BBM, 2011) [(MÜLLERBBM2011)] taking into account information of an expert panel of industry and administration. For details see the [*https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/publikationen/konsistenzpruefung-verbesserungspotenzial project report] (German version only).
  
 Within the study, PM emission factors are estimated for each material or good that might be transported as dry and unpacked bulk. These very specific EF are than assigned to the classes of materials/goods available from the different different statistics (NST/R, NST-2007) to form implied Ef for these class of bulk material. Within the study, PM emission factors are estimated for each material or good that might be transported as dry and unpacked bulk. These very specific EF are than assigned to the classes of materials/goods available from the different different statistics (NST/R, NST-2007) to form implied Ef for these class of bulk material.
Line 133: Line 133:
  
 __Table 2: specific EF for PM emissions from NST/R crop products, in [kg/t], as used for 2009 estimates__ __Table 2: specific EF for PM emissions from NST/R crop products, in [kg/t], as used for 2009 estimates__
-||= **vehicle type** ||= **TSP** ||= **PM,,10,,** ||= **PM,,2.5,,** ||= + 
-||||||||= **for barley** || +                     ^  TSP     PM10    PM2.5   ^ 
-||< inland ship ||> 0.038 ||> 0.019 ||> 0.004 ||> + for barley                                      |||| 
-||< railway ||> 0.038 ||> 0.019 ||> 0.004 ||> +inland ship           0.038   0.019     0.004 | 
-||< maritime ship ||> 0.038 ||> 0.019 ||> 0.0038 ||> +railway               0.038   0.019     0.004 | 
-||< heavy-duty vehicle ||> 0.038 ||> 0.019 ||> 0.004 ||> +maritime ship         0.038   0.019    0.0038 | 
-||||||||= **for oats** || +heavy-duty vehicle    0.038   0.019     0.004 | 
-||< inland ship ||> 0.018 ||> 0.009 ||> 0.002 ||> + for oats                                        |||| 
-||< railway ||> 0.018 ||> 0.009 ||> 0.002 ||> +inland ship           0.018   0.009     0.002 | 
-||< maritime ship ||> 0.018 ||> 0.009 ||> 0.00179 ||> +railway               0.018   0.009     0.002 | 
-||< heavy-duty vehicle ||> 0.018 ||> 0.009 ||> 0.002 ||> +maritime ship         0.018   0.009   0.00179 | 
-||||||||= **for corn** || +heavy-duty vehicle    0.018   0.009     0.002 | 
-||< inland ship ||> 0.029 ||> 0.014 ||> 0.003 ||> + for corn                                        |||| 
-||< railway ||> 0.029 ||> 0.014 ||> 0.003 ||> +inland ship           0.029   0.014     0.003 | 
-||< maritime ship ||> 0.029 ||> 0.014 ||> 0.00287 ||> +railway               0.029   0.014     0.003 | 
-||< heavy-duty vehicle ||> 0.029 ||> 0.014 ||> 0.003 ||> +maritime ship         0.029   0.014   0.00287 | 
-||||||||= **for rice** || +heavy-duty vehicle    0.029   0.014     0.003 | 
-||< inland ship ||> 0.015 ||> 0.008 ||> 0.002 ||> + for rice                                        |||| 
-||< railway ||> 0.015 ||> 0.008 ||> 0.002 ||> +inland ship           0.015   0.008     0.002 | 
-||< maritime ship ||> 0.015 ||> 0.008 ||> 0.00151 ||> +railway               0.015   0.008     0.002 | 
-||< heavy-duty vehicle ||> 0.015 ||> 0.008 ||> 0.002 ||> +maritime ship         0.015   0.008   0.00151 | 
-||||||||= **for rye** || +heavy-duty vehicle    0.015   0.008     0.002 | 
-||< inland ship ||> 0.038 ||> 0.019 ||> 0.004 ||> + for rye                                         |||| 
-||< railway ||> 0.038 ||> 0.019 ||> 0.004 ||> +inland ship           0.038   0.019     0.004 | 
-||< maritime ship ||> 0.038 ||> 0.019 ||> 0.0038 ||> +railway               0.038   0.019     0.004 | 
-||< heavy-duty vehicle ||> 0.038 ||> 0.019 ||> 0.004 ||> +maritime ship         0.038   0.019    0.0038 | 
-||||||||= **for wheat** || +heavy-duty vehicle    0.038   0.019     0.004 | 
-||< inland ship ||> 0.038 ||> 0.019 ||> 0.004 ||> + for wheat                                       |||| 
-||< railway ||> 0.038 ||> 0.019 ||> 0.004 ||> +inland ship           0.038   0.019     0.004 | 
-||< maritime ship ||> 0.038 ||> 0.019 ||> 0.0038 ||> +railway               0.038   0.019     0.004 | 
-||< heavy-duty vehicle ||> 0.038 ||> 0.019 ||> 0.004 ||>+maritime ship         0.038   0.019    0.0038 | 
 +heavy-duty vehicle    0.038   0.019     0.004 |
  
 Here, in order to match the new NST-2007 classes for goods and materials, the very specific emission factors used in fomer submissions were converted to aggregated implied emission factors. Here, in order to match the new NST-2007 classes for goods and materials, the very specific emission factors used in fomer submissions were converted to aggregated implied emission factors.
Line 189: Line 190:
  
  
-==== Ratio TSP : PM<sub>10</sub> : PM<sub>2.5</sub> ==+** Ratio TSP : PM<sub>10</sub> : PM<sub>2.5</sub> **
  
 The shares of PM<sub>10</sub> and PM<sub>2.5</sub> of the entire amounts of emitted TSP have been set to fixed values used for the entire time series. The shares of PM<sub>10</sub> and PM<sub>2.5</sub> of the entire amounts of emitted TSP have been set to fixed values used for the entire time series.
  
 Assumptions:  Assumptions: 
-TSP = 100%,  +  - TSP = 100%,  
-50% of TSP are =< 10 µm. Therefore, the EF(PM<sub>10</sub>) are assumed as 1/2 of the corresponding EF(TSP), and +  50% of TSP are =< 10 µm. Therefore, the EF(PM<sub>10</sub>) are assumed as 1/2 of the corresponding EF(TSP), and 
-10% of TSP are =< 2.5 µm. Therefore, the EF(PM<sub>2.5</sub>) are assumed as 1/10 of the corresponding EF(TSP). +  10% of TSP are =< 2.5 µm. Therefore, the EF(PM<sub>2.5</sub>) are assumed as 1/10 of the corresponding EF(TSP).
- +
-[[image PM-ratios.PNG]]+
  
 The ratios of TSP, PM<sub>10</sub>, and PM<sub>2.5</sub> were also discussed in the research project mentioned above, but without generating any new data. Nonetheless, the ratios might be to low at the moment and will be checked furthermore. The ratios of TSP, PM<sub>10</sub>, and PM<sub>2.5</sub> were also discussed in the research project mentioned above, but without generating any new data. Nonetheless, the ratios might be to low at the moment and will be checked furthermore.
Line 210: Line 209:
 Although no specific improvement is planned, additional effort will be necessary to further minimise the inconsistencies in the activity data time series resulting from the different approaches applied. Although no specific improvement is planned, additional effort will be necessary to further minimise the inconsistencies in the activity data time series resulting from the different approaches applied.
  
------- 
  
-[[bibliography]] + 
-: 1 : Müller-BBM, 2011: Dr. Matthias Bender, Ludger Gronewäller, Detlef Langer: Konsistenzprüfung und Verbesserungspotenzial der Schüttgutemissionsberechnung - Umweltforschungsplan des Bundesministeriums für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit, Förderkennzeichen3708 49 107 2 - FB 00 1453 UBA; Müller- BBM GmbH, Im Auftrag des Umweltbundesamtes, Planegg/Dessau-Roßlau, Februar 2011 - URL: https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/publikationen/konsistenzpruefung-verbesserungspotenzial +[(MÜLLERBBM2011> Müller-BBM, 2011: Dr. Matthias Bender, Ludger Gronewäller, Detlef Langer: Konsistenzprüfung und Verbesserungspotenzial der Schüttgutemissionsberechnung - Umweltforschungsplan des Bundesministeriums für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit, Förderkennzeichen3708 49 107 2 - FB 00 1453 UBA; Müller- BBM GmbH, Im Auftrag des Umweltbundesamtes, Planegg/Dessau-Roßlau, Februar 2011 - URL: https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/publikationen/konsistenzpruefung-verbesserungspotenzial )] 
-: 2 : Eurostat, 2015a: Standard Goods Classification for Transport Statistics/Revised (1967) NST/R - URL: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/ramon/nomenclatures/index.cfm?TargetUrl=LST_NOM_DTL&StrNom=NSTR_1967&StrLanguageCode=EN&IntPcKey=&StrLayoutCode=HIERARCHIC +[(EUROSTAT2015a> Eurostat, 2015a: Standard Goods Classification for Transport Statistics/Revised (1967) NST/R - URL:  https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/ramon/nomenclatures/index.cfm?TargetUrl=LST_NOM_DTL&StrNom=NSTR_1967&StrLanguageCode=EN&IntPcKey=&StrLayoutCode=HIERARCHIC )] 
-: 3 : Eurostat, 2015b: Standard goods classification for transport statistics, 2007 - URL: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/ramon/nomenclatures/index.cfm?TargetUrl=LST_NOM_DTL&StrNom=NST_2007&StrLanguageCode=EN&IntPcKey=&StrLayoutCode=HIERARCHIC +[(EUROSTAT2015b> Eurostat, 2015b: Standard goods classification for transport statistics, 2007 - URL:  https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/ramon/nomenclatures/index.cfm?TargetUrl=LST_NOM_DTL&StrNom=NST_2007&StrLanguageCode=EN&IntPcKey=&StrLayoutCode=HIERARCHIC )] 
-: 4 : Destatis, 2013: Statistisches Bundesamt, Verkehr, NST-2007: Einheitliches Güterverzeichnis für die Verkehrsstatistik – 2007 - URL: https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Branchen-Unternehmen/Transport-Verkehr/Gueterverkehr/Tabellen/nsz-2007.html +[(DESTATIS2013> Destatis, 2013: Statistisches Bundesamt, Verkehr, NST-2007: Einheitliches Güterverzeichnis für die Verkehrsstatistik – 2007 - URL: https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Branchen-Unternehmen/Transport-Verkehr/Gueterverkehr/Tabellen/nsz-2007.html )]
-[[/bibliography]]+