meta data for this page
  •  

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
sector:ippu:mineral_industry:construction_demolition:start [2021/01/26 14:20] – [Table] kotzullasector:ippu:mineral_industry:construction_demolition:start [2022/03/22 08:06] (current) – [Recalculations] kotzulla
Line 3: Line 3:
 ===== Short description ===== ===== Short description =====
  
-^  Method  ^  AD  ^  EF  ^  Key Category                   ^ +^ Category Code  ^  Method                                                                           ||||^  AD                                        ||||^  EF                              ||||| 
-|  T1      |  NS  |  CS  |  **L&T:** TSP, PM<sub>10</sub>  |+| 2.A.5.b        |  T1                                                                               |||||  NS                                        |||||  CS                              ||||| 
 +^                ^  NO<sub>x</sub>  ^  NMVOC  ^  SO<sub>2</sub>  ^  NH<sub>3</sub>  ^  PM<sub>2.5</sub>  ^  PM<sub>10</sub>  ^  TSP  ^  BC  ^  CO  ^  Pb  ^  Cd  ^  Hg  ^  Diox  ^  PAH  ^  HCB  ^ 
 +| Key Category:  |  -               |  -      |  -               |  -               |  -/-               |  L/T              |  L/-  |  -   |  -   |  -   |  -   |  -   |  -     |  -    |  -    |
  
 {{page>general:Misc:LegendEIT:start}} {{page>general:Misc:LegendEIT:start}}
  
- +\\ 
-Information about the key source relevance can be found in [[[2-a-mineral-industry | 2.A Mineral Industry]]]. For particulate emissions, Construction is the main emissions source in the Mineral industries.+For particulate emissions, Construction is the second main emissions source in the Mineral industries.
  
 ===== Methodology ===== ===== Methodology =====
  
-Since the last update of the UNECE Guidebook we use the Tier 1 method to estimate the national emissions of particulate matters. The approach for uncontrolled fugitive emissions for this source category was adapted for national circumstances within a research Project (Umweltbundesamt, 2016) [((bibcite 1))], partly considered exiting control techniques. As a result, the information of the statistics is combined with modified default emission factors for TSP and PM.+Since the last update of the UNECE Guidebook we use the Tier 1 method to estimate the national emissions of particulate matters. The approach for uncontrolled fugitive emissions for this source category was adapted for national circumstances within a research Project (Umweltbundesamt, 2016) [(Umweltbundesamt, 2016: Development of Methods for the Generation of Emission Data for Air Pollutants from Building Activity and Construction Zones, Dessau-Roßlau, 2016 FILE?)], partly considered exiting control techniques. As a result, the information of the statistics is combined with modified default emission factors for TSP and PM.
  
 ==== Activity data ==== ==== Activity data ====
Line 21: Line 23:
 ==== Emission factors ==== ==== Emission factors ====
  
-The emission factors used are results of Adaptation of UNECE-Defaults (EEA, 2016) [((bibcite 2))], see chapter NFR 2.A.5.b for different kind of buildings.+The emission factors used are results of Adaptation of UNECE-Defaults (EEA, 2016) [(EEA2016>EEA, 2016: EEA Report No 21/2016 EMEP EEA air pollutant emission inventory guidebook 2016, Copenhagen, 2016; https://www.eea.europa.eu/ds_resolveuid/EJ6RT9P2Y3)], see chapter NFR 2.A.5.b for different kind of buildings.
  
 __Table 1: Overview of apllied emission factors__ __Table 1: Overview of apllied emission factors__
-||~ kind of building ||~ pollutant ||~ EF value  ||~ unit ||~ EF trend || +^ Kind of building                 ^^ Pollutant      ^^ EF value      ^^ Unit          ^^ EF trend       ^^^ 
-|| single and two family houses  || TSP  ||  0.0638  || kg/m^^2^^ * y || constant|| +| single and two family houses     ||  TSP           ||  0.0638       ||  kg/m²*y      ||  constant      ^|| 
-|| single and two family houses  || PM,,10,, ||  0.0191  || kg/m^^2^^ * y || constant|| +| single and two family houses     ||  PM₁₀          ||  0.0191       ||  kg/m²*y      ||  constant      ^|| 
-|| single and two family houses  || PM,,2.5,, ||  0.0019  || kg/m^^2^^ * y || constant|| +| single and two family houses     ||  PM₂.₅         ||  0.0019       ||  kg/m²*y      ||  constant      ^|| 
-|| apartment buildings  || TSP  ||  0.329  || kg/m^^2^^ * y || constant|| +| apartment buildings              ||  TSP           ||  0.329        ||  kg/m²*y      ||  constant      ^|| 
-|| apartment buildings  || PM,,10,, ||  0.099  || kg/m^^2^^ * y || constant|| +| apartment buildings              ||  PM₁₀          ||  0.099        ||  kg/m²*y      ||  constant      ^|| 
-|| apartment buildings  || PM,,2.5,, ||  0.0099  || kg/m^^2^^ * y || constant|| +| apartment buildings              ||  PM₂.₅         ||  0.0099       ||  kg/m²*y      ||  constant      ^|| 
-|| non-residential  || TSP  ||  0.631  || kg/m^^2^^ * y || constant|| +| non-residential                  ||  TSP           ||  0.631        ||  kg/m²*y      ||  constant      ^|| 
-|| non-residential  || PM,,10,, ||  0.189  || kg/m^^2^^ * y || constant|| +| non-residential                  ||  PM₁₀          ||  0.189        ||  kg/m²*y      ||  constant      ^|| 
-|| non-residential  || PM,,2.5,, ||  0.0189  || kg/m^^2^^ * y || constant|| +| non-residential                  ||  PM₂.₅         ||  0.0189       ||  kg/m²*y      ||  constant      ^|| 
-|| roads  || TSP  ||  1,674  || t/km^^2^^ * y || constant|| +| roads                            ||  TSP           ||  1,674        ||  kg/m²*y      ||  constant      ^|| 
-|| roads  || PM,,10,, ||  502  || t/km^^2^^ * y || constant|| +| roads                            ||  PM₁₀          ||  502          ||  kg/m²*y      ||  constant      ^|| 
-|| roads  || PM,,2.5,, ||  50.2  || t/km^^2^^ * y || constant||+| roads                            ||  PM₂.₅         ||  50.2         ||  kg/m²*y      ||  constant      ^||
  
 Several further assumptions were necessary to use the formula of the Guidebook: Several further assumptions were necessary to use the formula of the Guidebook:
-||~ EM=EF*B*f*m||+| EM = EF*B*f*m     ||
  
-The EF is adapted with Moisture Level Correction factor and Silt Content Correction factor in all cases, both 0.20 and 2.22. The assumption about the duration of the construction activity uses the Default values. +The EF is adapted with Moisture Level Correction factor and Silt Content Correction factor in all cases, both 0.20 and 2.22. The assumption about the duration of the construction activity uses the Default values (EEA, 2016)[(EEA2016)]: 
-||~ Type of building ||~ Estimated duration (year) || +^ Type of building                                   ^^  Estimated duration (year)      ^^ 
-|| Construction of houses (single and two family) || 0.5 (6 months) || +| Construction of houses (single and two family)     ||  0.5 (6 months)                 || 
-|| Construction of apartments (all types) || 0.75 (9 months) || +| Construction of apartments (all types)             ||  0.75 (9 months)                || 
-|| Non-residential construction || 0.83 (10 months) || +| Non-residential construction                       ||  0.83 (10 months)               || 
-|| Road construction || 1 (12 months) || +| Road construction                                  ||  1 (12 months)                  ||
-Source (EEA, 2016) [((bibcite 2))]+
  
 AD is a result of multiplying B the number of houses constructed and f the conversion factor. AD is a result of multiplying B the number of houses constructed and f the conversion factor.
  
-+ __Trends in emissions__ +===== Trends in emissions =====
 All trends in emissions as product of EF and AD correspond to trends of construction activities. All trends in emissions as product of EF and AD correspond to trends of construction activities.
  
-[[gallery size="medium" viewer="yes"]] +[{{:sector:ippu:mineral_industry:EM_2A5b_since_1990.PNG|**Emission trends in NFR 2.A.5.b**}}]
-: EM_2A5b_since_1990.PNG +
-[[/gallery]] +
- +
-+ __Recalculations__+
  
 +===== Recalculations =====
 With **activity data** and **emission factors** remaining unrevised, no recalculations have been carried out compared to last year's submission. With **activity data** and **emission factors** remaining unrevised, no recalculations have been carried out compared to last year's submission.
  
 <WRAP center round info 60%> <WRAP center round info 60%>
-For pollutant-specific information on recalculated emission estimates for Base Year and 2018, please see the pollutant specific recalculation tables following [[general:recalculations:start|chapter 8.1 - Recalculations]].+For **pollutant-specific information on recalculated emission estimates for Base Year and 2019**, please see the pollutant specific recalculation tables following [[general:recalculations:start|chapter 8.1 - Recalculations]].
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
  
 =====Planned improvements ===== =====Planned improvements =====
- 
 At the moment, no category-specific improvements are planned. At the moment, no category-specific improvements are planned.
  
-**FAQ** +===== FAQs ===== 
-//**Where can I find emissions estimation of demolition activities?**// - Demolishing without any significant new construction is not covered and there are no other emission factors available for demolition activities only. Nevertheless you can find Information about emissions from [[[5-e-buildings-cars-fires | buildings fires]]]. +//**Where can I find emissions estimation of demolition activities?**// - Demolishing without any significant new construction is not covered and there are no other emission factors available for demolition activities only. Nevertheless you can find Information about emissions from  
-//**Why german EFs differ from EEA defaults?**// - It has to do with the default 50% reduction for non-residential buildings and roads (as a result of wetting unpaved temporary roads) that is assumed in the calculations for Germany. This is also already accounted for in the EPA emission factors. It is a result of a control measure that is nearly always taken but in principle optional. In the Guidebook a 50% reduction is advised. +[[sector:waste:other_waste:building_and_car_fires:start|5.E.2 - Other Waste: Building Fires]]. 
  
-------+//**Why do German EFs differ from EEA defaults?**// - It has to do with the default 50% reduction for non-residential buildings and roads (as a result of wetting unpaved temporary roads) that is assumed in the calculations for Germany. This is also already accounted for in the EPA emission factors. It is a result of a control measure that is nearly always taken but in principle optional. In the Guidebook a 50% reduction is advised.
  
-[[bibliography]] 
-: 1 : Umweltbundesamt, 2016: Development of Methods for the Generation of Emission Data for Air Pollutants from Building Activity and Construction Zones, Dessau-Roßlau, 2016;  
-[!--URL: http://webde/gruppen/bibliothek/OnlineReports/EF000592.pdf--] 
-[[file project-report_evaluation_CONSTRUCTION.pdf | Document (PDF)]] 
-: 2 : EEA, 2016: EEA Report No 21/2016 EMEP EEA air pollutant emission inventory guidebook 2016, Copenhagen, 2016; 
-URL: https://www.eea.europa.eu/ds_resolveuid/EJ6RT9P2Y3 
  
-[[/bibliography]]