meta data for this page
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
sector:energy:fuel_combustion:small_combustion:mobile_small_combustion:fishing [2021/04/15 07:43] – [Planned improvements] kotzulla | sector:energy:fuel_combustion:small_combustion:mobile_small_combustion:fishing [2023/05/17 07:35] – [Planned improvements] kotzulla | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Primary fuel delivery data for national fishing is included in NEB lines 6 (' | Primary fuel delivery data for national fishing is included in NEB lines 6 (' | ||
- | The actual annual amounts used are therefore calculated within (Deichnik (2020)), where ship movement data (AIS signal) allows for a bottom-up approach providing the needed differentiation.[(DEICHNIK2020)] | + | The actual annual amounts used are therefore calculated within (Deichnik (2022)), where ship movement data (AIS signal) allows for a bottom-up approach providing the needed differentiation.[(DEICHNIK2022)] |
__Table 1: Annual fuel consumption, | __Table 1: Annual fuel consumption, | ||
- | | | + | | |
- | ^ Diesel oil | + | ^ Diesel oil |
- | ^ Heavy fuel oil | + | ^ Heavy fuel oil |
- | | **Ʃ 1.A.4.c iii** ^ | + | | **Ʃ 1.A.4.c iii** ^ |
The strong increase after 2015 cannot be conclusively explained at the moment. However, even if the over-all fuel quantities delivered to the navigation sector would be somehow misallocated between the specific nautical acitivities, | The strong increase after 2015 cannot be conclusively explained at the moment. However, even if the over-all fuel quantities delivered to the navigation sector would be somehow misallocated between the specific nautical acitivities, | ||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
__Table 2: Annual country-specific emission factors, in kg/TJ__ | __Table 2: Annual country-specific emission factors, in kg/TJ__ | ||
- | | | + | | |
- | | Diesel oil | + | | **DIESEL OIL** ||||||||||||||||| |
- | ^ NH< | + | ^ NH< |
- | ^ NMVOC | + | ^ NMVOC |
- | ^ NO< | + | ^ NO< |
- | ^ SO< | + | ^ SO< |
- | ^ PM | | + | ^ BC < |
- | ^ BC <sup>2</sup> | + | ^ PM < |
- | ^ CO | 102 | 102 | 102 | 102 | 102 | 102 | 102 | | + | ^ PM <sub>10</sub> |
- | | Heavy fuel oil | + | ^ TSP |
- | ^ NH< | + | ^ CO | 102 | 102 | 102 | 102 | 102 | 102 | 102 | |
- | ^ NMVOC | + | | **HEAVY FUEL OIL** ||||||||||||||||| |
- | ^ NO< | + | ^ NH< |
- | ^ SO< | + | ^ NMVOC |
- | ^ PM<sub>2.5</sub><sup>1</ | + | ^ NO< |
- | ^ PM< | + | ^ SO< |
- | ^ TSP | | + | ^ BC <sup> |
- | ^ BC< | + | ^ PM <sub>2.5</ |
- | ^ CO | | + | ^ PM < |
+ | ^ TSP | | ||
+ | ^ CO | | ||
< | < | ||
< | < | ||
Line 66: | Line 68: | ||
===== Recalculations ===== | ===== Recalculations ===== | ||
- | Recalculations occur only due to the revised | + | With both **activity data and emission factors unaltered**, no recalculations occur against last year's submission. |
- | As, based on expert information, no biodiesel is used in NFR 1.A.4.c iii, these amounts estimated so far based on official blending shares have been removed and replaced by notation key 'NO'. | + | |
- | In contrast, the amounts of diesel oil and heavy fuel oil modelled based on ship movement data remain unaltered. | ||
- | __Table 3: Revised biodiesel consumption estimates, in terajoules__ | + | <WRAP center round info 65%> |
- | | | + | For **pollutant-specific information on recalculated emission estimates for Base Year and 2020**, please see the recalculation tables following [[general: |
- | | **Diesel oil** | + | |
- | ^ Submission 2021 | + | |
- | ^ Submission 2020 | + | |
- | ^ absolute change | + | |
- | ^ relative change | + | |
- | | **Biodiesel** | + | |
- | ^ Submission 2021 | + | |
- | ^ Submission 2020 | + | |
- | ^ absolute change | + | |
- | ^ relative change | + | |
- | | **Total fuel consumption** | + | |
- | ^ Submission 2021 | + | |
- | ^ Submission 2020 | + | |
- | ^ absolute change | + | |
- | ^ relative change | + | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | All **emission factors** remain unrevised. | + | |
- | + | ||
- | <WRAP center round info 60%> | + | |
- | For pollutant-specific information on recalculated emission estimates for Base Year and 2018, please see the pollutant specific | + | |
</ | </ | ||
Line 103: | Line 82: | ||
Besides a routine revision of the underlying BSH model, further focus will be put on the correct allocation of actvity data to the different navigation activities covered in different NFR sub-sectors. | Besides a routine revision of the underlying BSH model, further focus will be put on the correct allocation of actvity data to the different navigation activities covered in different NFR sub-sectors. | ||
+ | |||
+ | With respect to the strong increase in Aactivity data from 2015 to 2016: This issue is under discussion with the BSH Hamburg as the agency in charge of the underlying model. However, activity data is based on ship movement data showing a correspondingly increasing trend. Nonetheless, | ||
- | [(DEICHNIK2020> Deichnik (2020): Aktualisierung und Revision des Modells zur Berechnung der spezifischen Verbräuche und Emissionen des von Deutschland ausgehenden Seeverkehrs. from Bundesamts für Seeschifffahrt und Hydrographie (BSH); Hamburg, | + | [(DEICHNIK2022> Deichnik (2022): Aktualisierung und Revision des Modells zur Berechnung der spezifischen Verbräuche und Emissionen des von Deutschland ausgehenden Seeverkehrs. from Bundesamts für Seeschifffahrt und Hydrographie (BSH); Hamburg, |
[(EMEPEEA2019> | [(EMEPEEA2019> | ||
[(RENTZ2008> | [(RENTZ2008> |