meta data for this page
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
appendices:appendix2.3-hm-from-mobile-sources [2021/04/14 21:08] – kotzulla | appendices:appendix2.3-hm-from-mobile-sources [2024/11/06 13:54] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
For heavy-metal exhaust emissions (other then lead from leaded gasoline), tier1 values have been derived from tier1 default values provided in the 2019 EMEP/EEA Guidebook. | For heavy-metal exhaust emissions (other then lead from leaded gasoline), tier1 values have been derived from tier1 default values provided in the 2019 EMEP/EEA Guidebook. | ||
- | __Table 1: Tier1 default emisison factors applied to road vehicles, in [g/TJ]__ | + | __Table 1: Tier1 default emisison factors applied to road vehicles, in g/TJ__ |
| ^ **Pb** | | ^ **Pb** | ||
^ Diesel oil | ^ Diesel oil | ||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
< | < | ||
- | In contrast to the 2013 GB, the July 2017 version of the 2016 GB provides separate values for Hm from fuel combustion (icluding engine wear) and the unintended co-incineration of lube oil. | + | The 2019 GB provides separate values for Hm from fuel combustion (icluding engine wear) and the unintended co-incineration of lube oil. |
The latter are reported in NFR 2.D as emissions from product use. (//Note: This country-specific approach has been discussed and accepted at both the 2018 TFEIP meeting and the 2018 NEC review.//) | The latter are reported in NFR 2.D as emissions from product use. (//Note: This country-specific approach has been discussed and accepted at both the 2018 TFEIP meeting and the 2018 NEC review.//) | ||
- | __Screenshot of EMEP/EEA GB 2016 (2013), chapter 1.A.3.b, Table 3-104: Heavy metal emission factors for all vehicle categories in mg/kg fuel:__ | + | {{ :general:appendices:emepeea2019_1a3b_table3.78_ef_hm_fuel.png ?700 }} |
- | [[gallery size=" | + | {{ :general:appendices:emepeea2019_1a3b_table3.78_ef_hm_lubricant.png ?700 }} |
- | : GB2016(2013)_default-EF(HM).JPG | + | |
- | [[/ | + | |
- | + | ||
- | Unfortunately, | + | |
- | + | ||
- | __Screenshot of EMEP/EEA GB 2016 (July 2017), chapter 1.A.3.b, Table 3.77: Heavy metal emission factors for all vehicle categories in ppm/wt fuel:__ | + | |
- | [[gallery size=" | + | |
- | : GB2016(July2017)_default-EF(HM)_from_fuels.JPG | + | |
- | [[/ | + | |
- | + | ||
- | __Screenshot of EMEP/EEA GB 2016, chapter 1.A.3.b, Table 3.78: Heavy metal emission factors for all vehicle categories in ppm/wt lubricant__ | + | |
- | [[gallery size=" | + | |
- | : GB2016(July2017)_default-EF(HM)_from_lubricants.JPG | + | |
- | [[/ | + | |
===== Non-road Mobile Machinery in 1.A.2.g vii, 1.A.4.a.ii, | ===== Non-road Mobile Machinery in 1.A.2.g vii, 1.A.4.a.ii, | ||
Line 39: | Line 25: | ||
Without country-specific information, | Without country-specific information, | ||
- | However, instead of using the emission factors provided in (EMEP/ | + | However, instead of using the emission factors provided in (EMEP/ |
Here, separate tier1 default EFs are provided there in tables 3.77 and 3.78 of the GB chapter for road transport. | Here, separate tier1 default EFs are provided there in tables 3.77 and 3.78 of the GB chapter for road transport. | ||
Line 46: | Line 32: | ||
//(Note: Until submission 2017, the EMEP/EEA default EFs provided for NRMM were used in the German inventory. As these EFs do not differentiate between fuel combustion and lubricant co-incineration, | //(Note: Until submission 2017, the EMEP/EEA default EFs provided for NRMM were used in the German inventory. As these EFs do not differentiate between fuel combustion and lubricant co-incineration, | ||
- | __Table 2: Tier1 default emission factors applied to NRMM, in [g/TJ__ | + | __Table 2: Tier1 default emission factors applied to NRMM, in g/TJ__ |
| ^ **Pb** | | ^ **Pb** | ||
^ Diesel oil | ^ Diesel oil | ||
Line 58: | Line 44: | ||
===== Railways ===== | ===== Railways ===== | ||
- | __Table 3: Tier1 default emission factors applied to railway vehicles, in [g/TJ]__ | + | __Table 3: Tier1 default emission factors applied to railway vehicles, in g/TJ__ |
| ^ **Pb** | | ^ **Pb** | ||
^ Diesel oil | ^ Diesel oil | ||
Line 66: | Line 52: | ||
^ Hard Coal | | ^ Hard Coal | | ||
^ Hard Coal Coke | ^ Hard Coal Coke | ||
- | < | + | < |
- | < | + | < |
< | < | ||
(//NOTE: Assuming that biodiesel contains far less HMs than fossil diesel oil, similar values are applied to all mobile sources using this biogenic fuel.//) | (//NOTE: Assuming that biodiesel contains far less HMs than fossil diesel oil, similar values are applied to all mobile sources using this biogenic fuel.//) | ||
- | As the EMEP/EEA GB 2016 does not provide specific defaults for **Pb, Hg and As**, the EF applied here has been derived from chapter: 1.A.3.b i-iv - Road transport: exhaust emissions: tier1 value for diesel vehicles. | + | As the EMEP/EEA GB 2019 does not provide specific defaults for **Pb, Hg and As**, the EF applied here has been derived from chapter: 1.A.3.b i-iv - Road transport: exhaust emissions: tier1 value for diesel vehicles. |
- | [[gallery size=" | + | Besides these emissions from fuel combustion and engine wear, the German inventory also covers **abrasive emissions from brakes, wheels on rail and contact line**. |
- | : GB2016_EF_NE+NA_1.A.3.c.png | + | Here, a country-specific approach is applied with emissions of (i) chromium and nickel being estimated as part of the particle emissions from brake wear whereas emissions of copper (ii) copper are estimated as part of the PM emissions from the contact line. |
- | [[/gallery]] | + | |
+ | __Table 4: Country-specific emission factors for abrasive emissions, in g/km__ | ||
+ | ^ | ||
+ | ^ Contact line < | ||
+ | ^ Tyres on rails < | ||
+ | ^ Braking system <sup>3</ | ||
+ | ^ Current collector < | ||
+ | < | ||
+ | < | ||
+ | < | ||
+ | < | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
===== Inland Vessels and Ships in 1.A.3.d ii ===== | ===== Inland Vessels and Ships in 1.A.3.d ii ===== | ||
- | __Table | + | __Table |
| ^ **Pb** | | ^ **Pb** | ||
^ Diesel oil | 1.21 | 0.233 | ^ Diesel oil | 1.21 | 0.233 | ||
Line 89: | Line 87: | ||
The following table provides the tier1 EF applied for HMs from ships and vessels in both civil and military operation in NFR categories 1.A.3.d i -International Maritime Navigation, 1.A.3.d ii - National Navigation (Shipping), 1.A.4.c iii -Fisheryand 1.A.5.b iii - Other: Military Navigation. | The following table provides the tier1 EF applied for HMs from ships and vessels in both civil and military operation in NFR categories 1.A.3.d i -International Maritime Navigation, 1.A.3.d ii - National Navigation (Shipping), 1.A.4.c iii -Fisheryand 1.A.5.b iii - Other: Military Navigation. | ||
- | __Table | + | __Table |
| | | | ||
^ Heavy Fuel oil< | ^ Heavy Fuel oil< | ||
^ Diesel oil< | ^ Diesel oil< | ||
^ Biodiesel< | ^ Biodiesel< | ||
- | < | + | < |
- | < | + | < |
< | < | ||
(//NOTE: Assuming that biodiesel contains far less HMs than fossil diesel oil, similar values are applied to all mobile sources using this biogenic fuel.//) | (//NOTE: Assuming that biodiesel contains far less HMs than fossil diesel oil, similar values are applied to all mobile sources using this biogenic fuel.//) | ||
Line 101: | Line 99: | ||
===== Aircraft in 1.A.3.a and 1.A.5.b ii ===== | ===== Aircraft in 1.A.3.a and 1.A.5.b ii ===== | ||
- | The EMEP/EEA GB 2016 (July 2017) does not provide specific defaults for HM emissions from the combustion of jet kerosene and aviation gasoline, stating that for for aviation gasoline these emissions are //not estimated// (NE): | + | The EMEP/EEA GB 2019 does not provide specific defaults for HM emissions from the combustion of jet kerosene and aviation gasoline, stating that for for aviation gasoline these emissions are //not estimated// (NE): |
- | + | ||
- | [[gallery size=" | + | |
- | : GB2016(July2017)_EF_NA+NE_Avgas.PNG | + | |
- | [[/ | + | |
Therefore, the inventory compiler decided to apply the tier1 EF from gasoline fuel used in non-road mobile machinery here, too. | Therefore, the inventory compiler decided to apply the tier1 EF from gasoline fuel used in non-road mobile machinery here, too. | ||
Although the Party assumes that HM emissions are also likely to occur from the combustion of jet kerosene, no gap-filling is carried out for this fuel. Instead, all HM emission from jet kerosene are reported as //not estimated// (NE). | Although the Party assumes that HM emissions are also likely to occur from the combustion of jet kerosene, no gap-filling is carried out for this fuel. Instead, all HM emission from jet kerosene are reported as //not estimated// (NE). | ||
- | __Table | + | __Table |
- | | | **Pb** | + | | |
- | ^ Kerosene ||||||||| NE | | + | ^ Kerosene |
- | ^ Aviation gasoline | 9, | + | ^ Aviation gasoline |
< | < | ||
- | ------ | + | [(EMEPEEA2019> |
- | + | ||
- | [[bibliography]] | + | |
- | : 1 : EMEP/ | + | |
- | [[/ | + |