meta data for this page
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
appendices:appendix2.3-hm-from-mobile-sources [2021/04/14 21:27] – kotzulla | appendices:appendix2.3-hm-from-mobile-sources [2024/11/06 13:54] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
===== Railways ===== | ===== Railways ===== | ||
- | __Table 3: Tier1 default emission factors applied to railway vehicles, in [g/TJ]__ | + | __Table 3: Tier1 default emission factors applied to railway vehicles, in g/TJ__ |
| ^ **Pb** | | ^ **Pb** | ||
^ Diesel oil | ^ Diesel oil | ||
Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
As the EMEP/EEA GB 2019 does not provide specific defaults for **Pb, Hg and As**, the EF applied here has been derived from chapter: 1.A.3.b i-iv - Road transport: exhaust emissions: tier1 value for diesel vehicles. | As the EMEP/EEA GB 2019 does not provide specific defaults for **Pb, Hg and As**, the EF applied here has been derived from chapter: 1.A.3.b i-iv - Road transport: exhaust emissions: tier1 value for diesel vehicles. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Besides these emissions from fuel combustion and engine wear, the German inventory also covers **abrasive emissions from brakes, wheels on rail and contact line**. | ||
+ | Here, a country-specific approach is applied with emissions of (i) chromium and nickel being estimated as part of the particle emissions from brake wear whereas emissions of copper (ii) copper are estimated as part of the PM emissions from the contact line. | ||
+ | |||
+ | __Table 4: Country-specific emission factors for abrasive emissions, in g/km__ | ||
+ | ^ | ||
+ | ^ Contact line < | ||
+ | ^ Tyres on rails < | ||
+ | ^ Braking system < | ||
+ | ^ Current collector < | ||
+ | < | ||
+ | < | ||
+ | < | ||
+ | < | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
===== Inland Vessels and Ships in 1.A.3.d ii ===== | ===== Inland Vessels and Ships in 1.A.3.d ii ===== | ||
- | __Table | + | __Table |
| ^ **Pb** | | ^ **Pb** | ||
^ Diesel oil | 1.21 | 0.233 | ^ Diesel oil | 1.21 | 0.233 | ||
Line 71: | Line 87: | ||
The following table provides the tier1 EF applied for HMs from ships and vessels in both civil and military operation in NFR categories 1.A.3.d i -International Maritime Navigation, 1.A.3.d ii - National Navigation (Shipping), 1.A.4.c iii -Fisheryand 1.A.5.b iii - Other: Military Navigation. | The following table provides the tier1 EF applied for HMs from ships and vessels in both civil and military operation in NFR categories 1.A.3.d i -International Maritime Navigation, 1.A.3.d ii - National Navigation (Shipping), 1.A.4.c iii -Fisheryand 1.A.5.b iii - Other: Military Navigation. | ||
- | __Table | + | __Table |
| | | | ||
^ Heavy Fuel oil< | ^ Heavy Fuel oil< | ||
Line 88: | Line 104: | ||
Although the Party assumes that HM emissions are also likely to occur from the combustion of jet kerosene, no gap-filling is carried out for this fuel. Instead, all HM emission from jet kerosene are reported as //not estimated// (NE). | Although the Party assumes that HM emissions are also likely to occur from the combustion of jet kerosene, no gap-filling is carried out for this fuel. Instead, all HM emission from jet kerosene are reported as //not estimated// (NE). | ||
- | __Table | + | __Table |
| ^ **Pb** | | ^ **Pb** | ||
^ Kerosene | ^ Kerosene | ||
Line 94: | Line 110: | ||
< | < | ||
- | [(EMEPEEA2019> | + | [(EMEPEEA2019> |