meta data for this page
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
general:planned_improvements:start [2024/04/25 16:54] – [Table] vosen | general:planned_improvements:start [2024/11/06 13:54] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
===== Investigated Review Findings ===== | ===== Investigated Review Findings ===== | ||
==== NECD 2023 ==== | ==== NECD 2023 ==== | ||
- | ^ Aspect | + | ^ Aspect |
- | | (lack of) Transparency | + | | (lack of) Transparency |
- | | ::: | 2D3 | + | | ::: | 2D3 |
- | | ::: | 2D3a | 2023 | Improve discription of domestic solvent use | DE-2D3a-2023-0001 | + | | ::: | 2D3a | 2023 | Improve discription of domestic solvent use | DE-2D3a-2023-0001 |
- | | ::: | 2D3i | 2023 | consider the allocation of NMVOC emissions from lubricants | + | | ::: | 2D3i | 2023 | consider the allocation of NMVOC emissions from lubricants |
- | | ::: | 3Da2c | + | | ::: | 3Da2c |
- | | ::: | 3Dc | + | | ::: | 3Dc |
- | | ::: | 5E | 2023 | Include the information (weighting factors applied for each type of buildings/ | + | | ::: | 5E | 2023 | Include the information (weighting factors applied for each type of buildings/ |
- | | ::: | 2A5a | 2023 | Include an explanation for how the share of the emissions from saltmining has been determined | + | | ::: | 2A5a | 2023 | Include an explanation for how the share of the emissions from saltmining has been determined |
- | | Accuracy | + | | Accuracy |
- | | ::: | 2D3e | 2023 | + | | ::: | 2D3e | 2023 |
- | | Completeness | + | | Completeness |
- | | ::: | 3B4h | 2023 | + | | ::: | |
- | | Consistency | + | | ::: | 5A |
- | | ::: | 3B4gii | + | | Consistency |
+ | | ::: | 3B4gii | ||
==== NECD 2022 ==== | ==== NECD 2022 ==== | ||
- | ^ Aspect | + | ^ Aspect |
- | | (lack of) Transparency | 1A5b | + | | (lack of) Transparency | 1A5b |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | Consistency | + | | Consistency |
- | | Completeness | + | | Completeness |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | Accuracy | + | | Accuracy |
Line 70: | Line 71: | ||
==== NECD 2021 ==== | ==== NECD 2021 ==== | ||
- | ^ Aspect | + | ^ Aspect |
- | | General | + | | General |
- | | (lack of) Transparency | 1A1a\1A2gviii\1A4\1B1 | + | | (lack of) Transparency | 1A1a\1A2gviii\1A4\1B1 |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | Consistency | + | | Consistency |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | Completeness | + | | Completeness |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | Comparability | + | | Comparability |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | Accuracy | + | | Accuracy |
Line 102: | Line 103: | ||
| General | | General | ||
| (lack of) Transparency | 3I | | (lack of) Transparency | 3I | ||
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
| ::: | | ::: | ||
| Consistency | | Consistency | ||
| ::: | | ::: | ||
| Completeness | | Completeness | ||
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | Accuracy | + | | Accuracy |
| ::: | | ::: | ||
- | | QA/QC | + | | QA/QC |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
Line 126: | Line 127: | ||
==== NECD 2019 ==== | ==== NECD 2019 ==== | ||
- | ^ Aspect | + | ^ Aspect |
- | | (lack of) Transparency | 1A1 | 2017 | Presents its NH3 EF for stationary combustion in the next submission of its IIR justify the use of these and compare these against the values in 2016 EMEP/EEA Guidebook. | + | | (lack of) Transparency | 1A1 | 2017 | Presents its NH3 EF for stationary combustion in the next submission of its IIR justify the use of these and compare these against the values in 2016 EMEP/EEA Guidebook. |
- | | Consistency | + | | Consistency |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | Completeness | + | | Completeness |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | Comparability | + | | Comparability |
- | | Accuracy | + | | Accuracy |
- | | ::: | 2D3a | 2018 | Rationale for not estimating emissions in category 2D3a and notation key selection | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | 3B | 2019 | Tier 1 method used for key category | + | | ::: |
Line 158: | Line 159: | ||
==== NECD 2018 ==== | ==== NECD 2018 ==== | ||
^ Aspect | ^ Aspect | ||
- | | (lack of) Transparency | 1A1 | 2017 | Presents its NH3 EF for stationary combustion in the next submission of its IIR justify the use of these and compare these against the values in 2016 EMEP/EEA Guidebook. | + | | (lack of) Transparency | 1A1 | 2017 | Presents its NH3 EF for stationary combustion in the next submission of its IIR justify the use of these and compare these against the values in 2016 EMEP/EEA Guidebook. |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | Consistency | + | | Consistency |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: | |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
| Completeness | | Completeness | ||
| ::: | | ::: | ||
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
| ::: | | ::: | ||
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | Comparability | + | | Comparability |
- | | Accuracy | + | | Accuracy |
- | | ::: | 2D3a | 2018 | Rationale for not estimating emissions in category 2D3a and notation key selection | + | | ::: | 2D3a | 2018 | Rationale for not estimating emissions in category 2D3a and notation key selection |
Line 189: | Line 190: | ||
==== NECD 2017 ==== | ==== NECD 2017 ==== | ||
- | ^ Aspect | + | ^ Aspect |
- | | (lack of) Transparency | 1A1 | + | | (lack of) Transparency | 1A1 |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | Consistency | + | | Consistency |
- | | ::: | 5E | 2010 | Although the Guidebook has methods for car and house fires in Chapter 6 it may be more transparent to include these in Chapter 7 as Chapter 6D is more focused on compost and sludge. The ERT encourages Germany to consider including some of these emissions in the next submissions. | + | | |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | Completeness | + | | ::: | 2B3 |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | Comparability | + | | Comparability |
- | | Accuracy | + | | Accuracy |
Line 256: | Line 257: | ||
==== CLRTAP 2014 ==== | ==== CLRTAP 2014 ==== | ||
- | ^ Aspect | + | ^ Aspect |
- | | General | + | | General |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | (lack of) Transparency | 3B | 2014 | Explain the variation in activity data for goats in the IIR. | + | | (lack of) Transparency | 3B | 2014 | Explain the variation in activity data for goats in the IIR. |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
+ | | Consistency | ||
+ | | ::: | 1A1\1A2 | ||
+ | | ::: | 2A1\2A2 | ||
+ | | ::: | 2D3 | 2014 | Provide emissions for 1990-2005 at a disaggregated level similar to later years if possible. If not explain why for the earlier period emissions have been estimated at a more aggregated level. Also clearly document in the case of IE where emissions have been allocated. | ||
+ | | ::: | 3B | 2014 | The ERT encourages Germany to further improve the consistency of the time series of NH3 for manure management. In chapter 4 of the EMEP/EEA Guidebook 2013 specific methods are provided. | ||
+ | | ::: | 3B | 2014 | Sheep animal numbers show a step change due to a different reporting time. This should be corrected for and described in the IIR as appropriate. | ||
+ | | ::: | 3B | 2014 | Check and explain the variation in activity data for horses in the IIR. | § 121 (CLRTAP 2014) | Yes | | | ||
+ | | ::: | 3B | 2014 | Explain how the change in farm practices or the implementation of mitigation measures has affected the time series in the IIR in order to facilitate the assessment of emission trends. | ||
+ | | ::: | 3B | 2014 | Explain in the IIR why the NH3 EF for dairy cattle decreased from 2011 to 2012. | § 122 (CLRTAP 2014) | Yes | | | ||
+ | | ::: | 3B | 2014 | Explain in the IIR why the NH3 EF for swine decreased from 1993 to 1994. | § 123 (CLRTAP 2014) | Yes | | | ||
+ | | ::: | 3B | 2014 | Explain in the IIR why the NH3 EF significant changes for different poultry subsectors in the 2000s. | ||
+ | | Completeness | ||
+ | | ::: | ||
+ | | ::: | ||
+ | | ::: | 5E | 2010 | Although the Guidebook has methods for car and house fires in Chapter 6 it may be more transparent to include these in Chapter 7 as Chapter 6D is more focused on compost and sludge. The ERT encourages Germany to consider including some of these emissions in the next submissions. | ||
+ | | ::: | 1A4ai\1A4ci\1A5a | ||
+ | | ::: | 1A3ai(i)\1A3aii(i) | ||
+ | | ::: | 1A3biv\1A4bii | ||
+ | | ::: | 1A3bv | 2014 | Evaporative emissions from running losses (i.e. vapour generated in the fuel tank during vehicle operation) were missing because not considered in the TREMOD model. The ERT recommends to include these in the inventory. | ||
+ | | ::: | 1A3dii | ||
+ | | ::: | 5A\5D | 2014 | Improves the completeness of the inventory by estimating emissions from solid waste disposal and wastewater handling. | ||
+ | | ::: | 5A\5C\5D | ||
+ | | Comparability | ||
+ | | ::: | 1A2a\1A4ai\1A4ci\1A5a | ||
+ | | Accuracy | ||
+ | | ::: | ||
+ | | ::: | 1A3bvi | ||
+ | | ::: | 1A3dii\1A5b | ||
+ | | ::: | 2A1 | 2010 | Cement production is a key source for Hg HCB and for NOx PM10 and PAH but Tier 1 is used. The ERT encourages Germany to use plant-specific data collected as part of the LCPD IPPC and E-PRTR to develop a tier 2 or 3 methodology in the near future and to document these in its IIR. | § 79 (CLRTAP 2010);§ 88 (CLRTAP 2014) | Yes | plant-specific data approach is not planned | ||
+ | | ::: | 2D3 | 2014 | Increase the use of information from individual installations that make a high contribution to the key categories | ||
+ | | ::: | 3B | 2014 | Describe the efforts taken to verify / validate the emission model in the IIR. | § 118 (CLRTAP 2014) | No | ||
+ | | QA/QC | ||
+ | | ::: | ||
+ | | ::: | ||
Line 276: | Line 311: | ||
- | |||
- | ==== CLRTAP 2014 ==== | ||
- | ^ Aspect | ||
- | | General | ||
- | | General | ||
- | ^ Aspect | ||
- | | QA/QC | | Fully implement the QA/QC system for the air pollutant emission inventory. If possible | ||
- | | QA/QC | | Widen the use of the existing QA/QC system | ||
- | | QA/QC | | Include information on verification and validation of the inventory in the IIR. | | ||
- | ^ Aspect | ||
- | | Transparency | ||
- | | Transparency | ||
- | | Transparency | ||
- | | Transparency | ||
- | | Transparency | ||
- | | Transparency | ||
- | | Transparency | ||
- | | Transparency | ||
- | | Transparency | ||
- | | Transparency | ||
- | ^ Aspect | ||
- | | Consistency | ||
- | | Consistency | ||
- | | Consistency | ||
- | | Consistency | ||
- | | Consistency | ||
- | | Consistency | ||
- | | Consistency | ||
- | | Consistency | ||
- | | Consistency | ||
- | | Consistency | ||
- | | Consistency | ||
- | ^ Aspect | ||
- | | Completeness | ||
- | | Completeness | ||
- | | Completeness | ||
- | | Completeness | ||
- | | Completeness | ||
- | | Completeness | ||
- | | Completeness | ||
- | | Completeness | ||
- | | Completeness | ||
- | | Completeness | ||
- | | Completeness | ||
- | ^ Aspect | ||
- | | Accuracy | ||
- | | Accuracy | ||
- | | Accuracy | ||
- | | Accuracy | ||
- | | Accuracy | ||
- | | Accuracy | ||
- | | Accuracy | ||
- | ^ Aspect | ||
- | | Comparability | ||
- | | Comparability | ||
==== CLRTAP 2010 ==== | ==== CLRTAP 2010 ==== | ||
- | ^ Aspect | + | ^ Aspect |
- | | General | + | | General |
- | ^ Aspect | + | | |
- | | QA/QC | | Fully implement | + | | ::: |
- | | QA/QC | | Widen the use of the existing QA/QC system | + | | ::: |
- | ^ Aspect | + | | ::: |
- | | Transparency | + | | ::: |
- | | Transparency | + | | ::: |
- | | Transparency | + | | ::: |
- | | Transparency | + | | ::: |
- | | Transparency | + | | Consistency |
- | | Transparency | + | | ::: |
- | | Transparency | + | | ::: |
- | | Transparency | + | | Completeness |
- | ^ Aspect | + | | ::: |
- | | Consistency | + | | ::: |
- | | Consistency | + | | ::: |
- | | Consistency | + | | ::: | |
- | ^ Aspect | + | | ::: |
- | | Completeness | + | | ::: |
- | | Completeness | + | | ::: |
- | | Completeness | + | | ::: |
- | | Completeness | + | | Comparability |
- | | Completeness | + | | ::: |
- | | Completeness | + | | ::: |
- | | Completeness | + | | Accuracy |
- | | Completeness | + | | ::: |
- | | Completeness | + | | ::: |
- | ^ Aspect | + | | ::: |
- | | Accuracy | + | | ::: |
- | | Accuracy | + | | QA/QC | | |
- | | Accuracy | + | | ::: | | 2010 | Widen the use of the existing QA/QC system |
- | | Accuracy | + | |
- | | Accuracy | + | |
- | ^ Aspect | + | |
- | | Comparability | + | |
- | | Comparability | + | |
- | | Comparability | + | |