meta data for this page
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
general:planned_improvements:start [2024/04/25 17:02] – [CLRTAP 2010] vosen | general:planned_improvements:start [2024/11/06 13:54] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
===== Investigated Review Findings ===== | ===== Investigated Review Findings ===== | ||
==== NECD 2023 ==== | ==== NECD 2023 ==== | ||
- | ^ Aspect | + | ^ Aspect |
- | | (lack of) Transparency | + | | (lack of) Transparency |
- | | ::: | 2D3 | + | | ::: | 2D3 |
- | | ::: | 2D3a | 2023 | Improve discription of domestic solvent use | DE-2D3a-2023-0001 | + | | ::: | 2D3a | 2023 | Improve discription of domestic solvent use | DE-2D3a-2023-0001 |
- | | ::: | 2D3i | 2023 | consider the allocation of NMVOC emissions from lubricants | + | | ::: | 2D3i | 2023 | consider the allocation of NMVOC emissions from lubricants |
- | | ::: | 3Da2c | + | | ::: | 3Da2c |
- | | ::: | 3Dc | + | | ::: | 3Dc |
- | | ::: | 5E | 2023 | Include the information (weighting factors applied for each type of buildings/ | + | | ::: | 5E | 2023 | Include the information (weighting factors applied for each type of buildings/ |
- | | ::: | 2A5a | 2023 | Include an explanation for how the share of the emissions from saltmining has been determined | + | | ::: | 2A5a | 2023 | Include an explanation for how the share of the emissions from saltmining has been determined |
- | | Accuracy | + | | Accuracy |
- | | ::: | 2D3e | 2023 | + | | ::: | 2D3e | 2023 |
- | | Completeness | + | | Completeness |
- | | ::: | 3B4h | 2023 | + | | ::: | |
- | | Consistency | + | | ::: | 5A |
- | | ::: | 3B4gii | + | | Consistency |
+ | | ::: | 3B4gii | ||
==== NECD 2022 ==== | ==== NECD 2022 ==== | ||
- | ^ Aspect | + | ^ Aspect |
- | | (lack of) Transparency | 1A5b | + | | (lack of) Transparency | 1A5b |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | Consistency | + | | Consistency |
- | | Completeness | + | | Completeness |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | Accuracy | + | | Accuracy |
Line 70: | Line 71: | ||
==== NECD 2021 ==== | ==== NECD 2021 ==== | ||
- | ^ Aspect | + | ^ Aspect |
- | | General | + | | General |
- | | (lack of) Transparency | 1A1a\1A2gviii\1A4\1B1 | + | | (lack of) Transparency | 1A1a\1A2gviii\1A4\1B1 |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | Consistency | + | | Consistency |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | Completeness | + | | Completeness |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | Comparability | + | | Comparability |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | Accuracy | + | | Accuracy |
Line 102: | Line 103: | ||
| General | | General | ||
| (lack of) Transparency | 3I | | (lack of) Transparency | 3I | ||
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
| ::: | | ::: | ||
| Consistency | | Consistency | ||
| ::: | | ::: | ||
| Completeness | | Completeness | ||
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | Accuracy | + | | Accuracy |
| ::: | | ::: | ||
- | | QA/QC | + | | QA/QC |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
Line 126: | Line 127: | ||
==== NECD 2019 ==== | ==== NECD 2019 ==== | ||
- | ^ Aspect | + | ^ Aspect |
- | | (lack of) Transparency | 1A1 | 2017 | Presents its NH3 EF for stationary combustion in the next submission of its IIR justify the use of these and compare these against the values in 2016 EMEP/EEA Guidebook. | + | | (lack of) Transparency | 1A1 | 2017 | Presents its NH3 EF for stationary combustion in the next submission of its IIR justify the use of these and compare these against the values in 2016 EMEP/EEA Guidebook. |
- | | Consistency | + | | Consistency |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | Completeness | + | | Completeness |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | Comparability | + | | Comparability |
- | | Accuracy | + | | Accuracy |
- | | ::: | 2D3a | 2018 | Rationale for not estimating emissions in category 2D3a and notation key selection | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | 3B | 2019 | Tier 1 method used for key category | + | | ::: |
Line 158: | Line 159: | ||
==== NECD 2018 ==== | ==== NECD 2018 ==== | ||
^ Aspect | ^ Aspect | ||
- | | (lack of) Transparency | 1A1 | 2017 | Presents its NH3 EF for stationary combustion in the next submission of its IIR justify the use of these and compare these against the values in 2016 EMEP/EEA Guidebook. | + | | (lack of) Transparency | 1A1 | 2017 | Presents its NH3 EF for stationary combustion in the next submission of its IIR justify the use of these and compare these against the values in 2016 EMEP/EEA Guidebook. |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | Consistency | + | | Consistency |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: | |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
| Completeness | | Completeness | ||
| ::: | | ::: | ||
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
| ::: | | ::: | ||
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | Comparability | + | | Comparability |
- | | Accuracy | + | | Accuracy |
- | | ::: | 2D3a | 2018 | Rationale for not estimating emissions in category 2D3a and notation key selection | + | | ::: | 2D3a | 2018 | Rationale for not estimating emissions in category 2D3a and notation key selection |
Line 189: | Line 190: | ||
==== NECD 2017 ==== | ==== NECD 2017 ==== | ||
- | ^ Aspect | + | ^ Aspect |
- | | (lack of) Transparency | 1A1 | + | | (lack of) Transparency | 1A1 |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | Consistency | + | | Consistency |
- | | ::: | 5E | 2010 | Although the Guidebook has methods for car and house fires in Chapter 6 it may be more transparent to include these in Chapter 7 as Chapter 6D is more focused on compost and sludge. The ERT encourages Germany to consider including some of these emissions in the next submissions. | + | | |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | Completeness | + | | ::: | 2B3 |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: |
- | | Comparability | + | | Comparability |
- | | Accuracy | + | | Accuracy |
Line 313: | Line 314: | ||
==== CLRTAP 2010 ==== | ==== CLRTAP 2010 ==== | ||
- | ^ Aspect | + | ^ Aspect |
- | | General | + | | General |
- | | ::: | + | | (lack of) Transparency |
- | | (lack of) Transparency | + | | ::: | | |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: | |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: | |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: | 1A3b | 2010 | Explain in more detail the emission calculation for road transport |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: | |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: | 3B | |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: | 5A\5B\5C |
- | | ::: | + | | Consistency |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: | |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: | 3B | |
- | | Consistency | + | | Completeness |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: | |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: | 5E | 2010 |
- | | ::: | 2D3 | 2014 | Provide emissions for 1990-2005 at a disaggregated level similar to later years if possible. If not explain why for the earlier period emissions have been estimated at a more aggregated level. Also clearly document in the case of IE where emissions have been allocated. | + | | ::: | |
- | | ::: | 3B | 2014 | The ERT encourages Germany to further improve the consistency of the time series of NH3 for manure management. In chapter 4 of the EMEP/EEA Guidebook 2013 specific methods are provided. | + | | ::: | |
- | | ::: | 3B | 2014 | Sheep animal numbers show a step change due to a different reporting time. This should be corrected | + | | ::: | |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: | |
- | | ::: | 3B | 2014 | Explain how the change in farm practices or the implementation of mitigation measures has affected the time series in the IIR in order to facilitate the assessment of emission trends. | + | | ::: | |
- | | ::: | 3B | 2014 | Explain in the IIR why the NH3 EF for dairy cattle decreased | + | | ::: | 5A\5C\5D |
- | | ::: | 3B | 2014 | Explain | + | | Comparability |
- | | ::: | 3B | 2014 | Explain in the IIR why the NH3 EF significant changes for different | + | | ::: | 1A2\2 |
- | | Completeness | + | | ::: | 1A3di(ii)\1A4ciii |
- | | ::: | + | | Accuracy |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: | |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: | 2A1 |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: | |
- | | ::: | 1A3ai(i)\1A3aii(i) | + | | ::: | 3B | |
- | | ::: | + | | QA/QC | | 2010 |
- | | ::: | + | | ::: | | 2010 |
- | | ::: | + | |
- | | ::: | + | |
- | | ::: | + | |
- | | Comparability | + | |
- | | ::: | + | |
- | | Accuracy | + | |
- | | ::: | + | |
- | | ::: | 1A3bvi | + | |
- | | ::: | 1A3dii\1A5b | + | |
- | | ::: | + | |
- | | ::: | + | |
- | | ::: | + | |
- | | QA/QC | + | |
- | | ::: | + | |
- | | ::: | + | |