meta data for this page
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
general:projections:wam-scenario [2023/06/23 06:48] – external edit 127.0.0.1 | general:projections:wam-scenario [2024/11/06 13:54] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | <WRAP center round info 60%> | ||
- | Projections have not yet been updated for the 2023 submission. The content below is outdated. | ||
- | </ | ||
- | |||
=== Additional measures that have not yet been implemented are assigned to the WAM scenario=== | === Additional measures that have not yet been implemented are assigned to the WAM scenario=== | ||
- | **Reduction in pulp and paper production | + | **Reduction in large coal combustion plants |
- | According | + | This measure assumes an accelerated phase-out of coal by 2030, according |
- | It is assumed for the sulphite process that all four plants located in Germany are operated with RTI of 50-300 MW. In the sense of a conservative estimate of the reduction potential, | + | When calculating |
- | (8) emission | + | The calculation of the emission |
- | In the field of the sulphate process there are two plants with different boiler sizes in Germany. To calculate the reduction potential, the percentage distribution of the two plants per boiler size was calculated according to a combustion heat output in the range of 100-300 MW and more than 300 MW over all time series (2006 to 2018). For this purpose, the emission | + | __Table 10: Potential |
+ | ^ Year ^ | ||
+ | ^ 2025 | -27.2 kt | -53.4 kt | -0.1 kt | -1.3 kt | | ||
+ | ^ 2030 | | ||
- | (9) mean NOx-emission (sulphate process) = 0.36 t/a * 250 mg/Nm^3 + 0.64 t/a * 200 mg/Nm^3 = 217.78 mg/Nm^3 | + | __Reduction of coal use:__ |
- | The emission factor for the sulfate process will be taken over from the 2020 submission | + | The coal use in a year results |
- | | + | Activity for a time series = [assigned activity of the time series in the reference scenario] / [total activity |
+ | This calculation results in a new value for each time series regarding coal use for each projection year. The last use of coal in large combustion plants will take place in 2029. Starting from 2030, the activity rate is assumed to drop close to zero. | ||
- | **Reduction | + | The calculation of the activity rate of the time series “Heat generation |
- | A possible amendment | + | Calculation |
+ | |||
+ | __Compensation through natural gas, hydrogen | ||
- | First reductions are not expected until 2025, which is why the emission factors | + | A proportional compensation |
- | The conversion is carried out for all source groups as shown in (11) using the example of refinery underfiring | + | __Table 11: Substitution of primary energy consumption from coal use in the WAM scenario [in TJ]__ |
+ | ^ Year ^ | ||
+ | ^ Total primary energy consumption from coal use in MMS (= WM scenario) | ||
+ | ^ Total primary energy consumption from coal use in KIS | 774193 | ||
+ | ^ Additional primary energy consumption from natural gas (50 % efficiency) in the WAM scenario | | ||
+ | ^ Additional primary energy consumption from hydrogen | ||
- | (11) NOx-emission (refinery underfiring with light heating oil) = 85 mg/Nm^3 / 3.49 = 24.4 kg/TJ | + | Table 11 shows the most important shifts in primary energy consumption in the WAM scenario. All data were derived from the 2021 projection report as well as the KIS report and can be extracted from the UBA projection database. |
- | This results in emission factors | + | For power generation from hydrogen only NO< |
- | For a total of twelve plants with heavy fuel oil as fuel input the bell regulation | + | __Table 12: Assumed emission factors for power generation from hydrogen__ |
+ | ^ regulation ^ in mg/m< | ||
+ | ^ Industrial emissions directive (IED) (plants | ||
+ | ^ 44<sup>th</ | ||
- | (12) percentage reductio | + | **Reductions in waste incineration and co-incineration plants through amendment |
- | A calculated reduction | + | As part of a draft amendment to the existing 17< |
- | The conversion is carried out in the same way as in (13) for all source groups as shown in the example of refinery underfiring in LCP with light heating oil as fuel. | + | The assumed emission limit of 100 mg/ |
- | (13) NOx-emission (refinery underfiring with light heating oil) = (400 mg/ | + | (5) NOx emission |
+ | In case, it is expected that this measure will be fully implemented in 2030. Thus, in the WAM scenario from 2030 and onwards, the emission factor of the affected time series is set at 62.6 kg/TJ. An alternative conversion factor of 1.79 will lead to a lower emission factor of 55.9 kg/TJ. In the sense of a conservative projection, the former was chosen (see equation (5)). | ||
- | **Other reductions | + | **NO< |
- | Emissions from other LCPs, which emerge from the energy balances, but cannot be clearly assigned | + | According to the existing 13< |
- | The emission factors | + | It is assumed |
- | __10: Estimated relative and absolute plant split of LCP according to operating time in the year__ | + | (6) NOx emission factor (sulphite process) = (2 kg/t * 85 mg/Nm^3) / 300 mg/Nm^3 = 0.57 kg/t |
- | ^ Operation time ^ RTI in MW ^ Proportion | + | |
- | | <1500 h/a | | + | |
- | | >1500 h/a | 214990 | + | |
- | | Total | 261563 | + | |
- | Since the first reduction effects | + | In the field of the sulphate process there are two plants > 50 MW with different boiler sizes in Germany. To calculate the reduction potential, the percentage distribution |
- | The calculation is shown using the example of the source category of electricity generation in LCP of the other industrial power plants with the fuel consumption of light heating oil (reference value: 103.2 kg / TJ) in (14), whereby the procedure is analogous for all other source categories. | ||
- | (14) NOx-emission (electicity generation in LCP of the other industiral power plants) = (85 mg/ | + | (7) implied |
+ | The implied emission factor for the sulphate process will be taken over from the 2022 submission in 2020. The new emission factor results from the emission factor according to the current status and the maximum emission value proposed in the optional amendment of the 13< | ||
- | **Reduction in gas and steam turbines through amendment of the 13< | + | (8) implied NOx emission factor (sulphate process) = (1.75 kg/t * 85 mg/Nm^3) / 217.78 mg/Nm3 = 0.68 kg/t |
- | In the case of LCPs with gas and steam turbines, the assumed requirement is a stricter limit value of 20 mg / Nm< | + | **NO< |
- | For GuD, the proportional NO<sub>X</sub> reductions | + | An optional amendment of the 13<sup>th</sup> BImSchV would lead to emission |
- | | + | For plants using raw petrol |
- | The calculation of the reductions from 2021 on in the area of gas turbines is considered analogous to that of GuD with a reduction of 30 per cent to 20 mg / Nm<sup>3</sup> NO< | + | (9) implied NOx emission factor (refinery underfiring |
- | (16) NOx-emission (gas turbines | + | This results |
+ | For a total of twelve plants with heavy fuel oil as fuel input the bell-rule is applied. First of all, the emission limit value according to the current 13< | ||
- | **Reduction of motorised private transport by strengthening the environmental alliance | + | |
- | The WAM scenario includes one further measure in the transport sector: the promotion | + | A calculated reduction |
- | **Reduction | + | The conversion is carried out in the same way for all source groups |
- | Basis for modeling of NH< | + | (11) NOx emission (refinery underfiring with light heating oil) = [400 mg/Nm^3 * (1 - 0.69)] / 3.39 = 36.5 kg/TJ |
- | In the projections of NAPCP 2019, two variants had been calculated | + | **NO< |
- | - The measures | + | Emissions from other LCPs, which emerge from the energy balances, but cannot be clearly assigned to a specific fuel use or fuel mix and also show a reduction potential by an optional amendment of the 13< |
- | - Small and very small farms are excluded from the measures. | + | |
- | Small farm exclusions resulted in mitigation being smaller by approx. | + | The NO< |
- | For calculating the emission mitigation potential in 2025 the assumptions for 2030 (described below) were assumed either | + | __Table 13: Estimated relative and absolute plant split of LCP according |
+ | ^ operation | ||
+ | | < 1500 h/a | 46573 | 17.8 % | | ||
+ | | > 1500 h/a | 214990 | ||
+ | | total | | ||
- | The inventory model can only calculate complete scenarios. The effect | + | The emission factors will be recalculated for 2025 to 2040. First, the limit value of 85 mg/ |
- | * 70 per cent of the cattle and pig slurry is digested | + | The calculation is shown using the example |
- | + | ||
- | * No use of broadcast application on uncultivated arable land and incorporation of liquid manure within an hour. This measure only affects liquid manure (slurry, leachate, digestates).\\ \\ __Assumptions to model the mitigation potential | + | |
- | * Uncovered external storage facilities for liquid manure / digestates are at least covered with a plastic film or comparable technology. A one-to-one implementation in inventory model GAS-EM is not possible, since for digestates only " | + | |
+ | **Increase in emissions due to the implementation of the proposed amendment of the Building Energy Act (GEG):** | ||
- | * Air scrubber systems in 75 per cent of the agricultural operations regulated under IED (permitted after type of procedure G in the 4< | + | The amendment |
+ | The calculation of the potential increase in emissions for the emission projections in 2023 was based upon a decision of the federal cabinet of April 19< | ||
- | * 75 per cent of the agricultural operations that are permitted after type of procedure V in the 4<sup>th</sup> BImSchV (smaller than IED operations) reduce 40 per cent through system-integrated measures in housing, 25 per cent of these operations do not reduce emissions.\\ \\ __Assumptions to model the mitigation potential in 2030:__ Agricultural operations (type of procedure V) reduce the emissions from housing by a total of 30 % (0.75 * 40 % + 0.25 * 0 % = 30 %). This was mathematically integrated into the measure above. This results in the following total housing reduction performances for the individual animal categories (rounded reduction percentages are shown, unrounded numbers were used for calculation): | + | __Table 14: Potential emission increases as a result |
- | * Sows: an effective emission reduction of 63.0 per cent was calculated for 54.2 per cent of the animals | + | ^ year ^ NO<sub>X</sub> ^ SO< |
- | * Weaners: an effective emission reduction of 59.4 per cent was calculated for 45.8 per cent of the animals | + | ^ 2025 | |
- | * Fattening pigs: an effective emission reduction of 59.4 per cent was calculated for 27.1 per cent of the animals | + | ^ 2030 | +7.1 kt | +0.7 kt | +4.5 kt | +1.2 kt | |
- | * Laying hens: an effective emission reduction of 53.2 per cent was calculated for 85.1 per cent of the animals | + | |
- | * Broilers: an effective emission reduction of 59.0 per cent was calculated for 92.8 per cent of the animals | + | |
- | * Pullets: an effective emission reduction of 58.9 per cent was calculated for 82.1 per cent of the animals | + | |
- | * Ducks: an effective emission reduction of 62.5 per cent was calculated for 20.6 per cent of the animals\\ \\ Calculated additional emission reduction in kt NH< | + | |
+ | Both the Building Energy Act (GEG) and the accompanying funding programme (BEG) were later adopted in the end of 2023 with less stricter requirements regarding dust emissions of solid biomass boilers. A consistent scenario quantifying the potential development of biomass use in the building sector is under preparation for the final NECP reporting in mid-2024. | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Emission reduction in small combustion installations by tightening the emission limits of the Ecodesign Regulations (EU) 2015/1185 and (EU) 2015/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | Through amendment of the Commission regulation (EU) 2015/1189 with regard to ecodesign requirements for solid fuel boilers, it was assumed that requirements for placing on the market and putting into service solid biomass boilers regarding emissions of particulate matter will be set at 2,5 mg/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | Through amendment of the Commission regulation (EU) 2015/1185 with regard to ecodesign requirements for solid fuel local space heaters, it was assumed that requirements for placing on the market and putting into service solid biomass local space heaters regarding emissions of particulate matter will be set at 20 mg/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | Considering these assumptions as well as the potentially increased biomass use described above, a potential emission reduction of 1.4 kt PM< | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Reduction in agriculture through a bundle of measures quantified as an agricultural package:** | ||
- | * 50 per cent of slurry storage underneath slatted floors is replaced by external storage | + | Despite compliance |
+ | * safety buffer due to the uncertainties of the assumed emission reductions in the WM scenario, | ||
+ | * safety buffer due to exceptions to various regulations for small and very small farms and | ||
+ | * compensation for the potentially increased ammonia emissions from a measure of the climate protection program 2030: 70 % of liquid manure from cattle and pig farming should be digested in biogas plants by 2030, which leads to potential additional emissions in 2030 compared to the WM scenario of 12.8 kt NH< | ||
- | * 5 per cent reduction of N excretion by protein-optimized feeding in cattle husbandry\\ \\ __Assumptions | + | For these reasons, three additional measures |
+ | //a) Increase in the share of technically gas-tight stored digestion residues to 100 % by 2030// | ||
- | *System-integrated measures in cattle housing | + | //b) System-integrated measures in dairy cattle housing |
+ | //c) Increased application of liquid manure on tilled fields or grassland with injection, slot technology or acidification technology// | ||
- | * Application | + | The expected ammonia emission reduction |
+ | The main uncertainty in the quantification of the reduction potential lies in the achievement of the assumed degree of implementation in practice by 2030. With the regular update of the emission projections for air pollutants for reporting in accordance with Directive (EU) 2016/2284 by March 15< | ||
- | * Organic farming on 20 per cent of the area (Measure 3.4.5.3 | + | In addition, |
- | + | ||
- | * Reduction of the N balance to 70 kg / ha (Measure 3.4.5.1 | + | |
+ | **Emission reduction in road transport through a bundle of measures quantified as a road transport package:** | ||
- | * Subtraction | + | The road transport package contains two single measures and one bundle |
+ | //a) introduction of Euro 7 standard// \\ In November 2022 the Commission published a proposal for a regulation “on type-approval of motor vehicles and engines and of systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles, with respect to their emissions and battery durability (Euro 7)”((https:// | ||
- | **Reduction in industrial processes | + | //b) expansion of the truck toll system// \\ The basis for quantification is the coalition agreement of 2021. It provides that the weight limit should be lowered to 3,5t, introduction of a CO< |
- | For the additional emission reduction of sulfur dioxide, the optional measure g) from the National Air Pollution Control Programme according | + | //c) package of measures |
+ | * Updating | ||
+ | * Purchase bonus for electric cars and promotion of fleet conversion | ||
+ | * Reduced taxation | ||
+ | * Development of a comprehensive, | ||
+ | * Tender from the BMDV and the federal Autobahn GmbH for the “Deutschlandnetz” | ||
+ | * Implementation of the federal government' | ||
+ | For other vehicle categories the share of electric vehicles | ||
+ | * New CO< | ||
+ | * Continuation of the promotion of light and heavy duty vehicles with alternative drives as well as the promotion of the development of the associated supply infrastructure for the fleet electrification | ||
+ | * Implementation of the Clean Vehicles Directive (CVD) (EU) 2019/1161 | ||
+ | * Continuation of the funding for zero-emission buses | ||
- | Since the first reduction effects are to be expected from 2025 on, it is assumed | + | The impact of all these interdependent measures |
+ | * The share of new registered BEV per year exceeds 50 % in 2024 and reaches 88 % in 2030 for passenger cars. The share of electric mileage in total mileage increases | ||
+ | * From 2034 for passenger cars and from 2035 for LDV it is assumed, that only electrical cars will be newly registered. However, it is conceivable that vehicles with combustion engines | ||
+ | * The overall particle emissions from road transport are assumed to slightly decrease until 2030, because | ||
- | (17) SO2-emission | + | The emission |
+ | __Table 15: Potential emission reductions of the road transport package compared to the WM scenario__ | ||
+ | ^ year ^ NO< | ||
+ | ^ 2025 | -3.7 kt | -0.1 kt | -2.4 kt | -0.7 kt | -0.2 kt | | ||
+ | ^ 2030 | -28.6 kt | -0.2 kt | -10.3 kt | -2.6 kt | -1.2 kt | | ||
- | The results as presented at the top of the page have been widely circulated and discussed with sector experts from industry, science and public authorities. | ||