meta data for this page
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
sector:other_and_natural_sources:other_sources:pets [2023/10/05 13:13] – [Recalculations] kotzulla | sector:other_and_natural_sources:other_sources:pets [2024/11/06 14:54] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
====Short description ==== | ====Short description ==== | ||
- | ^ NFR-Code ^ Name of category | + | In addition to non-agricultural sources |
- | | 6.A.2 | + | |
+ | This emission source ist taken into account for the first time with the current submission and with dogs and cats as the only two groups of pets covered so far. | ||
- | In addition to non-agricultural sources of ammonia (NH< | + | ^ Category Code |
+ | | 6.A.2 | T1 | NS | D | | ||
+ | | {{page> | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | | NO< | ||
+ | | NA | ||
+ | | {{page> | ||
==== Methodology ==== | ==== Methodology ==== | ||
Line 14: | Line 20: | ||
- | <WRAP center round info 50%> | + | <WRAP center round info 40%> |
- | **EM** = **AD** | + | <m>EM = AD_(number of pets) * EF_(kg ammonia per animal |
</ | </ | ||
===Activity data === | ===Activity data === | ||
- | As there are no official statistics on pets in Germany, data of a representative | + | As there are no official statistics on pets in Germany, data from repeated |
The latest EMEP EEA Guidebook refers to European statistics. | The latest EMEP EEA Guidebook refers to European statistics. | ||
The figures for 2021 and 2022 are consistent with those in the publication mentioned above and according to the 2023 Guidebook only the main categories cats (39% by animal catory) and dogs (27% by animal catory) were considered. | The figures for 2021 and 2022 are consistent with those in the publication mentioned above and according to the 2023 Guidebook only the main categories cats (39% by animal catory) and dogs (27% by animal catory) were considered. | ||
- | Time series for the main animal | + | Time series for the main categories of pets are obtained by the numbers of the survey for the years 2012 to 2022. |
Data for 1990 are estimated retrospectively using the number of households (see also [[https:// | Data for 1990 are estimated retrospectively using the number of households (see also [[https:// | ||
Line 64: | Line 70: | ||
====Emission Trend==== | ====Emission Trend==== | ||
- | The following figure shows the development of emissions for the pet-categories dogs (EM< | + | The following figure shows the development of emissions for the pet-categories dogs (EM< |
- | + | ||
- | In recent years, an increasing trend can be observed, resulting in a mean value (between 2020 to 2022) of NH< | + | |
- | + | ||
- | Figure 1: Ammonia emissions from pets | + | |
- | + | ||
- | {{ : | + | |
+ | {{ : | ||
+ | In recent years, an increasing trend can be observed, resulting in a mean value (between 2020 to 2022) of 9.92 kt NH< | ||
===== Recalculations ===== | ===== Recalculations ===== | ||
- | <WRAP center round info 60%> | + | <WRAP center round info 65%> |
- | As these emissions are reported for the first time, no recalculations occur against the previous submission. | + | As these **emissions are reported for the first time**, no recalculations occur against the previous submission. |
</ | </ | ||
Line 85: | Line 87: | ||
There is no information on the uncertainty of the emission factors. | There is no information on the uncertainty of the emission factors. | ||
- | However, uncertainties are expected to be relatively high, as EF vary between different sources and the amount of ammonia volatilized is based on an assumption. | + | However, as EF vary between different sources and the amount of ammonia volatilized is based on an assumption, EF uncertainties are expected to be relatively high. |
Therefore, an uncertainty of 50% for half the 95-percent confidence-interval (normal distribution) is assumed. | Therefore, an uncertainty of 50% for half the 95-percent confidence-interval (normal distribution) is assumed. | ||