meta data for this page
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| sector:agriculture:start [2026/03/31 09:36] – [Short description] kotzulla | sector:agriculture:start [2026/04/01 13:04] (current) – [Specific QA/QC procedures for the agriculture sector] kotzulla | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| Emissions occurring in the agricultural sector in Germany derive from manure management (NFR 3.B), agricultural soils (NFR 3.D) and agriculture other (NFR 3.I). | Emissions occurring in the agricultural sector in Germany derive from manure management (NFR 3.B), agricultural soils (NFR 3.D) and agriculture other (NFR 3.I). | ||
| - | As burning of agricultural residues is prohibited by law (see Vos et al., 2026)((Vos, C., Rösemann, C., Haenel, H.-D., Dämmgen, U., Döring, U., Wulf, S., Eurich-Menden, | + | As burning of agricultural residues is prohibited by law (see Vos et al., 2026)[(VOSETAL2026)], Germany does not report emissions in category field burning (NFR 3.F) (notation key: ' |
| The pollutants reported are: | The pollutants reported are: | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
| No heavy metal emissions are reported. | No heavy metal emissions are reported. | ||
| - | In 2024, the agricultural sector emitted 484.0 kt of NH< | + | In 2024, the agricultural sector emitted 484.0 kt of NH< |
| - | As depicted in the diagram | + | The trends from 1990 onwards is shown in the graph at the bottom of this page. Here, the sharp decrease of emissions from 1990 to 1991 is due to a reduction of livestock population in the New Länder (former GDR) following the German reunification. The increase of NH< |
| + | |||
| + | As depicted in the chart below, in 2024 91.7 % of Germany’s total NH< | ||
| ====Mitigation measures==== | ====Mitigation measures==== | ||
| Line 46: | Line 48: | ||
| * covering of slurry storage: agricultural censuses survey the prevalence of different slurry covers. Germany uses distinct emission factors for the different covers. | * covering of slurry storage: agricultural censuses survey the prevalence of different slurry covers. Germany uses distinct emission factors for the different covers. | ||
| - | * use of urease inhibitors: for urea fertilizer the German fertilizer ordinance prescribes the use of urease inhibitors or the direct incorporation into the soil from 2020 onwards. The NH< | + | * use of urease inhibitors: for urea fertilizer the German fertilizer ordinance prescribes the use of urease inhibitors or the direct incorporation into the soil from 2020 onwards. The NH< |
| For NO< | For NO< | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
| - | (see [[general: | + | (see [[general: |
| - | The following list summarizes the most important reasons for recalculations. Recalculations result from improvements in input data and methodologies (for details see Vos et al. (2026), Chapter 1.3). | + | The following list summarizes the most important reasons for recalculations. Recalculations result from improvements in input data and methodologies (for details see Vos et al. (2026), Chapter 1.3)[(VOSETAL2026)]. |
| - Adding of a transport module in the inventory model PY-GAS-EM: substrate transports to biogas plants and manure transports across district borders (NUTS 3 areas) are considered. Since manure application techniques differ between the NUTS 3 areas, this leads to slightly different NH< | - Adding of a transport module in the inventory model PY-GAS-EM: substrate transports to biogas plants and manure transports across district borders (NUTS 3 areas) are considered. Since manure application techniques differ between the NUTS 3 areas, this leads to slightly different NH< | ||
| - | - Mineral fertilizers: | + | - Mineral fertilizers: |
| - Dairy cows: N and TAN excretions are now estimated from milk yield, milk urea content and protein content of milk instead of from the modeled feed. | - Dairy cows: N and TAN excretions are now estimated from milk yield, milk urea content and protein content of milk instead of from the modeled feed. | ||
| - Dairy cows: The officially recorded final milk yields for 2023 are significantly higher than the preliminary official figures used in the 2025 submission. This is due to an improved calculation method that will continue to be used in the future and which was subsequently applied for 2022. For reporting purposes a method was developed to adjust the officially recorded milk yields for the years before 2022 upwards, to achieve time series consistency. | - Dairy cows: The officially recorded final milk yields for 2023 are significantly higher than the preliminary official figures used in the 2025 submission. This is due to an improved calculation method that will continue to be used in the future and which was subsequently applied for 2022. For reporting purposes a method was developed to adjust the officially recorded milk yields for the years before 2022 upwards, to achieve time series consistency. | ||
| Line 101: | Line 101: | ||
| Furthermore, | Furthermore, | ||
| + | [(VOSETAL2026> | ||
| + | |||
| + | [(BITTMANETAL2014> | ||
| + | |||
| + | [(EMEPEEA2013> | ||
| + | |||
| + | [(EMEPEEA2023> | ||
| + | |||
| + | [(UBA2026> | ||
| + | |||
| + | [(STEHFESTBOUWMAN2006> | ||