meta data for this page
  •  

This is an old revision of the document!


1.A.3.a - Transport: Civil Aviation

Short description

NFR-Code Name of Category Method AD EF Key Category Analysis
1.A.3.a Civil Aviation see sub-category details
consisting of / including source categories
LTO-range: Included in National Totals
1.A.3.a i (i) International Civil Aviation - LTO see sub-category details
1.A.3.a ii (i) Domestic Civil Aviation - LTO see sub-category details
Cruise phase: Not included in National Totals
1.A.3.a i (ii) International Civil Aviation - Cruise see sub-category details
1.A.3.a ii (ii) Domestic Civil Aviation - Cruise see sub-category details


Air transports differ significantly from land and water transports with respect to emissions production. In air transports, fuels are burned under atmospheric conditions that a) differ markedly from those prevailing at ground level and b) can vary widely.

The main factors that influence the combustion process in this sector include atmospheric pressure, environmental temperature and humidity – all of which are factors that vary considerably with altitude.

In category 1.A.3.a - Civil Aviation the emissions from both national (domestic) and international civil aviation are reported with separate acquisition of flight phases LTO (Landing/Take-off: 0-3,000 feet) and Cruise (above 3,000 feet) where only emissions from LTO from both national and international flights have to be included in the national totals.

Emissions from military aircraft are not included in this category but are reported under military airborne combustion in NFR sub-category 1.A.5.b ii.

Country specifics: The use of aviation gasoline is assumed to take place within the LTO-range of domestic flights only (below 3,000 feet). This assumption is a compromise due to a lack of further information and data.

Methodology

NOTE: Data available from Eurocontrol via the European Environment Agency (EEA) is not being used for inventory compilation. Nonetheless, depending on its timeliness, it is taken into account for verification purposes.

Estimation of aircraft emissions has been carried out using a tier 3a approach, i.e. under consideration of the annual distances flown by different types of aircraft, deviated into domestic and international flights, also considering the different flight stages L/TO cycle (Landing/Take-off cycle, i.e. aircraft movements below 3,000 feet or about 915 meters of altitude) and cruise.

Essential for emissions reporting is the separation of domestic and international air traffic. This happens using a so-called split factor representing the ratio of fuel consumption for national flights and the over-all consumption.

For determination of this ratio, results from TREMOD AV (TRansport Emissions MODel AViation) have been used, based on the great circle distances flown by the different types of aircraft (Allekotte et al. (2025) 1). Here, the ratio is calculated on the basis of statistics on numbers of national and international flights departing from German airports provided by the Federal Statistical Office (Statistisches Bundesamt).

For further dividing kerosene consumption onto flight stages LTO and cruise, again results calculated within the TREMOD AV data base based on data provided by the Federal Statistical Office have been used.

Emissions are being estimated by multiplying the kerosene consumption of the flight stage with specific emission factors (EF). Here, emissions of SO2 are independent from the method used, depending only on the quantity and qualities of the fuel used. In contrast, emissions of NOx, NMVOC, and CO strongly depend on the types of engines, flight elevations, flight stage, etc. and can be estimated more precisely with higher tiers. The emission factors for NOx, CO, and NMVOC are therefore computed within TREMOD AV.

The aviation gasoline (avgas) used is not added to the annual kerosene consumptions but reported separately. As proposed in (IPCC, 2006a) 2), emissions caused by the incineration of avgas are calculated using adapted EF and calorific values following a tier1 approach.

For further information on AD (entire time series), EF, key sources, and recalculations see sub-chapters linked above.

Activity Data

Emissions estimation is mainly based on consumption data for jet kerosene and aviation gasoline as provided in the national Energy Balances (AGEB, 2025) 3). For very recent years with no AGEB data available (Normally the last year of the period reported.) data provided by the Federal Office of Economics and Export Control (BAFA) 4) is being used.

Table 1: Sources for 1.A.3.a activity data

through 1994 AGEB - National Energy Balance, line 76: 'Luftverkehr'
from 1995 AGEB - National Energy Balance, line 63: 'Luftverkehr'
recent years / comparison BAFA - Official oil data, table 7j: 'An die Luftfahrt' + 'An Sonstige'1
1 to achieve consistency with AGEB data, amounts given for deliveries 'to Aviation' ('An die Luftfahrt') and 'to Others' ('An Sonstige') have to be added (see FAQs for more information)


Table 2: Total inland fuel deliveries to civil aviation, in terajoules

1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Kerosene 193,329 233,437 297,258 343,828 361,751 361,651 389,024 425,140 437,203 434,490 199,931 257,520 384,975 401,833 385,857
Avgas 2,438 1,142 1,120 697 567 569 418 415 400 328 214 159 175 133 169
1.A.3.a 195,767 234,579 298,378 344,525 362,319 362,220 389,443 425,555 437,604 434,818 200,145 257,679 385,151 401,965 386,027
source: Working Group on Energy Balances (AGEB): National Energy Balances (AGEB, 2025) 5)


For the present purposes, kerosene-consumption figures from NEB and BAFA statistics have to be broken down by national (= domestic) and international flights: Here, the split has been calculated on the basis of statistics on numbers of national and international flights departing from German airports provided by the Federal Statistical Office (Statistisches Bundesamt) within TREMOD AV 6).

Table 3: Ratios for calculating the shares of fuels used in 1.A.3.a ii - Domestic and 1.A.3.a i - International Civil Aviation, in %

1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
1.A.3.a ii - Civil domestic aviation
Kerosene 15.3 12.8 11.0 8.80 8.35 7.63 7.14 6.34 6.14 6.38 6.18 3.70 3.61 3.65 3.81
Avgas 86.0 85.9 86.1 86.2 86.3 86.2 97.3 97.0 96.5 96.2 97.5 92.8 92.8 79.2 80.5
1.A.3.a i - Civil international aviation
Kerosene 84.7 87.2 89.0 91.2 91.6 92.4 92.9 93.7 93.9 93.6 93.8 96.3 96.4 96.3 96.2
Avgas 14.0 14.1 13.9 13.8 13.7 13.8 2.66 3.00 3.53 3.80 2.54 7.22 7.20 20.8 19.5


Table 4: Resulting annual shares of jet kerosene and avgas used in 1.A.3.a ii - Domestic and 1.A.3.a i - International Civil Aviation, in [TJ]

1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
1.A.3.a ii - Civil domestic aviation
Kerosene 29,501 29,989 32,746 30,260 30,210 27,605 27,783 26,935 26,843 27,739 12,354 9,541 13,914 14,676 14,710
Avgas 2,098 981 964 601 489 491 407 403 386 316 208 147 163 105 136
1.A.3.a i - Civil international aviation
Kerosene 163,828 203,448 264,512 313,568 331,542 334,046 361,241 398,205 410,360 406,750 187,577 247,979 371,062 387,156 371,147
Avgas 340 161 156 96 78 78.6 11.1 12.5 14.1 12.5 5.43 11.5 12.6 27.6 33.1
1.A.3.a - OVER-ALL
Kerosene 193,329 233,437 297,258 343,828 361,751 361,651 389,024 425,140 437,203 434,490 199,931 257,520 384,975 401,833 385,857
Avgas 2,438 1,142 1,120 697 567 569 418 415 400 328 214 159 175 133 169


The deviation of the kerosene consumed onto the two flight stages L/TO and cruise again has been carried based on TREMOD AV estimations allowing the export of kerosene consumption during L/TO for both domestic and international flights.

Table 5: Annual shares of L/TO stage in domestic and international civil aviation, in %

1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
1.A.3.a i 7.55 8.25 7.42 7.13 7.59 8.37 8.01 7.44 7.43 7.71 7.25 6.08 6.14 6.53 6.14
1.A.3.a ii 30.0 29.3 27.8 27.5 27.5 27.6 28.0 28.1 28.3 28.1 27.5 32.9 31.8 28.5 31.8
source: number of domestic and international flights as provided by the Federal Statistical Office (Destatis, 2025) 7), compiled and computed within 8)
a assumption: all aircraft using aviation gasoline are operated within the L/TO-range below 3,000 feet and only for domestic flights


Cruise consumption is then calculated as Total inland deliveries minus consumption druing L/TO.

Emission factors

Kerosene

Emissions have been calculated for each flight phase, based on the respective emission factors. Therefore, the EF used have been taken from a wide range of different sources. In contrast to earlier submissions, the emissions of NOx, CO und HC are based on aircraft-specific EF deposited within TREMOD AV. With this very detailed estimations average EF are being formed which are than used for emissions reporting.

The EF provided with the current submission represent annual average EF for the entire fleet, calculated as implied EF from the emissions computed within TREMOD AV and therefore differ from the values used in the past.

Sulphur dioxide (SO2) emissions depend directly on the kerosene's sulphur content which varies regionally as well as seasonally. The EF used by Eurocontrol of 0.84 kg SO2/t kerosene lies between the values used for German inventory for 1990 to 1994 (1.08 to 1.03 kg SO2/t) and from 1995 (0.4 kg SO2/t). In IPCC 2006b 9) with 1 kg SO2/t kerosene value comes very close to the old inventory values provided, based on a sulfur content of 0.05 % of weight. Following current information of the expert committee for the standardization of mineral oil and fuels (Fachausschuss für Mineralöl-und Brennstoffnormung, FAM), the common value for sulphur content of kerosene in Germany is about 0.01% of weight, i.e. one fifth of the IPCC data. In IIR 2009, a sulfur content of 0.021 weight% have been used, based on measurements from 1998 (Döpelheuer (2002)) 10).

As an EF decreasing due to improved production procedures and stricter critical levels seems plausible, for this report a constant decline between the annual values of 1.08 g SO2/kg for 1990, 0.4 g for 1998 and 0.2 g for 2009 has been assumed. Thereby, an exhaustive conversion of the sulfur into suflur dioxide is expected. - Due to the EF depending directly on the S content of the kerosene, one annual EF is used for both flight stages.

Nitrogen oxide (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO) and hydrocarbons (HC) emissions were estimated using IEF calculated within TREMOD AV, based upon more specific (depending on type of aircraft, flight stage) EF mostly taken from the EMEP-EEA data base. For 2009, 40 % of over-all starts (about 70 % of total kilometres flown) had to be linked with adapted EF as it was not possible to directly or even indirectly (via similar types of aircraft) allocate the aircraft used here. Therefore, regression analysis had to be carried out, estimating EF via emission functions that calculate an EF for the respective type of engine depending on the particular take-off weight.

As a basis for these functions the EF of types of aircraft with given EF have been used (see: Allekotte et al. (2024)) 11). From the trend of the emissions calculated within TREMOD AV, annual average EF for the entire fleet have been formed, which have then been used for reporting. Hence, the EF differ widely from those used in earlier submissions.

Ammonia (NH3) emissions were estimated using an EF of 0.173 g/kg kerosene for both flight stages (UBA, 2009) 12).

The EFs for non-methane volatile organic compounds (NMVOC) were calculated as the difference between the EF for over-all hydrocarbons (HC) and the EF for methane (CH4).

Particulate Matter Within the IPCC EF data base, there are no default data provided for emissions of particulate matter (TSP, PM10, and PM2.5). Therefore, the EF for dust (Total Suspended Particulate Matter – TSP) are taken over from Corinair (2006) 13), giving specific values for an average fleet and for the two flight stages in table 8.2: For national flights 0.7 kg TSP/LTO and 0.2 kg TSP/t kerosene and 0.15 kg TSP/LTO and 0.2 kg TSP/t kerosene for international flights. Following this table, a kerosene consumption per LTO cycle of 825 kg for national and 1,617 kg for international flights have been assumed and the EF for the LTO stage have been estimated.

Regarding Black Carbon, f-BC fractions from EMEP/EEA guidebook 2023, Chapter 1.A.3.a, 1.A.5 - Aviation, Annex 3, Table A3.2 and Conclusion have been applied for both jet kerosene and aviation gasoline. (EMEP/EEA, 2023) 14)

As for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), tier1 EF from (EMEP/EEA, 2019) 15) have been apllied here. As the EMEP guidebook does not provide original EF for jet kerosene, values provided for gasoline in road transport have been used here as a proxy and will be replaced by more appropriate data as soon as this is available.

The conversion of EF representing emissions per kilo fuel combusted [kg pollutant/kg kerosene] into energy related EF [kg pollutant/TJ energy] has been carried out using a net calorific value of 43,000 kJ/kg.

Aviation gasoline

For aviation gasoline (avgas) a deviation onto LTO and cruise is assumed to be unnecessary. Therefore, there are no such specific EF used here. As for kerosene, the EF for NOx, CO and HC have been taken from the calculations carried out within TREMOD AV. Here, for calculating aircraft specific NOx, CO, and HC emissions corresponding EF from the EMEP-EEA data base have been used that have than been divided by the annual avgas consumption to form annual average EF for emission reporting.

With respect to fuel characteristics, there are no big differences between avgas and gasoline used in passenger cars (PC). Therefore, specific sulphur dioxide (SO2) emissions from PC gasoline can be carried forward to avgas. - Following the expert committee for the standardization of mineral oil and fuels (FAM), the critical value of sulfur content for gasoline sold at gas stations is 10 mg/kg, i.e. 0,001 % of weight - or one tenth of the kerosene value. Therefore, the EF used for avgas equals the EF used for kerosene reduced by 90 %.

There are different sorts of avgas sold with different lead (Pb) contents. As an exact annual ration of the sorts sold is not available, the most common type of avgas (AvGas 100 LL (Low Lead)) with a lead content of 0.56 g/l is set as an approximation. (see EMEP/EEA (2023), Chapter 1.A.3.a, 1.A.5.b Aviation, Annex 2, page 44, Table A2.1 16)

The EF(TSP) were calculated from the lead content of AvGas 100 LL by multiplication with a factor 1.6 as used for leaded gasoline in road transport in the TREMOD system.

For NMVOC, an emission factor from the Revised IPCC Guidelines 1996 (pages I 42 and 40) 17), 18) is used.

All other emission factors are not available specifically for small aircraft and therefore have been equalized with the EF used for kerosene, national, cruise.

The conversion of the emission factors from [kg emission/kg avgas consumed] into [kg emission/TJ energy converted] has been carried out using a net calorific value of 44,300 kJ/kg.

NOTE: For the country-specific emission factors applied for particulate matter, no clear indication is available, whether or not condensables are included.
For information on the emission factors for heavy-metal and POP exhaust emissions, please refer to Appendix 2.3 - Heavy Metal (HM) exhaust emissions from mobile sources and Appendix 2.4 - Persistent Organic Pollutant (POP) exhaust emissions from mobile sources.

Recalculations

Total jet kerosene inland deliveries remainig unchanged for all years but 2023 within the National Energy Balances. On the other hand, avgas inland deliveries were revised for all years as of 2003 within the same National Energy Balances.

Table 7: Revised total annual inland deliveries of jet kerosene and avgas as provided in NEB line 63, in terajoules [TJ]

2003 2005 2010 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
JET KEROSENE
current submission 290,470 343,828 361,751 361,651 389,024 425,140 437,203 434,490 199,931 257,520 384,975 401,833
previous submission 290,470 343,828 361,751 361,651 389,024 425,140 437,203 434,490 199,931 257,520 384,975 402,121
absolute change 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -289
relative change 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% -0.07%
AVGAS
current submission 765 697 567 569 418 415 400 328 214 159 175 133
previous submission 766 698 568 570 419 415 401 328 214 159 175 130
absolute change -0.48 -0.43 -0.35 -0.35 -0.26 -0.26 -0.25 -0.20 -0.13 -0.10 -0.11 3.05
relative change -0.06% -0.06% -0.06% -0.06% -0.06% -0.06% -0.06% -0.06% -0.06% -0.06% -0.06% 2.34%


Furthermore, the domestic share of total kerosene consumption was revised for 2023 and based on slightly revised background data for this specific year computed within the underlying model, TREMOD Aviation:

Table 8: Revised percental share of kerosene used for domestic flights in 2023, in %

current submission 3.6523
previous submission 3.6497
absolute change 0.0026
relative change 0.07%


As a result, the amounts of jet kerosene allocated to NFR sub-categories 1.A.3.a i and 1.A.3.a ii and for 2023 had to be revised accordingly. Here, the activity data allocated to NFR 1.A.3.a i was reduced by the same amount by which the activity data allocated to NFR 1.A.3.a ii was increased:

Table 9: Revised amounts of fuel allocated to international (1.A.3.a i) and domestic (1.A.3.a ii) flights, in [TJ]

2003 2005 2010 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
1.A.3.a i - Civil international aviation
JET KEROSENE
current submission 260,237 313,568 331,542 334,046 361,241 398,205 410,360 406,750 187,577 247,979 371,062 387,156
previous submission 260,237 313,568 331,542 334,046 361,241 398,205 410,360 406,750 187,577 247,979 371,062 387,445
absolute change 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -289
relative change 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% -0.07%
AVGAS
current submission 106 96.2 77.9 78.6 11.1 12.5 14.1 12.5 5.43 11.5 12.6 27.6
previous submission 106 96.3 78.0 78.6 11.1 12.5 14.1 12.5 5.43 11.5 12.6 27.0
absolute change -0.066 -0.060 -0.048 -0.049 -0.007 -0.008 -0.009 -0.008 -0.003 -0.007 -0.008 0.633
relative change -0.06% -0.06% -0.06% -0.06% -0.06% -0.06% -0.06% -0.06% -0.06% -0.06% -0.06% 2.34%
1.A.3.a ii - Civil domestic aviation
JET KEROSENE
current submission 30,233 30,260 30,210 27,605 27,783 26,935 26,843 27,739 12,354 9,541 13,914 14,676
previous submission 30,233 30,260 30,210 27,605 27,783 26,935 26,843 27,739 12,354 9,541 13,914 14,676
absolute change 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
relative change 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
AVGAS
current submission 660 601 489 491 407 403 386 316 208 147 163 105
previous submission 660 601 490 491 407 403 386 316 209 147 163 103
absolute change -0.41 -0.37 -0.30 -0.31 -0.25 -0.25 -0.24 -0.20 -0.13 -0.09 -0.10 2.41
relative change -0.06% -0.06% -0.06% -0.06% -0.06% -0.06% -0.06% -0.06% -0.06% -0.06% -0.06% 2.34%

For pollutant-specific information on recalculated emission estimates for Base Year and 2023, please see the recalculation tables following chapter 9.1 - Recalculations.

Planned improvements

Besides the routine revision of the underlying model, no specific improvements are planned.

Uncertainties

Uncertainty estimates for both activity data and emission factors were newly evaluated during the research project FKZ 3720 51 502 0: “Neubewertung der Unsicherheiten der mit den zurBerechnung der Luftschadstoffemissionen im Verkehrssektor verwendeten Parameter und Methoden” by Allekotte et al. with the final report published in 2023 19).

The uncertainty of the activity data is calculated via error propagation taking into accont the uncertainties of “incomplete data collection” (within the provider of the sales staistics, BAFA), “measurement uncertainty” and “attribution accuracy.” Based on information from BAFA, it is assumed that the standard deviation for the data collection is 0.51% (normal distribution)20). Regarding the measurement uncertainty, and using the 99.5% confidence interval to ensure compliance with the measurement tolerance and further assuming a normal distribution, a standard deviation of 0.2% can be obtained21). Finally, regarding the accuracy of the distribution, a standard deviation of 0.55% (normal distribution) is derived22).

Taking into account the three uncertainties mentioned above, as well as the uncertainty regarding the calorific value, the relative uncertainties of sales in civil aviation can be derived using a Monte Carlo simulation (95% confidence interval) 23):

jet kerosene +2.06 % -0.44%
aviation gasoline +2.67 % -0.20%


Due to the relatively low assumed calorific value in TREMOD, a skewed distribution function is obtained, tending towards higher values. For simplicity, a triangular distribution is assumed in the results.

FAQs

Whereby does the party justify the adding-up of the two amounts provided by BAFA as deliveries 'An die Luftfahrt' and 'An Sonstige' ?

For mineral oils, German National Energy Balances (NEBs) - amongst other sources - are based on BAFA data on the amounts delivered to different sectors. A comparison with consumption data from AGEB and BAFA shows that data from NEB line 76 /63: 'Luftverkehr' equals to the amount added from both columns provided by BAFA 24).

On which basis does the party estimate the reported lead emissions from aviation gasoline?

assumption by party: aviation gasoline = AvGas 100 LL (see EMEP/EEA (2023): Chapter 1.A.3.a, 1.A.5.b Aviation, Annex 2, page 44, Table A2.1) 25) (AvGas 100 LL is the predominant sort of aviation gasoline in Western Europe) 26) lead content of AvGas 100 LL: 0.56 g lead/liter (as tetra ethyl lead) 27)

The applied procedure is similar to the one used for calculating lead emissions from leaded gasoline used in road transport. (There, in contrast to aviation gasoline, the lead content constantly declined resulting in a ban of leaded gasoline in 1997.)

On which basis does the party estimate the reported TSP emissions from aviation gasoline?

The TSP emissions calculated depend directly on the reported lead emissions: The emission factor for TSP is 1.6 times the emission factor used for lead: EF(TSP) = 1.6 x EF(Pb). The applied procedure is similar to the one used for calculating TSP emissions from leaded gasoline used in road transport.


2) IPCC (2006b): Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: IPCC emission factor data base; URL: http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/EFDB/main.php
3), 5) AGEB (2025): Working Group on Energy Balances (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Energiebilanzen (Hrsg.), AGEB): Energiebilanz für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland; https://ag-energiebilanzen.de/wp-content/uploads/EBD23e.xlsx, (Aufruf: 04.12.2025), Köln & Berlin, September 2025
4), 24) BAFA (2025): Federal Office of Economics and Export Control (Bundesamt für Wirtschaft und Ausfuhrkontrolle, BAFA): Amtliche Mineralöldaten für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland; https://www.bafa.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/Energie/Mineraloel/moel_amtliche_daten_2024_12.html, Eschborn, 2025.
6), 8), 20), 21), 22), 23) Allekotte et al. (2025): TREMOD Aviation (TREMOD AV) - Revision des Modells zur Berechnung des Flugverkehrs (TREMOD-AV). Ifeu Institut für Energie- und Umweltforschung Heidelberg GmbH & Öko-Institut e.V., on behalf of the Umweltbundesamt, Heidelberg & Berlin / Dessau-Roßlau, 2025.
10) Doepelheuer, A. (2002): Anwendungsorientierte Verfahren zur Bestimmung von CO, HC und Ruß aus Luftfahrttriebwerken, Dissertationsschrift des DLR, Institut für Antriebstechnik, https://elib.dlr.de/49148/, ISSN: 1434-8454, Köln, 2002.
13) CORINAIR, 2006 - EMEP/CORINAIR Emission Inventory Guidebook - 2006, EEA technical report No. 11/2006; Dezember 2006, Kopenhagen, 2006 URL: http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/EMEPCORINAIR4
17) Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines, Volume 3: Reference Manual, Chapter I: Energy; URL: http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/gl/guidelin/ch1ref2.pdf, p. I.40
18) Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines, Volume 3: Reference Manual, Chapter I: Energy; http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/gl/guidelin/ch1ref3.pdf, p. I.42
19) Allekotte et al. (2023): Allekotte, M., Knörr, W., Kräck, J. (ifeu, Heidelberg) with Notter, B., Schäppi, B., Soini, M. (INFRAS, Bern) and Hausberger, S., Tödling, M., Schadler, D. (FVT, Graz): Neubewertung der Unsicherheiten der mit den zur Berechnung der Luftschadstoffemissionen im Verkehrssektor verwendeten Parameter und Methoden“ (“Reassessment of the uncertainties of the parameters and methods used to calculate air pollutant emissions in the transport sector”), Institut für Energie- und Umweltforschung Heidelberg gGmbH (ifeu), INFRAS AG Bern, FVT – Forschungsgesellschaft für Verbrennungskraftmaschinen und Thermodynamik mbH Graz; UBA TEXTE 152/2023, Forschungskennzahl 3720 51 502 0 - FB001047, ISSN 1862-4804, https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/system/files/medien/11850/publikationen/152_2023_texte_neubewertung_der_unsicherheiten.pdf, on behalf of the Umweltbundesamt, Dessau-Roßlau, November 2023