meta data for this page
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| sector:ippu:chemical_industry:other:start [2025/10/21 14:31] – [Urea production] zheng | sector:ippu:chemical_industry:other:start [2026/03/13 09:19] (current) – [Table] kotzulla | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| | [[# | | [[# | ||
| {{page> | {{page> | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | | NO< | ||
| + | | NA | ||
| + | | {{page> | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| ===== Method ===== | ===== Method ===== | ||
| Line 64: | Line 72: | ||
| The figures for carbon black production in the new German Länder in 1990 were taken from the Statistical Yearbook (Statistisches Jahrbuch) for the Federal Republic of Germany; the production for 1991 and 1992 were estimated, due to confidentiality requirements. The other data for carbon-black production as of 1990 were obtained from national production statistics. \\ \\ | The figures for carbon black production in the new German Länder in 1990 were taken from the Statistical Yearbook (Statistisches Jahrbuch) for the Federal Republic of Germany; the production for 1991 and 1992 were estimated, due to confidentiality requirements. The other data for carbon-black production as of 1990 were obtained from national production statistics. \\ \\ | ||
| - | From 2005 onwards, Germany uses activity data, which is calculated from the CO< | + | From 2005 onwards, Germany uses activity data, which is calculated from the CO< |
| __Table 4: Emission factors of carbon black in Germany, in kg/t__ | __Table 4: Emission factors of carbon black in Germany, in kg/t__ | ||
| Line 119: | Line 127: | ||
| The activity data for sulphuric acid production is from the Federal Statistical Office of Germany. | The activity data for sulphuric acid production is from the Federal Statistical Office of Germany. | ||
| - | For the SO< | + | A survey for the EF of SO< |
| - | All emissions were measured by the producers respectively or limit values are specified in the permit decision for the installation. The derived (implied) EF is weighted by the amount of H< | + | All emissions were measured by the producers respectively or limit values are specified in the permit decision for the installation. The derived (implied) EF is weighted by the amount of H< |
| - | However, due to significant process optimizations and technology improvements implemented since 1990, the country-specific EF applied | + | However, due to significant process optimizations and technology improvements implemented since 1990, the applied |
| ==== Chlor-alkali industry ==== | ==== Chlor-alkali industry ==== | ||
| Line 129: | Line 137: | ||
| For the mercury (Hg) losses from the Chlor-alkali industry, Germany used to apply the data annualy published by OSPAR [(ODIMS (OSPAR Data & Information Management System); https:// | For the mercury (Hg) losses from the Chlor-alkali industry, Germany used to apply the data annualy published by OSPAR [(ODIMS (OSPAR Data & Information Management System); https:// | ||
| - | Because of the BAT (best available technique) conclusion for the Chlor-alkali industry, the production based upon the amalgam process | + | Because of the BAT (best available technique) conclusion for the Chlor-alkali industry, the production based upon the amalgam process stopped in 2017. Most production sites have switched to membrane technology. |
| - | However, Hg emissions are still ocurring because two production sites still continue to use the amalgam process for the production of certain alcoholates not regulated by the BAT conclusions for Chlor-alkali production. Before 2018, these Hg-emissions were reported together with the Hg from Chlor-alkali production. But the OSPAR convention does not request the Hg emissions from alcoholate production to be reported, so CEFIC does no longer | + | However, Hg emissions are still ocurring because two production sites still continue to use the amalgam process for the production of certain alcoholates, which is not regulated by the BAT conclusions for Chlor-alkali production. Before 2018, these Hg-emissions were reported together with the Hg from Chlor-alkali production. But the OSPAR convention does not request the Hg emissions from alcoholate production to be reported, so CEFIC no longer |
| - | Therfore, as of 2018, PRTR data is used to determine mercury emissions | + | Therfore, as of 2018, PRTR data has been used to determine mercury emissions |