meta data for this page
  •  

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
sector:other_and_natural_sources:natural_sources:other [2025/04/16 09:11] – [Table] kotzullasector:other_and_natural_sources:natural_sources:other [2026/03/25 14:22] (current) – [Table] kotzulla
Line 35: Line 35:
 |  {{page>general:Misc:LegendEIT:start}}                        |||| |  {{page>general:Misc:LegendEIT:start}}                        ||||
 \\ \\
-^  NO<sub>x</sub>                                                                    |  NMVOC  |  SO<sub>2</sub>  | NH<sub>3</sub>  |  PM<sub>2.5</sub>  |  PM<sub>10</sub>  | TSP  |  BC  |  CO  |  Heavy Metals                                  |||||||||  POPs  | +^  NO<sub>x</sub>                                                                    |  NMVOC  |  SO<sub>2</sub>  | NH<sub>3</sub>  |  PM<sub>2.5</sub>  |  PM<sub>10</sub>  | TSP  |  BC  |  CO  |  Heavy Metals                          |||||||||  POPs  | 
-^  -/-                                                                               |  NA     |  NA              |  NA             |  NA                |  NA               |  NA  |  NA  |  NA  |  NA                                            |||||||||  NA    | +|  -/-                                                                               |  NA     |  NA              |  NA             |  NA                |  NA               |  NA  |  NA  |  NA  |  NA                                    |||||||||  NA    | 
-|  //This memo item source category is not included in the key category analysis.//                                                                                                                                                               |||||||||||||||||||+|  //This memo item source category is not included in the key category analysis.//                                                                                                                                                       |||||||||||||||||||
 \\ \\
  
Line 48: Line 48:
 For the complete time series, the emissions are calculated as follows:  For the complete time series, the emissions are calculated as follows: 
  
-<WRAP center round info 50%> + 
-**EM** = **AD** (number of lightning strikes) * ** EF** (kg emission per strike) +<m> EM = AD_(number of lightning strikes) x EF_(kg emission per strike) </m>
-</WRAP>+
  
 ===Activity data === ===Activity data ===
Line 56: Line 55:
  
 __Table 1: Annual number of lightning strikes in Germany, as 1990, in [1,000 strikes]__ __Table 1: Annual number of lightning strikes in Germany, as 1990, in [1,000 strikes]__
-^ 1990  ^ 1995  ^  2000   ^  2005  ^  2010  ^  2011  ^  2012  ^  2013  ^  2014  ^  2015  ^  2016  ^  2017  ^  2018  ^  2019  ^  2020  ^  2021  ^  2022  ^  2023  ^ +^ 1990  ^ 1995  ^  2000   ^  2005  ^  2010  ^  2015  ^  2016  ^  2017  ^  2018  ^  2019  ^  2020  ^  2021  ^  2022  ^  2023  ^  2024  ^ 
-|  443  |  394  |  1,026  |  802   |  589   |  687   |  656   |  542   |  623   |  550   |  432   |  443   |  446   |  329   |  399   |  512   |  242   |  316   |+|  443  |  394  |  1,026  |  802   |  589   |  550   |  432   |  443   |  446   |  329   |  399   |  512   |  242   |  316   |  210   |
  
 ===Emission factor(s)=== ===Emission factor(s)===
Line 69: Line 68:
 Figure 1: NFR 11.C, NO<sub>x</sub> emissions from lightning Figure 1: NFR 11.C, NO<sub>x</sub> emissions from lightning
  
-{{ :sector:natural_sources:11c_nox_from_lightning.png?nolink&600 |}}+{{ :sector:natural_sources:11c_nox_from_lightning.png?nolink&800 | Annual nitrogen oxides emissions from lightning over Germany.}}
  
 ===== Recalculations ===== ===== Recalculations =====
Line 80: Line 79:
 The AD from BLIDS does have a low uncertainty of ± 3%. The uncertainties for the emission factors are estimated to be relatively high, being a default value. Hence the overall uncertainty for the emission estimation of NO<sub>x</sub> from lightning is qualified estimated by expert judgement to be high (>50%). The AD from BLIDS does have a low uncertainty of ± 3%. The uncertainties for the emission factors are estimated to be relatively high, being a default value. Hence the overall uncertainty for the emission estimation of NO<sub>x</sub> from lightning is qualified estimated by expert judgement to be high (>50%).
  
-====Quality checks==== 
- 
-No sector-specific quality checks are done. 
  
 ====Planned Improvement==== ====Planned Improvement====