meta data for this page
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| sector:other_and_natural_sources:natural_sources:other [2025/04/16 09:11] – [Table] kotzulla | sector:other_and_natural_sources:natural_sources:other [2026/02/17 11:02] (current) – [Table] hausmann | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
| __Table 1: Annual number of lightning strikes in Germany, as 1990, in [1,000 strikes]__ | __Table 1: Annual number of lightning strikes in Germany, as 1990, in [1,000 strikes]__ | ||
| - | ^ 1990 ^ 1995 ^ 2000 | + | ^ 1990 ^ 1995 ^ 2000 |
| - | | 443 | 394 | 1,026 | 802 | + | | 443 | 394 | 1,026 | 802 |
| ===Emission factor(s)=== | ===Emission factor(s)=== | ||
| Line 69: | Line 69: | ||
| Figure 1: NFR 11.C, NO< | Figure 1: NFR 11.C, NO< | ||
| - | {{ : | + | {{ : |
| ===== Recalculations ===== | ===== Recalculations ===== | ||
| Line 80: | Line 80: | ||
| The AD from BLIDS does have a low uncertainty of ± 3%. The uncertainties for the emission factors are estimated to be relatively high, being a default value. Hence the overall uncertainty for the emission estimation of NO< | The AD from BLIDS does have a low uncertainty of ± 3%. The uncertainties for the emission factors are estimated to be relatively high, being a default value. Hence the overall uncertainty for the emission estimation of NO< | ||
| - | ====Quality checks==== | ||
| - | |||
| - | No sector-specific quality checks are done. | ||
| ====Planned Improvement==== | ====Planned Improvement==== | ||