meta data for this page
  •  

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
sector:waste:biological_treatment_solid_waste_disposal:start [2025/10/20 11:00] – [Activity data] schillersector:waste:biological_treatment_solid_waste_disposal:start [2026/03/16 14:19] (current) – [Table] mielke
Line 9: Line 9:
 ---- ----
  
-|  NO<sub>x</sub>                         ^  NMVOC  |  SO<sub>2</sub>  |  NH<sub>3</sub>  ^  PM<sub>2.5</sub>  ^  PM<sub>10</sub>  ^  TSP  ^  BC   |  CO  |  Heavy Metals  |  POPs  | +|  NO<sub>x</sub>                         ^  NMVOC  |  SO<sub>2</sub>  |  NH<sub>3</sub>  ^  PM<sub>2.5</sub>  ^  PM<sub>10</sub>  ^  TSP  ^  BC  |  CO  |  Pb  |  Cd  |  Hg  |  As  |  Cr  |  Cu  |  Ni  |  Se  |  Zn  |  PCDD/F  |  B(a)P  |  B(b)F  |  B(k)F  |  I(x)P  |  PAHs  |  HCB  |  PCB  | 
-|  NA                                     |  -/-    |  NA              |  NA              |  -/-               |  -/-              |  -/-  |  -/-  |  NA  |  NA            |  NA    | +|  NA                                     |  -/-    |  NA              |  NA              |  -/-               |  -/-              |  -/-  |  NA  |  NA  |  NA  |  NA  |  NA  |  NA  |  NA  |  NA  |  NA  |  NA  |  NA  |  NA      |  NA     |  NA     |  NA     |  NA     |  NA    |  NA   |  NA   | 
-|  {{page>general:Misc:Legendkca:start}}                                                                                                                                  |||||||||||+|  {{page>general:Misc:Legendkca:start}}                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
  
 In category **5.A**, __NMVOC and PM<sub>2.5</sub>__ emissions from managed disposal in landfills are reported in accordance with review recommendation DE-5A-2017-0001. In addition to that, for the sake of completeness, __PM<sub>10</sub> and TSP__ emissions were also reported. In category **5.A**, __NMVOC and PM<sub>2.5</sub>__ emissions from managed disposal in landfills are reported in accordance with review recommendation DE-5A-2017-0001. In addition to that, for the sake of completeness, __PM<sub>10</sub> and TSP__ emissions were also reported.
Line 24: Line 24:
 ===== Methodology ===== ===== Methodology =====
  
-For the estimation of NMVOC, Germany decided against the proposed EF of the EMEP/EEA Guidebook 2019, but instead for the Tier1 approach of the US-EPA which is also reproduced there (Part B, 5.A, chap. 3.2.2, p. 5) [(EMEPEEA2019)]. +For the estimation of NMVOC, Germany decided against the proposed EF of the EMEP/EEA Guidebook 2023, but instead for the Tier1 approach of the US-EPA which is reproduced in the EMEP/EEA Guidebook 2019 (Part B, 5.A, chap. 3.2.2, p. 5) [(EMEPEEA2019)]. 
  
 According to national experts in the field, the approach of the US-EPA is more likely to produce better data, because the ratio between NMVOC (1.3 %) and CH<sub>4</sub> (98.7 %) in VOC from landfill gas is scientifically sound and assumed to be the very same in Germany. Also, already existing and published data for methane emissions from landfills, derived from the IPCC-FOD Waste Model (see NIR of Germany), can be used. However, with the NIR 2023 some of the emission parameters used to estimate methane emissions have been modified (DOC for food waste, DOC<sub>f</sub> for wood/straw, half-life time for paper and wood/straw) according to the results of research projects initiated for the improvement of the German inventory reporting (Stegmann et al, 2018; pages 172-173, table 36) [(STEGMANN2018)]. As a result, the methane emissions have changed considerably and thus the related NMVOC-emissions that are reported here. According to national experts in the field, the approach of the US-EPA is more likely to produce better data, because the ratio between NMVOC (1.3 %) and CH<sub>4</sub> (98.7 %) in VOC from landfill gas is scientifically sound and assumed to be the very same in Germany. Also, already existing and published data for methane emissions from landfills, derived from the IPCC-FOD Waste Model (see NIR of Germany), can be used. However, with the NIR 2023 some of the emission parameters used to estimate methane emissions have been modified (DOC for food waste, DOC<sub>f</sub> for wood/straw, half-life time for paper and wood/straw) according to the results of research projects initiated for the improvement of the German inventory reporting (Stegmann et al, 2018; pages 172-173, table 36) [(STEGMANN2018)]. As a result, the methane emissions have changed considerably and thus the related NMVOC-emissions that are reported here.
  
-Emissions for PM<sub>2.5</sub>, PM<sub>10</sub> and TSP, reported under this category, are calculated using the Tier1 approach of the EMEP/EEA Guidebook 2019, where the emission factors are 0.033, 0.219 and 0.463 [g/t] [(EMEPEEA2019)].+Emissions for PM<sub>2.5</sub>, PM<sub>10</sub> and TSP, reported under this category, are calculated using the Tier1 approach of the EMEP/EEA Guidebook 2023, where the emission factors are 0.033, 0.219 and 0.463 [g/t] [(EMEPEEA2023)].
  
 The EFs are multiplied with the total amount of solid waste (AD) treated in managed above-ground landfills, following the standard equation: The EFs are multiplied with the total amount of solid waste (AD) treated in managed above-ground landfills, following the standard equation:
Line 49: Line 49:
 ===== Uncertainties ===== ===== Uncertainties =====
  
-The AD from Statistisches Bundesamt usually have an uncertainty of ±3% whereas the uncertainties for the PMs and TSP emission factors, according to the EMEP/EEA Guidebook (Part B, 5.A, chap. 3.2.2, Table 3-1, p. 5), were estimated as:+The AD from Statistisches Bundesamt usually have an uncertainty of ±3% whereas the uncertainties for the PMs and TSP emission factors, according to the EMEP/EEA Guidebook (Part B, 5.A, chap. 3.2.2, Table 3-1, p. 6), were estimated as:
  
 __Table 1: Uncertainty estimates of PM emission factors__ __Table 1: Uncertainty estimates of PM emission factors__
Line 60: Line 60:
 ===== Recalculations ===== ===== Recalculations =====
  
-Regular back-calculations are required annually for the previous year, since the waste statistics of the Federal Statistical Office are published with a one-year delay for the data on the quantities and compositions of waste deposited, so that the current reporting year must therefore be estimated. The estimate is replaced in the following year with the then current data. Since the recalculation required as a result is overall very small in each year, it usually is not reported additionally here.+The waste statistics of the Federal Statistical Office are regularly published with a one-year delay - which leads to an estimation of the current reporting year. This estimate is replaced in the following year with the then current data. Since the resulting recalculation usually is very small it is not reported here.
  
-However, in this year's reporting the need for correction of NMVOC-emissions arises and thus will be reported. Reason for this is that National Statistics have published the recovered gas volumes from the storage and decommissioning phase for 2022, leading to a change of estimated methane emissions under UNFCCC for 2021 + 2022. Due to the fact that the method for the estimation of NMVOC emissions is directly linked to the CH4 amounts estimated by using the IPCCs FOD-Model, the NMVOC-emissions are also affected and recalculated as shown in the following table. In the same course a recalculation of PM and TSP for 2022 is reported additionally (see last table).\\+However, in this year's reporting the correction of the deposited waste quantities is higher than usual and thus is affecting the recalculation of TSP an PMs to a higher extend than is usually the case. For this reason, the recalculation is reported here. For the sake of completeness NMVOC emissions are also reported.\\
  
-__Table 1: Revised NMVOC-emissions [kt]__ +__Table 1: Revised 2023 NMVOC emissions, in [kt]__ 
-|                      ^  2021  ^  2022  ^  +^ current submission   |  1,037            |   
-^ current submission   |  1,263            |  1,144           | +^ previous submission  |  1,056            |  
-^ previous submission  |  1,211            |  1,117           |+\\ 
  
-__Table 2: Revised 2022 PM and TSP emissions, in [t]__ +__Table 2: Revised 2023 PM and TSP emissions, in [t]__ 
-|                      ^  TSP  ^  PM<sub>10</sub>  ^  PM<sub>2.5</sub>      ^ +|                      ^  TSP     ^  PM<sub>10</sub>  ^  PM<sub>2.5</sub>  ^ 
-^ current submission   |  18,1347            |  8,5777           |  1,2925  | +^ current submission   |  15,621  |  7,389            |  1,113             | 
-^ previous submission  |  18,3484            |  8,6788           |  1,3078  |+^ previous submission  |  18,135  |  8,578            |  1,293             |
  
  
  
 <WRAP center round info 60%> <WRAP center round info 60%>
-For **pollutant-specific information on recalculated emission estimates for Base Year and 2022**, please see the recalculation tables following [[general:recalculations:start|chapter 9.1 - Recalculations]].+For **pollutant-specific information on recalculated emission estimates for Base Year and 2023**, please see the recalculation tables following [[general:recalculations:start|chapter 9.1 - Recalculations]].
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
  
Line 88: Line 88:
  
  
-[(DESTATIS2024> Destatis (2024): Federal Statistical Office (Statistisches Bundesamt - Destatis), Fachserie 19, Reihe 1: Abfallentsorgung (Waste management), Table 2.1; https://www.destatis.de/DE/Publikationen/Thematisch/UmweltstatistischeErhebungen/Abfallwirtschaft/Abfallentsorgung.html, Wiesbaden, 2024.)]+[(DESTATIS2024> Destatis (2024): Federal Statistical Office (Statistisches Bundesamt - Destatis), Fachserie 19, Reihe 1: Abfallentsorgung (Waste management), Table 2.1; Wiesbaden 2024. https://www.destatis.de/DE/Publikationen/Thematisch/UmweltstatistischeErhebungen/Abfallwirtschaft/Abfallentsorgung.html)]
  
-[(EMEPEEA2019> EMEP/EEA (2019): EMEP/EEA air pollutant emission inventory guidebook 2019, Part B, 5.A, chapter 3.2.2, Table 3-1, page 5; https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/analysis/publications/emep-eea-guidebook-2019/part-b-sectoral-guidance-chapters/5-waste/5-a-biological-treatment-of/@@download/file; Copenhagen, 2019. )] +[(EMEPEEA2023> EMEP/EEA (2023): EMEP/EEA air pollutant emission inventory guidebook 2023, Part B, 5.A, chapter 3.2.2, Table 3-1, page 6; Copenhagen 2023.  
-[(STEGMANN2018> Stegmann et al. (2018): Stegmann, R., Heyer, K.-U., Hupe, K. (IFAS - Ingenieurbüro für Abfallwirtschaft, Hamburg) with Rettenberger, G., Schneider, R. ( +https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/analysis/publications/emep-eea-guidebook-2023/part-b-sectoral-guidance-chapters/5-waste/5-a-solid-waste-disposal/@@download/file)] 
-Ingenieurgruppe RUK GmbH, Stuttgar): Überprüfung der methodischen Grundlagen zur Bestimmung der Methanbildung in Deponien, ISSN 1862-4804; https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/sites/default/files/medien/11850/publikationen/139_2023_texte_methanbildung_in_deponien.pdf, on behalf of the Umweltbundesamt, Dessau-Roßlau, 2018.)]+[(EMEPEEA2019> EMEP/EEA (2019): EMEP/EEA air pollutant emission inventory guidebook 2019, Part B, 5.A, chapter 3.2.2, Table 3-1, page 5; Copenhagen 2019. https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/analysis/publications/emep-eea-guidebook-2019/part-b-sectoral-guidance-chapters/5-waste/5-a-biological-treatment-of/@@download/file)] 
 +[(STEGMANN2018> Stegmann et al. (2018): Stegmann, R., Heyer, K.-U., Hupe, K. (IFAS - Ingenieurbüro für Abfallwirtschaft, Hamburg) with Rettenberger, G., Schneider, R. (Ingenieurgruppe RUK GmbH, Stuttgart): Überprüfung der methodischen Grundlagen zur Bestimmung der Methanbildung in Deponien, ISSN 1862-4804; on behalf of the Umweltbundesamt, Dessau-Roßlau 2018. https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/sites/default/files/medien/11850/publikationen/139_2023_texte_methanbildung_in_deponien.pdf)]