meta data for this page
  •  

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
sector:waste:cremation:start [2026/03/26 09:58] – [Emission factors] kludtsector:waste:cremation:start [2026/04/01 13:27] (current) – [Activity data] kotzulla
Line 22: Line 22:
 ^  1990   ^  1995   ^  2000   ^  2005   ^  2010   ^  2015   ^  2020   ^  2024   ^ ^  1990   ^  1995   ^  2000   ^  2005   ^  2010   ^  2015   ^  2020   ^  2024   ^
 |  13.55  |  25.32  |  26.24  |  29.22  |  34.18  |  45.88  |  56.77  |  60.97  | |  13.55  |  25.32  |  26.24  |  29.22  |  34.18  |  45.88  |  56.77  |  60.97  |
-Source: own calculation, conversion is not described in more detail here for reasons of piety, but is done in a manner comparable to other publications.+| data source: own calculation, conversion is not described in detail here for reasons of piety, but is comparable to other publications ||||||||
 ====Emission factors==== ====Emission factors====
  
 Emission factors used are default values from the EMEP/EEA air pollutant emission inventory guidebook 2023 as well as national data for POPs from the research project "POP- und Hg-Emissionen aus abfallwirtschaftlichen Anlagen" - Teilvorhaben zum Globalvorhaben „Überprüfung des Standes der Technik der Emissionen prioritärer Schadstoffe für einzelne Industriebranchen (Kleinfeuerungsanlagen und abfallwirtschaftliche Anlagen)“ [(STOECKLEIN2016)] . Emission factors used are default values from the EMEP/EEA air pollutant emission inventory guidebook 2023 as well as national data for POPs from the research project "POP- und Hg-Emissionen aus abfallwirtschaftlichen Anlagen" - Teilvorhaben zum Globalvorhaben „Überprüfung des Standes der Technik der Emissionen prioritärer Schadstoffe für einzelne Industriebranchen (Kleinfeuerungsanlagen und abfallwirtschaftliche Anlagen)“ [(STOECKLEIN2016)] .
  
-In 2018, the TERT noted that the German emission factor for Hg is 100 times smaller than the default value proposed in the 2016 EMEP/EEA Guidebook and the emission factors for Cd and Pb being 1,000 times smaller than the proposed default values.  +In 2018, the TERT noted that the German emission factor for Hg is 100 times smaller than the default value proposed in the 2016 EMEP/EEA Guidebook and the emission factors for Cd and Pb being 1,000 times smaller than the proposed default values. The EF set has now been updated. 
-However, the EFs for Pb and Cd are based on national expert judgement assuming that a) the emissions behave similarly to dust and b) the dust limit value of the air pollution control specification (27th BImSchV) is complied with (to be confirmed on the basis of the new measurement data from 5 crematoria with different exhaust-gas cleaning systems). +
 In contrast, the country-specific emission factor for Hg was calculated on the basis of the German report on “OSPAR Recommendation 2003/4 on controlling the dispersal of mercury from crematoria" - and was revised after the finalization of the research project „Umweltrelevanz und Stand der Technik bei Einäscherungsanlagen“ (Environmental relevance and state of the art for cremation plants) [(SCHETTERBITTIG2020)]. As part of this research project, emission measurements were carried out at six cremation routes. According to OSPAR reporting 2010/2014, approx. 90% of the plants have effective Hg mitigation technology, whereas approx. 10% are not equipped. This ratio is roughly reflected in the 2020 project report, too. In contrast, the country-specific emission factor for Hg was calculated on the basis of the German report on “OSPAR Recommendation 2003/4 on controlling the dispersal of mercury from crematoria" - and was revised after the finalization of the research project „Umweltrelevanz und Stand der Technik bei Einäscherungsanlagen“ (Environmental relevance and state of the art for cremation plants) [(SCHETTERBITTIG2020)]. As part of this research project, emission measurements were carried out at six cremation routes. According to OSPAR reporting 2010/2014, approx. 90% of the plants have effective Hg mitigation technology, whereas approx. 10% are not equipped. This ratio is roughly reflected in the 2020 project report, too.
 Since the cremation duration is approximately one hour, the mean value per hour corresponds to the Hg load per cremation and is used accordingly for inventory calculation.  Since the cremation duration is approximately one hour, the mean value per hour corresponds to the Hg load per cremation and is used accordingly for inventory calculation. 
Line 45: Line 45:
 [{{:sector:waste:em_5c_crem_since_1990.png|**Emission trends in NFR 5.C.1.b.v**}}] [{{:sector:waste:em_5c_crem_since_1990.png|**Emission trends in NFR 5.C.1.b.v**}}]
  
-note: small changes for 2023 
 ===== Recalculations ===== ===== Recalculations =====
  
-<WRAP center round info 60%> +In addition to a number of marginal changes in the time series for several pollutants, there were significant changes in Pb and Cd. The increase over time is due to the replacement of decreasing EF with constant default values. 
-With **activity data and emission factors remaining unrevised**, no recalculations were carried out compared to the previous submission.+ 
 +[{{:sector:waste:recalculation_5c1.png|**Recalculations for Cremation**}}] 
 + 
 +<WRAP center round info 65%> 
 +For **pollutant-specific information on recalculated emission estimates for Base Year and 2023**, please see the recalculation tables following [[general:recalculations:start|chapter 9.1 - Recalculations]].
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
 +
  
 ===== Planned improvements ===== ===== Planned improvements =====