meta data for this page
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| sector:waste:open_burning:start [2026/03/11 11:09] – kotzulla | sector:waste:open_burning:start [2026/03/16 13:58] (current) – [Table] mielke | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| ---- | ---- | ||
| - | ^ NO< | + | ^ NO< |
| - | | -/- | -/- | -/- | + | | -/- | -/- | -/- |
| - | | {{page> | + | | {{page> |
| Within NFR sub-category 5.C.2 - Open Burning of Waste, the German emissions inventory provides only emissions from allowed bonfires and from other wooden materials burnt outdoors. Emissions from bonfires are key source for PM< | Within NFR sub-category 5.C.2 - Open Burning of Waste, the German emissions inventory provides only emissions from allowed bonfires and from other wooden materials burnt outdoors. Emissions from bonfires are key source for PM< | ||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
| Two types of fires were already classified in the expert project: camp fires in the more private sector and, most importantly, | Two types of fires were already classified in the expert project: camp fires in the more private sector and, most importantly, | ||
| - | Here, Easter fires follow an approach | + | Here, Easter fires follow an approach |
| + | Apart from this general approach, | ||
| + | Furthermore for 2020 and 2021, an additional | ||
| + | For all years as of 2022 no such additional | ||
| The following values are the result of evaluation: | The following values are the result of evaluation: | ||
| Line 40: | Line 43: | ||
| ^ 1990 | ^ 1990 | ||
| | 431, | | 431, | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{ : | ||
| + | |||
| ====Emission factors==== | ====Emission factors==== | ||
| - | As discussed on Review 2020 regarding EF used and referenced: We use different EF from different references suitable for the burning of wooden wastes. We consider both fresh wood (garden and park waste) and dry wood (without coatings etc.). We have tried to find relevant parallels, for example because of the burning of fresh wood with regard to forest fires. | + | As discussed on Review 2020 regarding EF used and referenced: We use different EF from different references suitable for the burning of wooden wastes. We consider both fresh wood (garden and park waste) and dry wood (without coatings etc.). We have tried to find relevant parallels, for example because of the burning of fresh wood with regard to forest fires. |
| + | |||
| + | However, | ||
| + | __Table 2: Emission factors applied for emissions from bonfires__ | ||
| ^ | ^ | ||
| ^ CO | 48.8 | ^ CO | 48.8 | ||
| Line 53: | Line 62: | ||
| ^ PM< | ^ PM< | ||
| ^ PM< | ^ PM< | ||
| - | ^ BC | 1,05 | + | ^ BC | 1,05 |
| ^ PCDD/ | ^ PCDD/ | ||
| ^ PAH | ^ PAH | ||
| Line 66: | Line 75: | ||
| ===== Trends in emissions ===== | ===== Trends in emissions ===== | ||
| - | All trends in emissions | + | With no annual emission factors (no emission reduction measures implemeted or to be expected), emission development |
| + | Accordingly, | ||
| [{{: | [{{: | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| ===== Recalculations ===== | ===== Recalculations ===== | ||