meta data for this page
  •  

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
appendices:appendix2.3-hm-from-mobile-sources [2021/04/14 21:26] – [Railways] kotzullaappendices:appendix2.3-hm-from-mobile-sources [2022/08/09 13:19] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
Line 5: Line 5:
 For heavy-metal exhaust emissions (other then lead from leaded gasoline), tier1 values have been derived from tier1 default values provided in the 2019 EMEP/EEA Guidebook. For heavy-metal exhaust emissions (other then lead from leaded gasoline), tier1 values have been derived from tier1 default values provided in the 2019 EMEP/EEA Guidebook.
  
-__Table 1: Tier1 default emisison factors applied to road vehicles, in [g/TJ]__+__Table 1: Tier1 default emisison factors applied to road vehicles, in g/TJ__
 |                        ^  **Pb**  ^  **Cd**  ^  **Hg**  ^  **As**  ^  **Cr**  ^  **Cu**  ^  **Ni**  ^  **Se**  ^  **Zn**  ^ |                        ^  **Pb**  ^  **Cd**  ^  **Hg**  ^  **As**  ^  **Cr**  ^  **Cu**  ^  **Ni**  ^  **Se**  ^  **Zn**  ^
 ^ Diesel oil             |  0.012   |  0.001   |  0.123   |  0.002   |  0.198   |  0.133   |  0.005   |  0.002   |  0.419   | ^ Diesel oil             |  0.012   |  0.001   |  0.123   |  0.002   |  0.198   |  0.133   |  0.005   |  0.002   |  0.419   |
Line 32: Line 32:
 //(Note: Until submission 2017, the EMEP/EEA default EFs provided for NRMM were used in the German inventory. As these EFs do not differentiate between fuel combustion and lubricant co-incineration, the inventory compiler decided to apply the more specific EFs from road transport to NRMM in 1.A.2.g vii, 1.A.4.a ii, b ii and c ii and 1.A.5.b, too. This country-specific approach has been discussed and accepted at both the 2018 TFEIP meeting and the 2018 NEC review.)// //(Note: Until submission 2017, the EMEP/EEA default EFs provided for NRMM were used in the German inventory. As these EFs do not differentiate between fuel combustion and lubricant co-incineration, the inventory compiler decided to apply the more specific EFs from road transport to NRMM in 1.A.2.g vii, 1.A.4.a ii, b ii and c ii and 1.A.5.b, too. This country-specific approach has been discussed and accepted at both the 2018 TFEIP meeting and the 2018 NEC review.)//
  
-__Table 2: Tier1 default emission factors applied to NRMM, in [g/TJ__+__Table 2: Tier1 default emission factors applied to NRMM, in g/TJ__
 |                                        ^  **Pb**  ^  **Cd**  ^  **Hg**  ^  **As**  ^  **Cr**  ^  **Cu**  ^  **Ni**  ^  **Se**  ^  **Zn**  ^ |                                        ^  **Pb**  ^  **Cd**  ^  **Hg**  ^  **As**  ^  **Cr**  ^  **Cu**  ^  **Ni**  ^  **Se**  ^  **Zn**  ^
 ^ Diesel oil                             |  0.012   |  0.001   |  0.123   |  0.002   |  0.198   |  0.133   |  0.005   |  0.002   |  0.419   | ^ Diesel oil                             |  0.012   |  0.001   |  0.123   |  0.002   |  0.198   |  0.133   |  0.005   |  0.002   |  0.419   |
Line 44: Line 44:
 ===== Railways ===== ===== Railways =====
  
-__Table 3: Tier1 default emission factors applied to railway vehicles, in [g/TJ]__+__Table 3: Tier1 default emission factors applied to railway vehicles, in g/TJ__
 |                        ^  **Pb**            ^  **Cd**            ^  **Hg**            ^  **As**             ^  **Cr**            ^  **Cu**             ^  **Ni**            ^  **Se**            ^  **Zn**             ^ |                        ^  **Pb**            ^  **Cd**            ^  **Hg**            ^  **As**             ^  **Cr**            ^  **Cu**             ^  **Ni**            ^  **Se**            ^  **Zn**             ^
 ^ Diesel oil             |  1.21<sup>2</sup>  |  0.23<sup>1</sup>  |  0.12<sup>1</sup>  |  0.002<sup>2</sup>  |  1.16<sup>2</sup>  |  39.57<sup>2</sup>  |  1.63<sup>2</sup>  |  0.23<sup>2</sup>  |  23.28<sup>2</sup>  | ^ Diesel oil             |  1.21<sup>2</sup>  |  0.23<sup>1</sup>  |  0.12<sup>1</sup>  |  0.002<sup>2</sup>  |  1.16<sup>2</sup>  |  39.57<sup>2</sup>  |  1.63<sup>2</sup>  |  0.23<sup>2</sup>  |  23.28<sup>2</sup>  |
Line 84: Line 84:
  
 The EMEP/EEA GB 2019 does not provide specific defaults for HM emissions from the combustion of jet kerosene and aviation gasoline, stating that for for aviation gasoline these emissions are //not estimated// (NE):  The EMEP/EEA GB 2019 does not provide specific defaults for HM emissions from the combustion of jet kerosene and aviation gasoline, stating that for for aviation gasoline these emissions are //not estimated// (NE): 
- 
-[[gallery size="medium"]] 
-: GB2016(July2017)_EF_NA+NE_Avgas.PNG 
-[[/gallery]] 
  
 Therefore, the inventory compiler decided to apply the tier1 EF from gasoline fuel used in non-road mobile machinery here, too. Therefore, the inventory compiler decided to apply the tier1 EF from gasoline fuel used in non-road mobile machinery here, too.
Line 98: Line 94:
 <sup>1</sup> estimated from average lead content of AvGas 100 LL (see also: 1.A.3.a ii (i) and FAQs) of 0.56 g Pb/liter <sup>1</sup> estimated from average lead content of AvGas 100 LL (see also: 1.A.3.a ii (i) and FAQs) of 0.56 g Pb/liter
  
-[(EMEPEEA2019> EMEP/EEA, 2019: EMEP/EEA air pollutant emission inventory guidebook 2019; Copenhagen, 2019.)]+[(EMEPEEA2019> EMEP/EEA, 2019: EMEP/EEA air pollutant emission inventory guidebook 2019; Chapter 1.A - Combustion; URL: https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/emep-eea-guidebook-2019/part-b-sectoral-guidance-chapters/1-energy/1-a-combustion, Copenhagen, 2019.)]