meta data for this page
  •  

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision
Previous revision
general:projections:recalculations [2021/04/23 08:38] – created braunsgeneral:projections:recalculations [2024/02/12 09:10] (current) brauns
Line 1: Line 1:
-====== Introduction ======+===== Recalculations =====
  
-===== Context =====+Due to recalculations in each underlying emission inventory submission, all calculations of emission reduction potentials in the WM and WAM scenario of the respective projection are regularly updated. Furthermore, additional measures that had been included in the WAM scenario in the projection before can become part of the WM scenario in the following projection, as they were put into force in the meantime (e. g. 44<sup>th</sup> BImSchV). In addition, updated GHG emission projections using most recent projections of economic and other parameters result in a new projection of activity rates that needs to be considered for updating the emission projections of air pollutants. For the draft German NAPCP of 2023, which is the draft of the second German NAPCP under directive (EU) 2016/2284, last step to check was, whether new additional measures are needed for compliance to the emission reduction commitments, because of the updates described above.
  
-Reliable data on historic emissions are key to the political process and to decisions on abatement technology promotionHoweverfuture emission paths also do have the power to shed new light on these discussionsTherefore, greenhouse gases (GHG) and air pollutants are inventoried and projected in the same database system using the same structure of detailed time series.+The following figures show the differences between inventory submissions 2018, 2020 and 2022 for historic emissions as well as the differences between the WAM emission projections reported in 2019 (consistent with the NAPCP 2019), reported in 2021 and reported in 2023 (consistent with the draft NAPCP 2023) for each pollutantIn additionfor the emission projections 2023 the WM scenario is shown up to the year 2040. For each pollutant brief explanation of the most relevant reasons for the occurring differences compared to the previous reporting is givenFor explanation of the differences between reporting in 2021 and 2019 please see the IIR of the 2021 reporting((https://iir.umweltbundesamt.de/2021/general/projections/recalculations)).
  
-For the National Air Pollution Control Programmea new database within this system was created in 2018 that is basically a copy of the German inventory database. In addition, multiple scenarios are taken into account, sketching development of activity data and emission factors up to 2030 and in many cases to 2035The new system features integrated assessment for both greenhouse gases (GHGand air pollutantsIn particularexisting projections for GHG can be applied to air pollution contexts. The databases used also allow for the flexible combination of distinct scenarios for specific sectors and source categories to add up to a complete projection of the inventoryFurthermorereduction potentials of mitigation measures can be modelled in detail and quantified directly in the database. The projection database is fully operational and used as the common basis for reporting on emission projections under NEC directive and CLRTAP reporting obligations+For NO<sub>X</sub>recalculations within the inventory submission 2022 lead to changes in historic years predominantly in sector 2.B.2 (nitric acid production)((https://iir.umweltbundesamt.de/2022/sector/ippu/chemical_industry/nitric_acid_production/start))that were compensating the positive recalculations from inventory submission 2021, when comparing submissions 2022 and 2020. The current WM scenario is slightly below the WAM scenario of the 2021 projection. Main reasons are the updates in road transport emission factors in HBEFA 4.2 (aging factorsetc.) as well as a higher share of electric vehicles in the 2030 fleet. The current WAM scenario goes further below the WAM scenario of the 2021 projection. An accelerated coal phase-out by 2030, introduction of Euro 7 and a higher share of electric vehicles in the fleet in 2030 in the WAM scenario of the draft NAPCP 2023 are the main drivers for additional emission reductions.
  
 +In 2020 a significant drop of mileage, against an increasing long-term trend, especially for passenger cars appeared. In combination with an ongoing decrease in the implied emission factors through regular fleet renewal, an extraordinary decrease in NO<sub>X</sub> emissions was the result. This drop in overall mileage of passenger cars, probably caused by the lockdown period during the pandemic as well as a higher share of home office workers, does not appear to be continuing in the coming years. Therefore, the projection follows the long-term trend of increasing mileage, especially for passenger cars. Projected potential emission reductions in road transport are therefore only caused by a further decrease of implied emission factors of the fleet, by regular fleet renewal, Euro 7 and an increasing share of electric vehicles.
  
-===== Policies =====+{{:general:projections:nox_recalculation_2023.png?|}}
  
-For the past few years, climate change and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions have been an important issue in society and politics. GHG emission inventories have seen a lot of attention as a consequence. Howeverthere have also been a couple of air pollution related headlines, including "diesel gate" and particulate matter concentrations caused by residential wood burning. In Germany, these discussions have led to a number of legislative projects and new regulations which have the power to significantly change emission levels. Thus, projections generally show further decline in emissions, even for ammonia, where not much progress has been achieved during the last decadesThe main policy drivers are listed and contextualized below+For SO<sub>X</sub>, the current WM scenario is slightly above the WAM scenario of the 2021 projectionmainly because of more conservative assumptions regarding decline in SO<sub>X</sub> emissions from the industry sectorDue to the accelerated coal phase-out by 2030 the current WAM scenario is below the former WAM scenarios with a coal phase-out until 2038.
-    * Energy +
-      * Phase-out of coal use for energy production until 2038 with significant reductions before 2030 +
-      * Recent high Emission Tradring System (ETS) prices and low natural gas prices cause a shift in the energy market, abandoning coal even faster +
-      * Increased production of renewable energy +
-      * New regulations with stricter limit values for some installation types+
  
-    * Transport +{{:general:projections:sox_recalculation_2023.png?|}}
-      * New vehicle regulations, including updated Euro norms +
-      * More electric vehicles, more public transport+
  
-    * Agriculture +NMVOC emission projections are strongly influenced by economic projections. Updates on these are therefore causing changes in NMVOC emission projections. However, the latest historic emissions in 2020 are already below the current projections for 2025 to 2040 in the draft NAPCP 2023, which is caused by decreases over all sectors.
-      * New "Düngeverordnung" (fertiliser ordinance) as well as other legislative and incentive measures to reduce fertiliser use and lower animal numbers+
  
 +{{:general:projections:nmvoc_recalculation_2023.png?|}}
 +
 +Submission 2021 contained recalculations of NH<sub>3</sub> emissions in historic years mainly because of introducing dairy heifers (dairy and slaughter heifers are now treated separately in the inventory) and a methodological change in emission calculations for inorganic fertilisers, leading to significantly lower emissions and less variation from one year to another((for further explanation see: https://iir.umweltbundesamt.de/2021/general/recalculations/ammonia)). This is the main reason that emission projections of the draft NAPCP 2023 are systematically lower than former projections. As a result, absolute emissions to be reached in 2020 and 2030 following the relative reduction commitments are lower than before. Despite a similar trend in the current emission projections compared to 2021 WAM projection, assumptions of reduction potentials of WM and WAM measures are more conservative now, but compensated by assuming further decreases in animal numbers, especially cattle. This is further explained in the draft NAPCP 2023.
 +
 +{{:general:projections:nh3_recalculation_2023.png?|}}
 +
 +Differences in current projections of fine PM emissions (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) are a consequence of many factors.
 +
 +First, recalculations took place in submission 2021 in sector 2.G in the use of fireworks and the use of tobacco((see https://iir.umweltbundesamt.de/2021/general/recalculations/pm2.5)) and in submission 2022 in 1.A.3.d. ii (national navigation)((see https://iir.umweltbundesamt.de/2022/sector/energy/fuel_combustion/transport/navigation/national_navigation)) leading to lower PM<sub>2.5</sub> emissions over all historic years compared to submission 2020. The change in 2005 results in lower absolute emissions to be reached in 2020 and 2030 regarding the relative emission reduction commitments compared to the 2021 projections and further in systematically lower projections based on submission 2022 compared to 2021 projections. Still, the WM scenario of the draft NAPCP 2023 is above the WAM scenario of the NAPCP 2019 because of the same reason as in 2021 projection (more conservative methodology to project activity rates in certain industrial sectors)((for further explanation see https://iir.umweltbundesamt.de/2021/general/projections/recalculations)). Finally, the current WAM scenario is compliant with the emission reduction commitment in 2030 due to additional emission reductions through the accelerated coal phase-out by 2030 and the road transport package. Increasing emissions in the building sector due to a projected increase in biomass use can be compensated by additional measures to further reduce the implied emission factors of small combustion installations burning woody biomass. However, if looking at the year 2020 of submission 2022 current WM and WAM scenario are quite conservative due to conservative assumptions over almost all sectors.
 +
 +{{:general:projections:pm2.5_recalculation_2023.png?|}}