meta data for this page
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
sector:agriculture:manure_management:start [2022/12/14 15:12] – doering | sector:agriculture:manure_management:start [2022/12/15 12:00] – [Method] doering | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 149: | Line 149: | ||
== Anaerobic digestion of manure == | == Anaerobic digestion of manure == | ||
- | According to IPCC (2006), anaerobic digestion of manure is treated like a particular storage type that, however, comprises three sub-compartments (pre-storage, | + | According to IPCC (2006), anaerobic digestion of manure is treated like a particular storage type that, however, comprises three sub-compartments (pre-storage, |
NH< | NH< | ||
Line 157: | Line 157: | ||
The detailed NH< | The detailed NH< | ||
- | For the detailed emission factors of livestock husbandry see Vos et al. (2022), Chapters 4 to 8; for emission factors of digested manure see Vos et al. (2022), Chapter | + | For the detailed emission factors of livestock husbandry see Rösemann |
- | The detailed emission factors for N< | + | Table 3 provides, by animal category, the implied NH< |
+ | |||
+ | The the detailed emission factors for N< | ||
Table 3 shows the implied emission factors of NH< | Table 3 shows the implied emission factors of NH< | ||
//Table 3: IEF for NH< | //Table 3: IEF for NH< | ||
- | | ^ 1990 ^ 1995 ^ 2000 ^ 2005 ^ 2010 ^ 2011 ^ 2012 ^ 2013 ^ 2014 ^ 2015 ^ 2016 ^ 2017 ^ 2018 ^ 2019 ^ 2020 ^ | + | | ^ 1990 ^ 1995 ^ 2000 ^ 2005 ^ 2010 ^ 2011 ^ 2012 ^ 2013 ^ 2014 ^ 2015 ^ 2016 ^ 2017 ^ 2018 ^ 2019 ^ 2020 |
- | ^ IEF in kg NH₃ per animal place |||||||||||||||| | + | ^ IEF in kg NH₃ per animal place ||||||||||||||||| |
- | ^ dairy cattle | + | ^ dairy cattle |
- | ^ other cattle | + | ^ other cattle |
- | ^ horses | + | ^ horses |
- | ^ sheep | 0.83 | 0.82 | 0.84 | 0.83 | 0.84 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.82 | 0.83 | 0.83 | | + | ^ sheep | 0.83 | 0.82 | 0.84 | 0.83 | 0.84 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.82 | 0.83 | |
- | ^ goats | 1.62 | 1.62 | 1.62 | 1.62 | 1.62 | 1.62 | 1.62 | 1.62 | 1.62 | 1.62 | 1.62 | 1.62 | 1.62 | 1.62 | 1.62 | | + | ^ goats |
- | ^ swine | 4.60 | 4.50 | 4.37 | 4.30 | 4.13 | 4.07 | 4.03 | 4.00 | 3.98 | 4.02 | 4.00 | 3.98 | 3.97 | 3.94 | 3.92 | | + | ^ swine | 4.53 | 4.45 | 4.33 | 4.25 | 4.08 | 4.01 | 3.94 | 3.89 | 3.84 | 3.86 | 3.81 | 3.77 | 3.73 | 3.67 | |
- | ^ laying hens | 0.212 | 0.203 | 0.199 | 0.198 | 0.142 | 0.144 | 0.144 | 0.145 | 0.146 | 0.146 | 0.147 | 0.147 | 0.148 | 0.149 | 0.150 | | + | ^ laying hens | 0.214 | 0.206 | 0.211 | 0.209 | 0.137 | 0.138 | 0.136 | 0.135 | 0.133 | 0.132 | 0.130 | 0.129 | 0.128 | 0.126 | 0.125 | 0.125 | |
- | ^ broilers | + | ^ broilers |
- | ^ turkeys | + | ^ turkeys |
- | ^ pullets | + | ^ pullets |
- | ^ ducks | 0.193 | 0.193 | 0.193 | 0.192 | 0.189 | 0.188 | 0.188 | 0.186 | 0.186 | 0.185 | 0.185 | 0.186 | 0.186 | 0.186 | 0.186 | | + | ^ ducks | 0.193 | 0.193 | 0.193 | 0.192 | 0.189 | 0.188 | 0.188 | 0.186 | 0.186 | 0.185 | 0.185 | 0.185 | 0.186 | 0.186 | 0.185 | 0.185 | |
- | ^ geese | 0.384 | 0.384 | 0.384 | 0.383 | 0.380 | 0.380 | 0.380 | 0.379 | 0.379 | 0.378 | 0.378 | 0.378 | 0.378 | 0.378 | 0.378 | | + | ^ geese | 0.384 | 0.384 | 0.384 | 0.383 | 0.380 | 0.380 | 0.380 | 0.379 | 0.379 | 0.378 | 0.378 | 0.378 | 0.378 | 0.378 | 0.378 | 0.378 | |
- | ^ IEF in kg NOₓ per animal place |||||||||||||||| | + | ^ IEF in kg NOₓ per animal place ||||||||||||||||| |
- | ^ dairy cattle | + | ^ dairy cattle |
- | ^ other cattle | + | ^ other cattle |
- | ^ horses | + | ^ horses |
- | ^ sheep | 0.006 | 0.006 | 0.006 | 0.006 | 0.006 | 0.006 | 0.006 | 0.006 | 0.006 | 0.006 | 0.006 | 0.006 | 0.006 | 0.006 | 0.006 | | + | ^ sheep |
- | ^ goats | 0.013 | 0.013 | 0.013 | 0.013 | 0.013 | 0.013 | 0.013 | 0.013 | 0.013 | 0.013 | 0.013 | 0.013 | 0.013 | 0.013 | 0.013 | | + | ^ goats |
- | ^ swine | 0.011 | 0.013 | 0.012 | 0.014 | 0.014 | 0.014 | 0.013 | 0.013 | 0.013 | 0.013 | 0.013 | 0.013 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.012 | | + | ^ swine | 0.011 | 0.013 | 0.012 | 0.014 | 0.014 | 0.014 | 0.013 | 0.013 | 0.013 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.011 | 0.011 | 0.011 | |
- | ^ laying hens | 0.00027 | 0.00026 | 0.00026 | 0.00029 | 0.00035 | 0.00035 | 0.00034 | 0.00034 | 0.00034 | 0.00034 | 0.00034 | 0.00034 | 0.00034 | 0.00034 | 0.00034 | | + | ^ laying hens | 0.00027 | 0.00026 | 0.00025 | 0.00029 | 0.00035 | 0.00035 | 0.00033 | 0.00033 | 0.00033 | 0.00033 | 0.00033 | 0.00033 | 0.00033 | 0.00033 | 0.00033 | 0.00033 |
- | ^ broilers | + | ^ broilers |
- | ^ turkeys | + | ^ turkeys |
- | ^ pullets | + | ^ pullets |
- | ^ ducks | 0.00024 | 0.00024 | 0.00024 | 0.00025 | 0.00027 | 0.00027 | 0.00026 | 0.00027 | 0.00027 | 0.00027 | 0.00027 | 0.00027 | 0.00027 | 0.00026 | 0.00026 | | + | ^ ducks | 0.00024 | 0.00024 | 0.00024 | 0.00025 | 0.00027 | 0.00027 | 0.00026 | 0.00027 | 0.00027 | 0.00027 | 0.00027 | 0.00027 | 0.00027 |
- | ^ geese | 0.00024 | 0.00024 | 0.00025 | 0.00027 | 0.00030 | 0.00030 | 0.00028 | 0.00029 | 0.00028 | 0.00029 | 0.00029 | 0.00029 | 0.00028 | 0.00028 | 0.00028 | | + | ^ geese | 0.00024 | 0.00024 | 0.00025 | 0.00027 | 0.00030 | 0.00030 | 0.00028 | 0.00029 | 0.00028 | 0.00029 | 0.00029 | 0.00029 |
== Trend discussion for Key Sources == | == Trend discussion for Key Sources == | ||
- | Dairy cattle, other cattle and swine are key sources of NH< | + | Dairy cattle, other cattle and swine are key sources of NH< |
+ | |||
For NO< | For NO< | ||
== Recalculations == | == Recalculations == | ||
- | All time series of the emission inventory have completely been recalculated since 1990. Tables REC-1 and REC-2 compare the recalculated time series for NH< | + | All time series of the emission inventory have completely been recalculated since 1990. Tables REC-1 and REC-2 compare the recalculated time series for NH< |
- | The total emissions of NH< | + | |
- | ([[sector: | + | |
+ | The NH< | ||
+ | ([[sector: | ||
- | The overall NH< | + | Further details on recalculations are described in Rösemann |
- | //Tables REC-1 and REC-2: Comparison of the NH< | + | //Tables REC-1 and REC-2: Comparison of the NH< |
- | ^ NH₃ emissions from manure management, in Gg | + | ^ NH₃ emissions from manure management, in Gg |||||||||||||||||| |
- | | | + | | |
- | ^ Total | + | ^ Total ^ 2023 | 296.08 | 244.15 | 242.78 | 243.08 | 238.82 | 238.18 | 241.00 | 240.92 | 240.96 | 237.93 | 234.15 | 232.03 | 225.13 | 220.63 | 216.65 | 208.39 | |
- | ^ | + | ^ ^ 2022 | 307.85 | 257.56 | 256.39 | 256.42 | 251.11 | 252.27 | 257.23 | 259.54 | 262.08 | 261.24 | 259.61 | 259.48 | 254.22 | 251.43 | 249.17 |
- | ^ Dairy cattle | + | ^ Dairy cattle |
- | ^ | + | ^ |
- | ^ Other cattle | + | ^ Other cattle |
- | ^ | + | ^ |
- | ^ Swine ^ 2022 | 121.81 | 91.84 | 95.23 | 97.70 | 91.92 | 92.81 | 95.19 | 93.59 | 94.09 | 92.36 | 91.07 | 91.20 | 87.44 | 85.01 | 84.75 | | + | ^ Swine ^ |
- | ^ | + | ^ |
- | ^ poultry | + | ^ poultry |
- | ^ | + | ^ |
- | ^ Other animals | + | ^ Other animals |
- | ^ | + | ^ |
- | ^ NOₓ emissions from manure management, in Gg ||||||||||||||||| | + | ^ NOₓ emissions from manure management, in Gg |||||||||||||||||| |
- | ^ | + | ^ |
- | ^ Total | + | ^ Total |
- | ^ | + | ^ |
- | ^ Dairy cattle | + | ^ Dairy cattle |
- | ^ | + | ^ |
- | ^ Other cattle | + | ^ Other cattle |
- | ^ | + | ^ |
- | ^ Swine | + | ^ Swine |
- | ^ | + | ^ |
- | ^ poultry | + | ^ poultry |
- | ^ | + | ^ |
- | ^ Other animals | + | ^ Other animals |
- | ^ | + | ^ |
Line 242: | Line 249: | ||
===== NMVOC ===== | ===== NMVOC ===== | ||
- | In 2020, NMVOC emissions from manure management amount to 289.8 which is 96.9 % of total NMVOC emissions from the agricultural sector. 84.7 % originate from cattle, 4.8 % from pigs, and 9.4 % from poultry. | + | In 2021, NMVOC emissions from manure management amount to 281.2 kt which is 96.8 % of total NMVOC emissions from the agricultural sector. 84.6 % originate from cattle, 4.5 % from pigs, and 9.7 % from poultry. |
==== Method ==== | ==== Method ==== | ||
- | The Tier 2 methodology provided by EMEP (2019)-3B-28 was used to assess the NMVOC emissions from manure management for dairy cattle and other cattle. For all other animals the Tier 1 methodology (EMEP (2019)-3B-17) was used. | + | The Tier 2 methodology provided by EMEP (2019)-3B-28 was used to assess the NMVOC emissions from manure management for dairy cattle and other cattle. For all other animals the Tier 1 methodology (EMEP (2019)-3B-17) was used. The use of the Tier 2 methodology deliversyields NMVOC emissions which formally could be reported in the sectors 3.D.a.2.a (application of manure to soils) and 3.D.a.3 (grazing emissions). However, to be congruent with the NMVOC emissions for other animal categories, Germany reports these emissions in the NMVOC emissions reported from manure management (3.B). For the NFR codes 3.D.a.2.a |
=== Activity data === | === Activity data === | ||
Line 252: | Line 259: | ||
=== Emission factors === | === Emission factors === | ||
For the Tier 2 methodology applied to dairy cattle and other cattle the following data was used: | For the Tier 2 methodology applied to dairy cattle and other cattle the following data was used: | ||
- | * gross feed intake in MJ per year, country specific data from the annual reporting of greenhouse gas emissions, see NIR 2022, Chapter 5.1.3.3, | + | * gross feed intake in MJ per year, country specific data from the annual reporting of greenhouse gas emissions, see NIR 2023, Chapter 5.1.3.3, |
- | * proportion x< | + | * proportion x< |
* FRAC< | * FRAC< | ||
* FRAC< | * FRAC< |