meta data for this page
  •  

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
sector:agriculture:start [2022/02/07 06:45] – [Visual overview] gniffkesector:agriculture:start [2023/05/05 10:44] (current) – [Short description] doering
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== Chapter 5 - NFR 3 - Agriculture (OVERVIEW) ====== ====== Chapter 5 - NFR 3 - Agriculture (OVERVIEW) ======
  
-Emissions occurring in the agricultural sector in Germany derive from manure management (NFR 3.B), agricultural soils (NFR 3.D) and agriculture other (NFR 3.I). Germany does not report emissions in  category field burning (NFR 3.F) (key note: NO), because burning of agricultural residues is prohibited by law (see Vos et al., 2022)((Vos, C., Rösemann C., Haenel H-D., Dämmgen U., Döring U., Wulf S., Eurich-Menden B., Freibauer A., Döhler H., Schreiner C., Osterburg B. & Fuß, R. (2022): Calculations of gaseous and particulate emissions from German Agriculture 1990 –2020. Report on methods and data (RMD), Submission 2022. Thünen Report (in preparation).https://www.thuenen.de/de/ak/arbeitsbereiche/emissionsinventare/)). 
  
 ^  NFR-Code    Name of Category                                                                       ^ ^  NFR-Code    Name of Category                                                                       ^
Line 13: Line 12:
  
 Emissions occurring in the agricultural sector in Germany derive from manure management (NFR 3.B), agricultural soils (NFR 3.D) and agriculture other (NFR 3.I). Emissions occurring in the agricultural sector in Germany derive from manure management (NFR 3.B), agricultural soils (NFR 3.D) and agriculture other (NFR 3.I).
-Germany does not report emissions in category field burning (NFR 3.F) (key note: NO), because burning of agricultural residues is prohibited by law (see Vos et al., 2022).+Germany does not report emissions in category field burning (NFR 3.F) (key note: NO), because burning of agricultural residues is prohibited by law (see Rösemann et al., 2023)((Rösemann C, Vos C, Haenel H-D, Dämmgen U, Döring U, Wulf S, Eurich-Menden B, Freibauer A, Döhler H, Steuer, B, Osterburg B, Fuß R (2023) Calculations of gaseous and particulate emissions from German agriculture 1990 – 2021 : Report on methods and data (RMD) Submission 2023. www.eminv-agriculture.de)).
  
 The pollutants reported are: The pollutants reported are:
Line 25: Line 24:
 No heavy metal emissions are reported. No heavy metal emissions are reported.
  
-In 2020 the agricultural sector emitted  512.3 Gg of NH<sub>3</sub>, 108.Gg of NO<sub>x</sub>,  298.Gg of NMVOC,  60.Gg of TSP, 30.Gg of PM<sub>10</sub> and 4,4 Gg of PM<sub>2.5</sub> and 1.05 kg HCB. The trend from 1990 onwards is shown in the graph below. The sharp decrease of emissions from 1990 to 1991 is due to a reduction of livestock population in the New Länder (former GDR) following the German reunification. The increase of NH<sub>3</sub> emissions since 2005 is mostly due to the expansion of anaerobic digestion of energy crops, especially the application of the digestion residues. This is a new emission source which also effects NO<sub>x</sub> emissions. The decrease of NH<sub>3</sub> emissions since 2015 is mostly due to a decline in the amounts of mineral fertilizer sold and stricter regulations concerning application of urea fertilizers. Further details concerning trends can be found in Vos et al., 2022Chapter 2.+In 2021 the agricultural sector emitted  482.3 Gg of NH<sub>3</sub>, 108.Gg of NO<sub>x</sub>,  290.Gg of NMVOC,  60.Gg of TSP, 33.Gg of PM<sub>10</sub> and 5.3 Gg of PM<sub>2.5</sub> and 0.56 kg HCB. The trend from 1990 onwards is shown in the graph below. The sharp decrease of emissions from 1990 to 1991 is due to a reduction of livestock population in the New Länder (former GDR) following the German reunification. The increase of NH<sub>3</sub> emissions since 2005 is mostly due to the expansion of anaerobic digestion of energy crops, especially the application of the digestion residues. This is a new emission source which also effects NO<sub>x</sub> emissions. The decrease of NH<sub>3</sub> emissions since 2015 is mostly due to a decline in the amounts of mineral fertilizer sold and stricter regulations concerning application of urea fertilizers. Further details concerning trends can be found in Rösemann et al., 2023chapter “Emissions results submission 2023”.
  
-As depicted in the diagram below, in 2020 95.% of Germany’s total NH<sub>3</sub> emissions derived from the agricultural sector, while nitric oxides reported as NO<sub>x</sub> contributed 11.% and NMVOC 28.% to the total NOx and NMVOC emissions of Germany. Regarding the emissions of PM<sub>2.5</sub>, PM<sub>10</sub> and TSP the agricultural sector contributed 5.% (PM2.5), 16.7 and 17.%, respectively, to the national particle emissions. +As depicted in the diagram below, in 2021 93.% of Germany’s total NH<sub>3</sub> emissions derived from the agricultural sector, while nitric oxides reported as NO<sub>x</sub> contributed 11.% and NMVOC 27.% to the total NOx and NMVOC emissions of Germany. Regarding the emissions of PM<sub>2.5</sub>, PM<sub>10</sub> and TSP the agricultural sector contributed 6.% (PM2.5),  and 18.%, respectively, to the national particle emissions. 
-HCB emissions of pesticide use contributed 22.1 % to the total German emissions.+HCB emissions of pesticide use contributed 12,3 % to the total German emissions.
  
  
Line 37: Line 36:
   * changes in animal numbers and amount of applied fertilizers    * changes in animal numbers and amount of applied fertilizers 
  
-  * air scrubbing techniques: yearly updated data on frequencies of air scrubbing facilities and the removal efficiency are provided by KTBL (Kuratorium für Technik und Bauwesen in der Landwirtschaft / Association for Technology and Structures in Agriculture). The average removal efficiency of NH<sub>3</sub> is 80 % for swine and 70 % for poultry, while for TSP and PM<sub>10</sub> the rates are set to 90 % and for PM<sub>2.5</sub> to 70 % for both animal categories. For swine two types of air scrubbers are distinguished: certified systems that remove both NH<sub>3</sub> and particles, and non-certified systems that remove only particles reliably.+  * air scrubbing techniques: yearly updated data on frequencies of air scrubbing facilities and the removal efficiency are provided by KTBL (Kuratorium für Technik und Bauwesen in der Landwirtschaft / Association for Technology and Structures in Agriculture) and from the agricultural census 2020. The average removal efficiency of NH<sub>3</sub> is 80 % for swine and 70 % for poultry, while for TSP and PM<sub>10</sub> the rates are set to 90 % and for PM<sub>2.5</sub> to 70 % for both animal categories. For swine two types of air scrubbers are distinguished: first class systems that remove both NH<sub>3</sub> and particles, and second class systems that remove only particles reliably and have an ammonia removal efficiency of 20%.
  
   * reduced raw protein content in feeding of fattening pigs: the german animal nutrition association (DVT, Deutscher Verband Tiernahrung e.V.) provides data on the raw protein content of fattening pig feed, therefore enabling the inventory to depict the changes in N-excretions over the time series. The time series is calibrated using data from official and representative surveys conducted by the Federal Statistical Office.   * reduced raw protein content in feeding of fattening pigs: the german animal nutrition association (DVT, Deutscher Verband Tiernahrung e.V.) provides data on the raw protein content of fattening pig feed, therefore enabling the inventory to depict the changes in N-excretions over the time series. The time series is calibrated using data from official and representative surveys conducted by the Federal Statistical Office.
Line 47: Line 46:
   * covering of slurry storage: agricultural censuses survey the distribution of different slurry covers. Germany uses distinct emission factors for the different covers.    * covering of slurry storage: agricultural censuses survey the distribution of different slurry covers. Germany uses distinct emission factors for the different covers. 
  
-  * use of urease inhibitors: for urea fertilizer the German fertilizer ordinance prescribes the use of urease inhibitors or the direct incorporation into the soil from 2020 onwards.+  * use of urease inhibitors: for urea fertilizer the German fertilizer ordinance prescribes the use of urease inhibitors or the direct incorporation into the soil from 2020 onwards.The NH<sub>3</sub> emission factor for urea fertilizers is therefore reduced by 70% from 2020 onwards, according to Bittman et al. (2014, Table 15)((Bittman, S., Dedina, M., Howard C.M., Oenema, O., Sutton, M.A., (eds) (2014): Options for Ammonia Mitigation. Guidance from the UNECE task Force on Reactive Nitrogen. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Edinburgh, UK.)).
  
-The NH<sub>3</sub> emission factor for urea fertilizers is therefore reduced by 70% from 2020 onwards, according to Bittman et al. (2014, Table 15)((Bittman, S., Dedina, M., Howard C.M., Oenema, O., Sutton, M.A., (eds) (2014): Options for Ammonia Mitigation. Guidance from the UNECE task Force on Reactive Nitrogen. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Edinburgh, UK.)). 
  
 For NO<sub>x</sub> and NMVOC no mitigation measures are included. For NO<sub>x</sub> and NMVOC no mitigation measures are included.
Line 59: Line 57:
 (see [[general:recalculations:start|Chapter 8.1 - Recalculations]]) (see [[general:recalculations:start|Chapter 8.1 - Recalculations]])
  
-The following list summarizes the most important reasons for recalculations. Recalculations result from improvements in input data and methodologies (for details see Vos et al. (2022), Chapter 3.5.2). +The following list summarizes the most important reasons for recalculations. Recalculations result from improvements in input data and methodologies (for details see Rösemann et al. (2023), Chapter 1.3). 
  
-1) Incorporation of data from the 2020 official agricultural census. This changes data on housing systemsmanure storage systems, manure application systems and cattle grazing. This results in some significant changes in the calculated emissions as far back as the year 2000 compared to the previous year's submission.+1) The results used from the 2020 agricultural census (LZ 2020) on the proportions of husbandry, storage or application methods and grazing were assumed to be true for the year 2019 and not for the year 2020 as in Submission 2022. This changes the data obtained by interpolation for the different proportions slightly, in some cases as far back as the year 2000. 
  
-2) Dairy cowsUpdate of milk yield and slaughter weight for the year 2019+2) Deep bedding systemsAs of the submission at hand, it is assumed that the NH<sub>3</sub> emissions from deep litter systems are fully covered by the housing emissions and that the emission factor for storage emissions is 0.  This was done because it can be assumed that in case of deep bedding systems manure will be spread immediately after removing it from the stable. This reduces the emissions from manure management while the emissions from application of manure (3.D.a.2.a) increases as more N is available for application.
  
-3) HeifersMinor changes in the nutrient content of some feed ingredients.+3) Dairy cowsMilk yield and slaughter weights for 2020 have been slightly corrected in the official statistics
  
-4) Suckler cowsmodeling of the energy requirement and feed intake has been updated and adapted based on the dairy cow model.+4) Heifers2020 slaughter weights have been slightly corrected in the official statistics.
  
-5) Male cattle > 2 yearsUpdate of weights from 1999 onwards.+5) Male beef cattle: In some years, slaughter ages and slaughter weights have been updated in the HIT database.
  
-6) SowsUpdate of the number of piglets per sow in 2019+6) PigsAir scrubbing techniques: From the 2020 agricultural census, for the first time official data on the number of air scrubbing systems were available. These data were used to derive a distinction between systems of “first” and “second” class (the latter having normal removal efficiency concerning TSP, PM<sub>10</sub> and PM<sub>2.5</sub> 
 +but reduced removal efficiency for NH<sub>3</sub>). The numbers of animal places equipped with “second class” systems were underestimated in previous submissions and therefore have a larger impact in the present submission. This influences mainly the emissions of TSP, PM<sub>10</sub> and PM<sub>2.5</sub> from the year 2005 onwards.
  
-7) Fattening pigsNew data on raw protein contentash content and digestibility of feed from 1990 onwards+7) SowsFor Lower Saxonythe number of piglets per sow and year was corrected (reduced) for the years 2015-2020
  
-8) BroilersNew data on raw protein content, ash content and digestibility of feed from 2000 onwardsUpdate of the national gross production of broiler meat in 2019.+8) Fattening pigsThe results of the additional survey "Protein use in pig fattening" by the Federal Statistical Office for the year 2020 were available for the feed parameter crude protein content of fattening pig feed (Federal Statistical Office2022). Through interpolation, the crude protein content and thus also the N excretions of the fattening pigs decrease back to the year 2011For Lower Saxony, the growth rates for the years 2018 and 2019 and the final weight for the year 2019 were corrected.
  
-9) Turkeys: Update of input data (slaughter weight, weight gain and feed conversion coefficient) for the years 2017-2019.+9) Broilers: Update of the national gross production of broiler meat in 2020.
  
-10) Geeseupdate (increase) of the amount of bedding material (strawand update (increaseof N-excretions for the whole time series.+10) Laying hensIntroduction of grazing emissions for laying hens, since the proportion of excrements from free-range laying hens on the pasture can now be estimated (Rösemann et al. 2023, Chapter 2.5). Based on the results of the LZ2020, a new NH<sub>3</sub> emission factor for floor housing was derived for 2020 (for the years 2011-2019, new emission factors result from linear interpolation). The NH<sub>3</sub> emission factor for free range housing systems is now equal to the NH<sub>3</sub>-EF for floor housing for the time not spent on pasture.
  
 11) Laying hens: Improved interpolation of start weights and final weights for the whole time series. 11) Laying hens: Improved interpolation of start weights and final weights for the whole time series.
    
-12) Pullets: Improved interpolation of start weights and final weights for the whole time series.+12) TSP, PM<sub>10</sub>, and PM<sub>2.5</sub> emissions from crop production: Emissions are now estimated using a Tier 2 methodology.
  
-13) Anaerobic digestion of animal manuresUpdate of activity data in all years. +13) Application of sewage sludge to soilsReplacement of extrapolated activity data in 2020 with data from the Federal Statistical Office
-  +
-14) Mineral fertilizers: : New weighting procedure for the latest year: 2020 weighted mean from 2019 (weight 1/3) and 2020 (weight 2/3)).+
  
-15Application of sewage sludge to soils: Update of activity data in 2018 and 2019Minor corrections of activity data in one federal state for the whole time series.+14Other organic fertilizersAs of the submission at hand, application emissions from digested waste, compost from biowaste, and compost from green waste are reported in the agriculture sector (3.D.a.2.c) for the first time. These emissions were included implicitly in the waste sector before.
  
-16) Anaerobic digestion of energy crops: Update of activity data in 2019. +15) Anaerobic digestion of energy crops: Update of activity data in 2020
-  +
-17) Soils: Minor corrections of cultivated areas and yields in several years.+
  
-18) Pesticides: Recalculations were made for the complete time series due to the changes and new information given by the BVL for the amount of domestic sales of the active substances Lindane (1990 – 1997)Chlorothalonil and Picloram (2019) and the maximum amount of HCB in the active substance Chlorothalonil of the FAO specification was used for the calculation in the period 2005 - 2017.+16) Pesticides: Recalculations were made for the complete time series due to the changes and new information given by the BVL for the amount of domestic sales of the active substances atrazinesimazine, propazine and quintozine.
  
  
  
 +===== Visual overview =====
  
-===== Visual overview ===== +__Emission trends for main pollutants in //NFR 3 - Agriculture//:__ 
-__Chart showing emission trends for main pollutants in //NFR 3 - Agriculture//:__ +{{ :sector:iir_nfr3.png?nolink&direct&700 |NFR 3 emission trends per category }} 
-[{{:sector:iir_nfr3.png?nolink&direct&600|NFR 3 emission trends per category}}] +{{ :sector:iir_nfr3_from_2005.png?nolink&direct&700 |NFR 3 emission trends per category, from 2005 }} 
-__Contribution of NFR categories to the emissions/Anteile der NFR-Kategorien an den Emissionen__ + 
-[{{:sector:cats_pollutants_incl_transport.png?nolink&direct&600|Contribution of NFR categories to the emissions}}]+__Contribution of NFRs 1 to 6 to the National Totals, for 2021__ 
 +{{ :sector:mainpollutants_sharesnfrs_incl_transport.png?direct&direct&700 Percental contributions of NFRs 1 to 6 to the National Totals}}
  
 ===== Specific QA/QC procedures for the agriculture sector===== ===== Specific QA/QC procedures for the agriculture sector=====
  
 Numerous input data were checked for errors resulting from erroneous transfer between data sources and the tabular database used for emission calculations. Numerous input data were checked for errors resulting from erroneous transfer between data sources and the tabular database used for emission calculations.
-The German IEFs and other data used for the emission calculations were compared with EMEP default values and data of other countries (see Vos et al., 2022). +The German IEFs and other data used for the emission calculations were compared with EMEP default values and data of other countries (see Rösemann et al., 2023). 
-Changes of data and methodologies are documented in detail (see  Vos et al. 2022, Chapter 3.5.2).+Changes of data and methodologies are documented in detail (see  Rösemann et al. 2023, Chapter 1.3).
  
-A comprehensive review of the emission calculations was carried out by comparisons with the results of Submission 2021 and by plausibility checks.+A comprehensive review of the emission calculations was carried out by comparisons with the results of Submission 2022 and by plausibility checks.
  
 Once emission calculations with the German inventory model Py-GAS-EM are completed for a specific submission, activity data (AD) and implied emission factors (IEFs) are transferred to the CSE database (Central System of Emissions) to be used to calculate the respective emissions within the CSE. These CSE emission results are then cross-checked with the emission results obtained by Py-GAS-EM. Once emission calculations with the German inventory model Py-GAS-EM are completed for a specific submission, activity data (AD) and implied emission factors (IEFs) are transferred to the CSE database (Central System of Emissions) to be used to calculate the respective emissions within the CSE. These CSE emission results are then cross-checked with the emission results obtained by Py-GAS-EM.