meta data for this page
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
sector:energy:fuel_combustion:small_combustion:mobile_small_combustion:fishing [2021/01/26 18:20] – [Table] kotzulla | sector:energy:fuel_combustion:small_combustion:mobile_small_combustion:fishing [2023/05/17 07:33] – [Planned improvements] kotzulla | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
===== Short description ===== | ===== Short description ===== | ||
- | In category //1.A.4.c iii// the emissions of Germany' | + | In NFR sub-category //1.A.4.c iii// fuel consumption and emissions of Germany' |
^ Method | ^ Method | ||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Primary fuel delivery data for national fishing is included in NEB lines 6 (' | Primary fuel delivery data for national fishing is included in NEB lines 6 (' | ||
- | The actual annual amounts used are therefore calculated within (Deichnik (2019)), where ship movement data (AIS signal) allows for a bottom-up approach providing the needed differentiation.[((bibcite 1))] | + | The actual annual amounts used are therefore calculated within (Deichnik (2022)), where ship movement data (AIS signal) allows for a bottom-up approach providing the needed differentiation.[(DEICHNIK2022)] |
__Table 1: Annual fuel consumption, | __Table 1: Annual fuel consumption, | ||
- | || ||= **1990** ||= **1995** ||= **2000** ||= **2005** ||= **2010** ||= **2011** ||= **2012** ||= **2013** ||= **2014** ||= **2015** ||= **2016** ||= **2017** ||= **2018** ||= | + | | |
- | ||~ Diesel | + | ^ Diesel |
- | ||~ Biodiesel ||> | + | ^ Heavy fuel oil | 33,3 | 26,0 | 26,0 | 24,4 | |
- | ||~ Heavy Fuel Oil ||> 24 ||> 18 ||> | + | | **Ʃ 1.A.4.c iii** |
- | || **Ʃ 1.A.4.c iii** ||~ 735 ||~ 567 ||~ 549 ||~ 508 ||~ 500 ||~ 467 ||~ 456 ||~ 452 ||~ 496 ||~ 565 ||~ 1, | + | |
- | > The strong increase after 2015 cannot be conclusively explained | + | The strong increase after 2015 cannot be conclusively explained at the moment. However, even if the over-all fuel quantities delivered to the navigation sector would be somehow misallocated between the specific nautical acitivities, |
- | > However, even if the over-all fuel quantities delivered to the navigation sector would be somehow misallocated between the specific nautical acitivities, | + | |
- | [[gallery size=" | + | ==== Emission factors |
- | : 1A4ciii_AD.png | + | |
- | : 1A4ciii_AD_bio.png | + | |
- | : 1A4ciii_AD_HFO.png | + | |
- | [[/ | + | |
- | + | ||
- | ++ Emission factors | + | |
The emission factors applied here, are derived from different sources and therefore are of very different quality. | The emission factors applied here, are derived from different sources and therefore are of very different quality. | ||
- | For the main pollutants, country-specific implied values are used, that are based on tier3 EF included in the BSH model [((bibcite 1))] which mainly relate on values from the EMEP/EEA guidebook | + | For the main pollutants, country-specific implied values are used, that are based on tier3 EF included in the BSH model [(DEICHNIK2020)] which mainly relate on values from the EMEP/EEA guidebook |
__Table 2: Annual country-specific emission factors, in kg/TJ__ | __Table 2: Annual country-specific emission factors, in kg/TJ__ | ||
- | || ||= **1990** ||= **1995** ||= **2000** ||= **2005** ||= **2010** ||= **2011** ||= **2012** ||= **2013** ||= **2014** ||= **2015** ||= **2016** ||= **2017** ||= **2018** ||= | + | | ^ |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||< | + | | **DIESEL OIL** ||||||||||||||||| |
- | ||~ NH,,3,, ||> 0.32 ||> 0.32 ||> 0.32 ||> 0.32 ||> 0.32 ||> 0.32 ||> 0.32 ||> 0.32 ||> 0.32 ||> 0.32 ||> 0.32 ||> 0.32 ||> 0.32 ||= | + | ^ NH<sub>3</ |
- | ||~ NMVOC ||> 50.0 ||> 50.0 ||> 50.0 ||> 50.0 ||> 50.0 ||> 50.0 ||> 50.0 ||> 49.8 ||> 50.4 ||> 49.6 ||> 50.7 ||> 51.5 ||> 52.9 ||= | + | ^ NMVOC |
- | ||~ NO,,x,, ||> 1,099 ||> 1,099 ||> 1,099 ||> 1,099 ||> 1,099 ||> 1,099 ||> 1,099 ||> 1,090 ||> 1,090 ||> 1,092 ||> 1,092 ||> 1,091 ||> 1,093 ||= | + | ^ NO<sub>x</ |
- | ||~ SO,,x,, ||> 466 ||> 419 ||> 233 ||> 186 ||> | + | ^ SO<sub>x</ |
- | ||~ PM ||> 291 ||> 262 ||> | + | ^ BC <sup>2</sup> |
- | ||~ BC^^3^^ ||> 84.2 ||> 75.8 ||> 42.1 ||> 33.7 ||> 12.6 ||> 11.8 ||> 11.8 ||> 12.3 ||> 12.0 ||> 12.4 ||> 11.7 ||> 11.2 ||> 10.4 ||= | + | ^ PM <sub>2.5</ |
- | ||~ CO ||> 102 ||> 102 ||> 102 ||> 102 ||> 102 ||> 102 ||> 102 ||> 106 ||> 103 ||> 107 ||> 101 ||> 96 ||> 90 ||= | + | ^ PM <sub>10</ |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||< | + | ^ TSP | |
- | ||~ NH,,3,, ||> 0.33 ||> 0.33 ||> 0.33 ||> 0.33 ||> 0.33 ||> 0.33 ||> 0.33 ||> 0.34 ||> 0.35 ||= NA ||= NA ||= NA ||= NA ||= | + | ^ CO |
- | ||~ NMVOC ||> 33.2 ||> 33.2 ||> 33.2 ||> 33.2 ||> 33.2 ||> 33.2 ||> 33.2 ||> 30.6 ||> 30.2 ||= NA ||= NA ||= NA ||= NA ||= | + | | **HEAVY FUEL OIL** |
- | ||~ NO,,x,, ||> 1,187 ||> 1,187 ||> 1,187 ||> 1,187 ||> 1,187 ||> 1,187 ||> 1,188 ||> 1,283 ||> 1,287 ||= NA ||= NA ||= NA ||= NA ||= | + | ^ NH<sub>3</sub> | |
- | ||~ SO,,x,, ||> 1.319 ||> 1.332 ||> 1.323 ||> 1.336 ||> 496 ||> 496 ||> 496 ||> 496 ||> 506 ||= NA ||= NA ||= NA ||= NA ||= | + | ^ NMVOC |
- | ||~ PM,, | + | ^ NO<sub>x</sub> | 1,258 | 1,258 | 1,258 | 1,258 | 1,258 | 1,258 | |
- | ||~ PM,,10,, ||> 516 ||> 521 ||> 518 ||> 523 ||> 194 ||> 194 ||> 194 ||> 164 ||> | + | ^ SO<sub>x</ |
- | ||~ TSP | + | ^ BC <sup>2</sup> |
- | ||~ BC^^3^^´||> 56.3 ||> 56.8 ||> 56.5 ||> 57.0 ||> 21.2 ||> 21.2 ||> | + | ^ PM <sub>2.5</sub> |
- | ||~ CO ||> 182 ||> 182 ||> 182 ||> 182 ||> 182 ||> 182 ||> | + | ^ PM <sub>10</sub> | |
- | ^^1^^ due to lack of better information: | + | ^ TSP | |
- | ^^2^^ ratios PM,,2.5,, : PM,,10,, : TSP derived from the tier1 default EF as provided in [((bibcite 2))] | + | ^ CO | |
- | ^^3^^ estimated from f-BCs as provided in [((bibcite 3))]: f-BC (HFO) = 0.12, f-BC (MDO/MGO) = 0.31 as provided in [((bibcite 2))], chapter: 1.A.3.d.i, 1.A.3.d.ii, 1.A.4.c.iii Navigation, Table 3-2 and Table A1 - BC fractions of PM emissions from relevant studies | + | <sup>1</ |
+ | < | ||
+ | Navigation, Table 3-2 and Table A1 - BC fractions of PM emissions from relevant studies | ||
> **NOTE:** For the country-specific emission factors applied for particulate matter, no clear indication is available, whether or not condensables are included. | > **NOTE:** For the country-specific emission factors applied for particulate matter, no clear indication is available, whether or not condensables are included. | ||
- | > For information on the **emission factors for heavy-metal and POP exhaust emissions**, | + | > For information on the **emission factors for heavy-metal and POP exhaust emissions**, |
Line 74: | Line 68: | ||
===== Recalculations ===== | ===== Recalculations ===== | ||
- | Recalculations occur only to the revised | + | With both **activity data and emission factors unaltered**, no recalculations occur against last year's submission. |
- | Here, due to a revision of the official blending rates, the amounts of biodiesel used in NFR 1.A.4.c iii have been revised for 2016 and 2017. | + | |
- | __Table 3: Revised biodiesel consumption estimates 2016 and 2017, in terajoules__ | ||
- | ||= ||||= **Biodiesel** ||||= | ||
- | ||= ||= **2016** ||= **2017** ||= | ||
- | ||~ Submission 2020 ||> | ||
- | ||~ Submission 2019 ||> | ||
- | ||~ absolute change ||> | ||
- | ||~ relative change ||> | ||
- | All **emission factors** remain unrevised, instead. | + | <WRAP center round info 65%> |
- | + | For **pollutant-specific information on recalculated emission estimates for Base Year and 2020**, please see the recalculation tables following [[general: | |
- | <WRAP center round info 60%> | + | |
- | For pollutant-specific information on recalculated emission estimates for Base Year and 2018, please see the pollutant specific | + | |
</ | </ | ||
Line 97: | Line 81: | ||
=====Planned improvements ===== | =====Planned improvements ===== | ||
- | > Besides a routine revision of the BSH model, further focus will be put on the correct allocation of actvity data to the different navigation activities covered in different NFR sub-sectors. | + | Besides a routine revision of the underlying |
+ | |||
+ | With respect to the This issue is under discussion with the BSH Hamburg as the agency in charge of the underlying model. However, activity data is based on ship movement data showing a correspondingly increasing trend. Nonetheless, | ||
- | ------ | ||
- | [[bibliography]] | + | [(DEICHNIK2022> |
- | : 1 : Deichnik (2019): Aktualisierung und Revision des Modells zur Berechnung der spezifischen Verbräuche und Emissionen des von Deutschland ausgehenden Seeverkehrs. from Bundesamts für Seeschifffahrt und Hydrographie (BSH); Hamburg, | + | [(EMEPEEA2019> |
- | : 2 : EMEP/EEA, 2019: EMEP/EEA air pollutant emission inventory guidebook – 2019; Chapter 1.A.3.d.i, 1.A.3.d.ii, 1.A.4.c.iii Navigation; URL: https:// | + | [(RENTZ2008> |
- | : 3 : Rentz et al., 2008: Nationaler Durchführungsplan unter dem Stockholmer Abkommen zu persistenten organischen Schadstoffen (POPs), im Auftrag des Umweltbundesamtes, | + | |
- | [[/ | + |