meta data for this page
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
sector:ippu:mineral_industry:lime_production:start [2021/12/21 09:26] – [Table] kludt | sector:ippu:mineral_industry:lime_production:start [2023/03/14 12:18] – [Table] kotzulla | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
===== Short description ===== | ===== Short description ===== | ||
- | ^ Category Code ^ Method | + | ^ Category Code ^ Method |
- | | 2.A.2 | T1 ||||| AS ||||| CS ||||| | + | | 2.A.2 | T1 |
- | ^ | + | ^ |
- | | 2.A.2 | -/- | -/- | | + | | Key Category: |
{{page> | {{page> | ||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
==== Emission factors ==== | ==== Emission factors ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Due to recommendation during NEC-Review 2021 the calculation of CO emissions from lime production is allocated to process emissions based on default-EF. The other EF are country-specific values from different research projects. | ||
__Table 1: Emission factors for quick-lime production__ | __Table 1: Emission factors for quick-lime production__ | ||
- | ^ pollutant | + | ^ pollutant |
- | ^ NOₓ || quicklime | + | ^ NO< |
- | ^ SO₂ || quicklime | + | ^ SO< |
- | ^ NMVOC | + | ^ NMVOC |
- | ^ TSP | + | ^ CO |
- | ^ PM₁₀ | + | ^ TSP |
- | ^ PM₂.₅ || quicklime | + | ^ PM< |
- | ^ Hg || quicklime | + | ^ PM< |
+ | ^ Hg | | ||
__Table 2: Emission factors for dolomite production__ | __Table 2: Emission factors for dolomite production__ | ||
- | ^ pollutant | + | ^ pollutant |
- | ^ NOₓ || dolomite | + | ^ NO< |
- | ^ SO₂ || dolomite | + | ^ SO< |
- | ^ NMVOC || dolomite | + | ^ NMVOC |
- | ^ TSP || dolomite | + | ^ CO |
- | ^ PM₁₀ | + | ^ TSP |
- | ^ PM₂.₅ || dolomite | + | ^ PM< |
- | ^ Hg | + | ^ PM< |
+ | ^ Hg | | ||
Line 53: | Line 57: | ||
=====Recalculations===== | =====Recalculations===== | ||
- | With **activity data** and **emission factors** remaining unrevised, no recalculations have been carried out compared to last year's submission. | + | With **activity data** and all already used **emission factors** remaining unrevised, no recalculations have been carried out compared to last year's submission |
+ | |||
+ | However, due to a recommendation during NEC-Review 2021, the calculation of CO emissions from lime production is allocated to process emissions and estimated and reported here for the first time. Therefore, the emission trend shows the recalculation in total. | ||
<WRAP center round info 60%> | <WRAP center round info 60%> | ||
- | For pollutant-specific information on recalculated emission estimates for Base Year and 2018, please see the pollutant specific recalculation tables following [[general: | + | For **pollutant-specific information on recalculated emission estimates for Base Year and 2020**, please see the pollutant specific recalculation tables following [[general: |
</ | </ | ||