meta data for this page
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| sector:other_and_natural_sources:natural_sources [2023/04/13 07:12] – kotzulla | sector:other_and_natural_sources:natural_sources [2023/04/13 07:22] (current) – [Table] kotzulla | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | ===== NFR 11.C - Other Natural Sources ===== | + | ===== 11.C - Other Natural Sources ===== |
| ====Short description ==== | ====Short description ==== | ||
| - | ^ NFR-Code | + | ^ NFR-Code |
| - | | 11.C | + | | 11.C | **Lightning** |
| - | Lightning and corona discharge during thunderstorm events cause atmospheric chemical reactions to take place at high voltages and high temperatures. These reactions cause the production of NOx in the atmosphere. | + | Lightning and corona discharge during thunderstorm events cause atmospheric chemical reactions to take place at high voltages and high temperatures. These reactions cause the production of NO< |
| ====Methodology==== | ====Methodology==== | ||
| Line 75: | Line 75: | ||
| ==== Uncertainties ==== | ==== Uncertainties ==== | ||
| - | The AD from BLIDS does have a low uncertainty of ± 3%. The uncertainties for the emission factors are estimated to be relatively high, being a default value. Hence the overall uncertainty for the emission estimation of NOx from lightning is qualified estimated by expert judgement to be high (>50%). | + | The AD from BLIDS does have a low uncertainty of ± 3%. The uncertainties for the emission factors are estimated to be relatively high, being a default value. Hence the overall uncertainty for the emission estimation of NO< |
| ====Quality checks==== | ====Quality checks==== | ||