meta data for this page
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
sector:waste:biological_treatment_solid_waste_disposal:start [2022/02/26 07:24] – schiller | sector:waste:biological_treatment_solid_waste_disposal:start [2024/11/06 14:50] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
===== Short description ===== | ===== Short description ===== | ||
- | ^ Category Code ^ Method | + | ^ Category Code ^ Method |
- | | 5.A | T1 ||||| NS | + | | 5.A | T1 |
- | ^ | + | ^ |
- | | 5.A | + | | Key Category: |
| | ||
\\ | \\ | ||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
All these measures have had strong impact on the formation of NMVOC, PM< | All these measures have had strong impact on the formation of NMVOC, PM< | ||
- | ===== Methodolgy | + | ===== Methodology |
- | For the estimation of NMVOC, Germany decided against the proposed EF of the EMEP/EEA Guidebook 2019, but instead for the Tier 1 approach of the US-EPA which is also reproduced there (Part B, 5.A, chap. 3.2.2, p. 5; [(EMEP/EEA, 2019: EMEP/EEA air pollutant emission inventory guidebook 2019, Copenhagen, 2019)]). According to national experts in the field, the approach of the US-EPA is more likely to produce better data, because the ratio between NMVOC (1.3 %) and CH< | + | For the estimation of NMVOC, Germany decided against the proposed EF of the EMEP/EEA Guidebook 2019, but instead for the Tier 1 approach of the US-EPA which is also reproduced there (Part B, 5.A, chap. 3.2.2, p. 5; [(EMEPEEA2019> |
- | Emissions for PM< | + | Emissions for PM< |
The EFs are multiplied with the total amount of solid waste (AD) treated in managed above-ground landfillings, | The EFs are multiplied with the total amount of solid waste (AD) treated in managed above-ground landfillings, | ||
**EM = AD * EF** | **EM = AD * EF** | ||
+ | |||
+ | As stated above the AD in use comprise the total amount of solid waste deposited above-ground, | ||
==== Activity data ==== | ==== Activity data ==== | ||
- | Data from 1990 until 2005 are made available for the UBA by the National Statistical Agency by means of a direct data provision (Statistisches Bundesamt, January 2019; ((Statistisches Bundesamt, Data provision by Mail, 14.01.2019; Data are confidential; | + | Data from 1990 until 2005 are made available for the UBA by the National Statistical Agency by means of a direct data provision (Statistisches Bundesamt, January 2019; [(Statistisches Bundesamt, Data provision by Mail, 14.01.2019; Data are confidential; |
- | From 2006 until today, Official statistical data (Statistisches Bundesamt, Fachserie 19, Reihe 1: Abfallentsorgung (Waste management), | + | From 2006 until today, Official statistical data (Statistisches Bundesamt, Fachserie 19, Reihe 1: Abfallentsorgung (Waste management), |
==== Emission factors ==== | ==== Emission factors ==== | ||
Line 36: | Line 38: | ||
===== Uncertainties ===== | ===== Uncertainties ===== | ||
- | The AD from Statistisches Bundesamt usually have an uncertainty of ±3% whereas the uncertainties for the PMs and TSP emission factors, according to the EMEP/EEA Guidebook (Part B, 5.A, chap. 3.2.2, Table 3-1, p. 5), were estimated to be: | ||
+ | The AD from Statistisches Bundesamt usually have an uncertainty of ±3% whereas the uncertainties for the PMs and TSP emission factors, according to the EMEP/EEA Guidebook (Part B, 5.A, chap. 3.2.2, Table 3-1, p. 5), were estimated as: | ||
+ | |||
+ | __Table 1: Uncertainty estimates of PM emission factors__ | ||
^ PM< | ^ PM< | ||
^ PM< | ^ PM< | ||
Line 45: | Line 49: | ||
===== Recalculations ===== | ===== Recalculations ===== | ||
+ | |||
Regular back-calculations are required annually for the previous year, since the waste statistics of the Federal Statistical Office are published with a one-year delay for the data on the quantities and compositions of waste deposited, so that the current reporting year must therefore be estimated. The estimate is replaced in the following year with the then current data.\\ | Regular back-calculations are required annually for the previous year, since the waste statistics of the Federal Statistical Office are published with a one-year delay for the data on the quantities and compositions of waste deposited, so that the current reporting year must therefore be estimated. The estimate is replaced in the following year with the then current data.\\ | ||
+ | |||
Since the recalculation required as a result is very small overall in each year, it will not be reported additionally here. | Since the recalculation required as a result is very small overall in each year, it will not be reported additionally here. | ||
However, in this year's reporting the need for correction of PM and TSP is higher than usual and thus a recalculation is reported (see following table). | However, in this year's reporting the need for correction of PM and TSP is higher than usual and thus a recalculation is reported (see following table). | ||
- | Recalculation: PM+TSP-emissions | + | __Table 2: Revised 2020 PM and TSP emissions, in [t]__ |
- | ^ | + | | |
- | | PM 2.5 [t] | NIR 2022 | + | ^ current submission |
- | | | + | ^ previous submission |
- | | PM 10 [t] | NIR 2022 | + | |
- | | | + | Additionally, |
- | | TSP [t] | NIR 2022 | + | |
- | | | + | |
+ | __Table 3: Revised NMVOC emissions, in [kt]__ | ||
+ | | ^ 1990 | ||
+ | ^ current submission | ||
+ | ^ previous submission | ||
- | Additionally, | + | <WRAP center round info 60%> |
+ | For **pollutant-specific information on recalculated emission estimates for Base Year and 2020**, please see the recalculation tables following [[general: | ||
+ | </WRAP> | ||