meta data for this page
  •  

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
sector:waste:biological_treatment_solid_waste_disposal:start [2023/03/16 14:08] – [Table] kotzullasector:waste:biological_treatment_solid_waste_disposal:start [2023/06/06 08:03] (current) – schiller
Line 27: Line 27:
 **EM = AD * EF** **EM = AD * EF**
  
-As stated above the AD in use comprise the total amount of solid waste deposited, meaning, that all mineral wastes are also included.+As stated above the AD in use comprise the total amount of solid waste deposited above-ground, meaning, that all mineral wastes (mineral/construction/demolition) are also included. Remaining fractions of these wastes (mineral/construction/demolition) go to underground landfills and therefore do not play a part in dust emissions. 
  
 ==== Activity data ==== ==== Activity data ====
Line 41: Line 41:
 The AD from Statistisches Bundesamt usually have an uncertainty of ±3% whereas the uncertainties for the PMs and TSP emission factors, according to the EMEP/EEA Guidebook (Part B, 5.A, chap. 3.2.2, Table 3-1, p. 5), were estimated as: The AD from Statistisches Bundesamt usually have an uncertainty of ±3% whereas the uncertainties for the PMs and TSP emission factors, according to the EMEP/EEA Guidebook (Part B, 5.A, chap. 3.2.2, Table 3-1, p. 5), were estimated as:
  
-__Table 1: Uncertainty estimates of emission factors__+__Table 1: Uncertainty estimates of PM emission factors__
 ^ PM<sub>2.5</sub>  |  -99% / +385%  | ^ PM<sub>2.5</sub>  |  -99% / +385%  |
 ^ PM<sub>10</sub>   |  -99% / +379%  | ^ PM<sub>10</sub>   |  -99% / +379%  |