meta data for this page
  •  

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
sector:waste:cremation:start [2022/03/22 11:07] – [Recalculations] kotzullasector:waste:cremation:start [2023/04/12 17:38] (current) – [Table] kludt
Line 13: Line 13:
 ====Activity data==== ====Activity data====
  
-Activity data for this category are based on data from the statistics of the "Bundesverband Deutscher Bestatter e.V."[(annual personal message from Stephan Neuser (contact URL: https://www.bestatter.de/verband/ansprechpartner/))]. For purposes of GHG reporting we specify cremations as masses, too. The cremation is a growing trend in funerals. +Activity data for this category are based on data from the statistics of the "Bundesverband Deutscher Bestatter e.V."[(annual personal message from Stephan Neuser (contact URL: https://www.bestatter.de/verband/allgemeines-ueber-den-bdb/))]. For purposes of GHG reporting we specify cremations as masses, too. The cremation is a growing trend in funerals. 
-^  unit  ^  1990  ^  1995  ^  2000  ^  2005  ^  2010  ^  2015  ^  2020  ^ + 
-|  kt    |  13.55 |  25.32 |  26.24 |  29.22 |  34.18 |  45.88 |  56.77 |+__Table 1: Annual amount of cremated human bodies, in [kt]__ 
 +^  1990   ^  1995   ^  2000   ^  2005   ^  2010   ^  2015   ^  2020   ^  2021  ^ 
 +|  13.55  |  25.32  |  26.24  |  29.22  |  34.18  |  45.88  |  56.77  | 60.19  |
 Source: own calculation, conversion is not described in more detail here for reasons of piety, but is done in a manner comparable to other publications. Source: own calculation, conversion is not described in more detail here for reasons of piety, but is done in a manner comparable to other publications.
 ====Emission factors==== ====Emission factors====
Line 25: Line 27:
 After the finalization of a research Project [(FKZ 3716 53 3021 „Umweltrelevanz und Stand der Technik bei Einäscherungsanlagen“ (Environmental relevance and state of the art for cremation plants); URL: https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/publikationen/umweltrelevanz-stand-technik-einaescherungsanlagen)] the Hg EF is revised. As part of the project, emission measurements were carried out at six cremation routes. According to OSPAR reporting 2010/2014, approx. 90% of the plants have effective Hg mitigation technology, whereas approx. 10% are not equipped with effective Hg mitigation technology. This ratio is roughly reflected in the 2020 project report, too. After the finalization of a research Project [(FKZ 3716 53 3021 „Umweltrelevanz und Stand der Technik bei Einäscherungsanlagen“ (Environmental relevance and state of the art for cremation plants); URL: https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/publikationen/umweltrelevanz-stand-technik-einaescherungsanlagen)] the Hg EF is revised. As part of the project, emission measurements were carried out at six cremation routes. According to OSPAR reporting 2010/2014, approx. 90% of the plants have effective Hg mitigation technology, whereas approx. 10% are not equipped with effective Hg mitigation technology. This ratio is roughly reflected in the 2020 project report, too.
 This results in the following weighted mean value:  This results in the following weighted mean value: 
-0.9*0.0225 g/h + 0.1*0.2468 g/h = 0.0449588207 g/h.  + 
 +<WRAP center round info 40%> 
 +0.9 x 0.0225 g/h + 0.1 x 0.2468 g/h = 0.0449588207 g/h. 
 +</WRAP> 
 +  
 Since the cremation duration is approximately one hour, the mean value per hour corresponds to the Hg load per cremation and is used accordingly in the inventory calculation. Values are interpolated between the two endpoints 2010 and 2018. Since the cremation duration is approximately one hour, the mean value per hour corresponds to the Hg load per cremation and is used accordingly in the inventory calculation. Values are interpolated between the two endpoints 2010 and 2018.
  
-EF for TSP, PM₁₀, and PM₂.₅ derive from the research study "Studie zur Korngrößenverteilung (PM₁₀ und PM₂.₅) von Staubemissionen" [(Dreiseidler, A.; Baumbach, G.; Pregger, T.; Obermeier, A. (1999): Studie zur Korngrößenverteilung (< PM₁₀ und < PM₂.₅) von Staubemissionen. UBA-Forschungsbericht 297 44 853, Umweltbundesamt Berlin (Study on particle size distribution (< PM₁₀ and < PM₂.₅) of dust emissions))].+EF for TSP, PM<sub>10</sub>, and PM<sub>2.5</sub> derive from the research study "Studie zur Korngrößenverteilung (PM<sub>10</sub> und PM<sub>2.5</sub>) von Staubemissionen" [(Dreiseidler, A.; Baumbach, G.; Pregger, T.; Obermeier, A. (1999): Studie zur Korngrößenverteilung (< PM<sub>10</sub> und < PM<sub>2.5</sub>) von Staubemissionen. UBA-Forschungsbericht 297 44 853, Umweltbundesamt Berlin (Study on particle size distribution (< PM<sub>10</sub> and < PM<sub>2.5</sub>) of dust emissions))]. 
 ===== Trends in emissions ===== ===== Trends in emissions =====
  
Line 34: Line 41:
  
 [{{:sector:waste:em_5c_crem_since_1990.png|**Emission trends in NFR 5.C.1.b.v**}}] [{{:sector:waste:em_5c_crem_since_1990.png|**Emission trends in NFR 5.C.1.b.v**}}]
-===== Recalculations ===== 
  
-With **activity data** and **emission factors** remaining unrevised, no recalculations have been carried out compared to last year's submission.+===== Recalculations =====
  
 <WRAP center round info 60%> <WRAP center round info 60%>
-For **pollutant-specific information on recalculated emission estimates for Base Year and 2019**, please see the recalculation tables following [[general:recalculations:start|chapter 8.1 - Recalculations]].+With **activity data and emission factors remaining unrevised**, no recalculations were carried out compared to Submission 2022.
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
 +