meta data for this page
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
sector:waste:open_burning:start [2022/08/09 13:19] – external edit 127.0.0.1 | sector:waste:open_burning:start [2023/04/12 07:41] – [Table] kotzulla | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
The following values are the result of evaluation: | The following values are the result of evaluation: | ||
- | __Table: | + | __Table |
- | ^ 1990 ^ 1995 ^ 2000 ^ 2005 ^ 2010 ^ 2015 ^ 2016 ^ 2017 ^ 2018 ^ 2019 ^ 2020 ^ | + | ^ 1990 ^ 1995 ^ 2000 ^ 2005 ^ 2010 ^ 2015 ^ 2016 ^ 2017 ^ 2018 ^ 2019 ^ 2020 |
- | | 431,394 | 414,276 | 397,157 | 380,038 | 362,919 | 345,800 | 342,376 | 339,466 | 336,556 | 319,531 | 135,170 | | + | | 431,394 | 414,276 | 397,157 | 380,038 | 362,919 | 345,800 | 342,376 | 339,466 | 336,556 | 319,531 | 135, |
====Emission factors==== | ====Emission factors==== | ||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
As discussed on Review 2020 regarding EF used and referenced: We use different EF from different references instead the EF of Table 3-1 Tier 1 emission factors for source category 5.C.2 Small-scale waste burning, because the Tier 1 EF seem not suitable for the burning of wooden wastes. We consider both fresh wood (garden and park waste) and dry wood (without coatings etc.). We have tried to find relevant parallels, especially because of the burning of fresh wood with regard to forest fires. But regarding the EF from GB 2019 we will evaluate the use as shown in the following table: | As discussed on Review 2020 regarding EF used and referenced: We use different EF from different references instead the EF of Table 3-1 Tier 1 emission factors for source category 5.C.2 Small-scale waste burning, because the Tier 1 EF seem not suitable for the burning of wooden wastes. We consider both fresh wood (garden and park waste) and dry wood (without coatings etc.). We have tried to find relevant parallels, especially because of the burning of fresh wood with regard to forest fires. But regarding the EF from GB 2019 we will evaluate the use as shown in the following table: | ||
- | ^ pollutant | + | ^ |
- | | CO | + | ^ CO | 58.0 |
- | | NOₓ | + | ^ NO< |
- | | SO₂ | + | ^ SO< |
- | | NMVOC | 47.0 | kg/ t | not correct used, error in data handling | + | ^ NMVOC |
- | | TSP | 17.0 | kg/ t | GB 2016 Forest fires, table 3-1, according 'wood burned' | + | ^ TSP |
- | | PM10 | 11.0 | kg/ t | GB 2016 Forest fires, table 3-1, according 'wood burned' | + | ^ PM< |
- | | PM₂.₅ | + | ^ PM< |
- | | BC | + | ^ BC | 0.81 |
- | | PCDD/ | + | ^ PCDD/ |
- | | PAH | 3.39 | g/ t | sum of single compounts | + | ^ PAH |
- | | BaP | + | ^ B[a]P | 1.3 | g/ t | IIR Ireland |
- | | BbF | + | ^ B[b]F | 1.5 | g/ t | IIR Ireland |
- | | BkF | + | ^ B[k]F | 0.5 | g/ t | IIR Ireland |
- | | IxP | + | ^ I[...]P |
- | | Pb | + | ^ Pb | 0.32 |
- | | Cd | + | ^ Cd | 0.13 |
\\ | \\ |