meta data for this page
  •  

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
general:adjustments:adjustment_de-a [2021/05/19 09:12] – [ANALYSING THE PROBLEM: THE EUROPEAN PERSPECTIVE BASED ON COPERT] kotzullageneral:adjustments:adjustment_de-a [2021/05/19 09:27] – kotzulla
Line 161: Line 161:
  
 __Table 2: annual NO<sub>x</sub> adjustment proposals, in kilotonnes__ __Table 2: annual NO<sub>x</sub> adjustment proposals, in kilotonnes__
-|                                  |  **2010**  |  **2011**  |  **2012**  |  **2013**  |  **2014**  |  **2015**  |  **2016**  |  **2017**  |  **2018**  | **2019**  | +|                                                         |  **2010**  |  **2011**  |  **2012**  |  **2013**  |  **2014**  |  **2015**  |  **2016**  |  **2017**  |  **2018**  | **2019**  | 
-| Adjustment 2014 (accepted) [(CEIP2014a)],[(CEIP2014b)] |  -105.6    |  -101.3    |  -95.7     |  -91.7     ^            ^            ^            ^            ^            ^           ^ +| Adjustment 2014 (accepted) [(CEIP2014a)],[(CEIP2014b)]  |  -105.6    |  -101.3    |  -95.7     |  -91.7     ^            ^            ^            ^            ^            ^           ^ 
-| Adjustment 2015 (accepted) [(CEIP2015a)],[(CEIP2015b)] |  -100.3    |  -95.5     |  -89.9     |  -85.1     ^            ^            ^            ^            ^            ^           ^ +| Adjustment 2015 (accepted) [(CEIP2015a)],[(CEIP2015b)]  |  -100.3    |  -95.5     |  -89.9     |  -85.1     ^            ^            ^            ^            ^            ^           ^ 
-| Adjustment 2016 (accepted) [(CEIP2016a)],[(CEIP2016b)] |  -151.3    |  -146.9    |  -145.1    |  -142.5    |  -128.1    ^            ^            ^            ^            ^           ^ +| Adjustment 2016 (accepted) [(CEIP2016a)],[(CEIP2016b)]  |  -151.3    |  -146.9    |  -145.1    |  -142.5    |  -128.1    ^            ^            ^            ^            ^           ^ 
-| Adjustment 2017 (accepted) [(CEIP2017a)] |  -151.3    |  -146.8    |  -145.0    |  -142.4    |  -127.2    |  -100.9    ^            ^            ^            ^           ^ +| Adjustment 2017 (accepted) [(CEIP2017a)]                |  -151.3    |  -146.8    |  -145.0    |  -142.4    |  -127.2    |  -100.9    ^            ^            ^            ^           ^ 
-| Adjustment 2018 (accepted) [(CEIP2018a)],[(CEIP2018b)] |  -172.3    |  -174.5    |  -177.4    |  -180.4    |  -171.5    |  -148.9    |  -123.2    ^            ^            ^           ^ +| Adjustment 2018 (accepted) [(CEIP2018a)],[(CEIP2018b)]  |  -172.3    |  -174.5    |  -177.4    |  -180.4    |  -171.5    |  -148.9    |  -123.2    ^            ^            ^           ^ 
-| Adjustment 2019 (accepted) [(CEIP2019a)],[(CEIP2019b)] |  -172.3    |  -174.5    |  -177.4    |  -180.3    |  -171.4    |  -148.8    |  -123.3    |  93.7      ^            ^           ^ +| Adjustment 2019 (accepted) [(CEIP2019a)],[(CEIP2019b)]  |  -172.3    |  -174.5    |  -177.4    |  -180.3    |  -171.4    |  -148.8    |  -123.3    |  -93.7     ^            ^           ^ 
-| Adjustment 2020 (accepted) [(CEIP2020)] |  -297.8    |  -302.3    |  -301.3    |  -306.1    |  -294.5    |  -269.0    |  -244.3    |  -214.9    |  -174.6    ^           ^ +| Adjustment 2020 (accepted) [(CEIP2020)]                 |  -297.8    |  -302.3    |  -301.3    |  -306.1    |  -294.5    |  -269.0    |  -244.3    |  -214.9    |  -174.6    ^           ^ 
-|                                                                                                                                                         ||||||||||| +|                                                                                                                                                                                ||||||||||| 
-^  Adjustment 2021 (proposal)      ^     -296.1 ^     -300.7 ^     -300.4 ^     -305.2 ^     -294.9 ^     -274.9 ^     -250.9 ^     -221.1 ^     -179.6 ^    -144.8 ^ +^  Adjustment 2021 (proposal)                             ^     -296.1 ^     -300.7 ^     -300.4 ^     -305.2 ^     -294.9 ^     -274.9 ^     -250.9 ^     -221.1 ^     -179.6 ^    -144.8 ^ 
-|  Change against Adjustment 2020  |        1.7 |        1.6 |        0.9 |        0.9 |       -0.4 |       -5.9 |       -6.6 |       -6.2 |       -5.0 |           |+|  Change against Adjustment 2020                         |        1.7 |        1.6 |        0.9 |        0.9 |       -0.4 |       -5.9 |       -6.6 |       -6.2 |       -5.0 |           |
  
 The noticeable differences between the 2017 and 2018 adjustment proposals resulted from an ad-hoc revision of the //Handbook Emission Factors for Road Transport// (HBEFA, version 3.3) in the aftermath of the so-called "Diesel-gate". [(KELLER2017)] The noticeable differences between the 2017 and 2018 adjustment proposals resulted from an ad-hoc revision of the //Handbook Emission Factors for Road Transport// (HBEFA, version 3.3) in the aftermath of the so-called "Diesel-gate". [(KELLER2017)]
Line 177: Line 177:
 The even bigger changes between adjustment 2019 and adjustment proposal 2020 result from an additional rather fundamental revision of of the //Handbook Emission Factors for Road Transport// now available in version 4.1 [(NOTTER2019)] strongly effecting the TREMOD model underlying Germany's emission reporting for road transport and hence any adjustments of NO<sub>x</sub> emissions. With such major model revision between submissions 2019 and 2020, the 2020 adjustment proposal differed significantly from the adjustment applied for and accepted in 2019.\\ The even bigger changes between adjustment 2019 and adjustment proposal 2020 result from an additional rather fundamental revision of of the //Handbook Emission Factors for Road Transport// now available in version 4.1 [(NOTTER2019)] strongly effecting the TREMOD model underlying Germany's emission reporting for road transport and hence any adjustments of NO<sub>x</sub> emissions. With such major model revision between submissions 2019 and 2020, the 2020 adjustment proposal differed significantly from the adjustment applied for and accepted in 2019.\\
 \\ \\
-**In comparison to 2020, the TREMOD model apllied for the 2021 submission has been revised only slightly in terms of NO<sub>x</sub> emission factors. Hence, the 2021 adjustment proposal differs onyl slightly from the (accepted) proposal provided with submission 2020.** +**In comparison to 2020, the TREMOD model applied for the 2021 submission has been revised only slightly in terms of NO<sub>x</sub> emission factors, taking into account results from ongoing measurement campaigns especially for EURO 6 vehicles. Hence, the 2021 adjustment proposal differs onyl slightly from the (accepted) proposal provided with submission 2020.**
- +
-**__Adjustment description as provided in IIRs 2014 and 2015:__** +
- +
-[[image Description%20Adjustment%20DE-A%20-%20NOx%20from%201.A.3.b%20Road%20transport%20-%20IIRs%202014%20%26%202015.pdf]] +
- +
------+
  
 [(EB2012a> EB, 2012a: CLRTAP EB Decision 2012/3, ECE/EB.AIR/111/Add.1: Adjustments under the Gothenburg Protocol to emission reduction commitments or to inventories for the purposes of comparing total national emissions with them [(EB2012a> EB, 2012a: CLRTAP EB Decision 2012/3, ECE/EB.AIR/111/Add.1: Adjustments under the Gothenburg Protocol to emission reduction commitments or to inventories for the purposes of comparing total national emissions with them