meta data for this page
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionLast revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
| sector:agriculture:manure_management:start [2021/02/12 12:52] – [Methodology] renamed to Method gniffke | sector:agriculture:manure_management:start [2021/12/15 20:00] – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| ===== Short description ===== | ===== Short description ===== | ||
| - | ^ NFR-Code | + | ^ NFR-Code |
| - | | **3.B ** | ** Manure Management** | + | | **3.B ** | ** Manure Management** |
| - | | **consisting of / including source categories** | + | | **consisting of / including source categories** |
| - | | 3.B.1.a & 3.B.1.b | + | | 3.B.1.a & 3.B.1.b |
| - | | 3.B.2, 3.B.4.d, 3.B.4.e | + | | 3.B.2, 3.B.4.d, 3.B.4.e |
| - | | 3.B.3 | Swine | T3 (NH< | + | | 3.B.3 | Swine | T3 (NH< |
| - | | 3.B.4.a | + | | 3.B.4.a |
| - | | 3.B.4.f | + | | 3.B.4.f |
| - | | 3.B.4.g i-iv | Poultry | + | | 3.B.4.g i-iv | Poultry |
| - | | 3.B.4.h | + | | 3.B.4.h |
| - | < | + | ^ Key Category |
| - | + | | 3.B.1.a | |
| - | ---- | + | | 3.B.1.b |
| - | Legend | + | | 3.B.2 |
| - | T = key source by Trend / L = key source by Level | + | | 3.B.3 |
| - | + | | 3.B.4.d | |
| - | ---- | + | | 3.B.4.e |
| - | + | | 3.B.4.g.i | |
| - | //Methods// | + | | 3.B.4.g.ii |
| - | D: | + | | 3.B.4.g.iii |
| - | RA: | + | | 3.B.4.g.iv |
| - | T1: Tier 1 / Simple Methodology * | + | |
| - | T2: Tier 2* | + | |
| - | T3: | + | |
| - | C: | + | |
| - | CS: Country Specific | + | |
| - | M: Model | + | |
| - | as described in the EMEP/CORINAIR Emission Inventory Guidebook | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | ---- | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | //AD:- Data Source for Activity Data // | + | |
| - | NS: | + | |
| - | RS: | + | |
| - | IS: | + | |
| - | PS: Plant Specific data | + | |
| - | AS: | + | |
| - | Q: specific questionnaires, | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | ---- | + | |
| - | //EF - Emission Factors// | + | |
| - | D: Default (EMEP Guidebook) | + | \\ |
| - | C: Confidential | + | |
| - | CS: Country Specific | + | |
| - | PS: Plant Specific data</ | + | |
| Line 60: | Line 38: | ||
| - | NO< | + | NO< |
| NMVOC emissions from category 3.B (manure management) contributed 97.2 % (295.8 kt) from total agricultural NMVOC emissions (304.4 kt). | NMVOC emissions from category 3.B (manure management) contributed 97.2 % (295.8 kt) from total agricultural NMVOC emissions (304.4 kt). | ||
| Line 150: | Line 128: | ||
| == N mass flow and emission assessment == | == N mass flow and emission assessment == | ||
| - | The calculation of the emissions of NH< | + | The calculation of the emissions of NH< |
| This approach differentiates between N excreted with faeces (organic nitrogen Norg, i. e. undigested feed N) and urine (total ammoniacal nitrogen TAN, i. e. fraction of feed N metabolized). The N flow within the manure management system is treated as depicted in the figure below. This method reconciles the requirements of both the Atmospheric Emission Inventory Guidebook for NH< | This approach differentiates between N excreted with faeces (organic nitrogen Norg, i. e. undigested feed N) and urine (total ammoniacal nitrogen TAN, i. e. fraction of feed N metabolized). The N flow within the manure management system is treated as depicted in the figure below. This method reconciles the requirements of both the Atmospheric Emission Inventory Guidebook for NH< | ||
| Line 283: | Line 261: | ||
| For the Tier 2 methodology applied to dairy cattle and other cattle the following data was used: | For the Tier 2 methodology applied to dairy cattle and other cattle the following data was used: | ||
| * gross feed intake in MJ per year, country specific data from the annual reporting of greenhouse gas emissions, see NIR 2021, Chapter 5.1.3.3, | * gross feed intake in MJ per year, country specific data from the annual reporting of greenhouse gas emissions, see NIR 2021, Chapter 5.1.3.3, | ||
| - | * proportion x house of the year the animals spend in the livestock building: country specific data, being equal to 1 – xgraz with xgraz the proportion of the year spent on pasture, see NIR 2021, Chapter 19.3.2, | + | * proportion x<sub>house</ |
| - | | + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | | + | |
| For all other animal categories the Tier 1 emission factors for NMVOC as provided in EMEP (2019)-3B-18, | For all other animal categories the Tier 1 emission factors for NMVOC as provided in EMEP (2019)-3B-18, | ||
| Line 338: | Line 316: | ||
| ===== TSP, PM10 and PM2.5 ===== | ===== TSP, PM10 and PM2.5 ===== | ||
| - | In 2019, TSP emissions from manure management amount to 71.1 % of total emissions from the agricultural sector. Within the emissions from manure management 22.4 % originate from cattle, 39.3 % from pigs, and 37.7 % from poultry. 42.7 % of the PM<ub> | + | In 2019, TSP emissions from manure management amount to 71.1 % of total emissions from the agricultural sector. Within the emissions from manure management 22.4 % originate from cattle, 39.3 % from pigs, and 37.7 % from poultry. 42.7 % of the PM<sub> |
| ==== Method ==== | ==== Method ==== | ||