meta data for this page
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
sector:agriculture:manure_management:start [2021/02/12 13:18] – [TSP, PM10 and PM2.5] gniffke | sector:agriculture:manure_management:start [2024/11/06 15:10] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
===== Short description ===== | ===== Short description ===== | ||
- | ^ NFR-Code | + | ^ NFR-Code |
- | | **3.B ** | ** Manure Management** | + | | **3.B ** | ** Manure Management** |
- | | **consisting of / including source categories** | + | | **consisting of / including source categories** |
- | | 3.B.1.a & 3.B.1.b | + | | 3.B.1.a & 3.B.1.b |
- | | 3.B.2, 3.B.4.d, 3.B.4.e | + | | 3.B.2, 3.B.4.d, 3.B.4.e |
- | | 3.B.3 | Swine | T3 (NH< | + | | 3.B.3 | Swine | T3 (NH< |
- | | 3.B.4.a | + | | 3.B.4.a |
- | | 3.B.4.f | + | | 3.B.4.f |
- | | 3.B.4.g i-iv | Poultry | + | | 3.B.4.g i-iv | Poultry |
- | | 3.B.4.h | + | | 3.B.4.h |
- | < | + | ^ Key Category |
- | + | | 3.B.1.a | |
- | ---- | + | | 3.B.1.b |
- | Legend | + | | 3.B.2 |
- | T = key source by Trend / L = key source by Level | + | | 3.B.3 |
- | + | | 3.B.4.d | |
- | ---- | + | | 3.B.4.e |
- | + | | 3.B.4.g.i | |
- | //Methods// | + | | 3.B.4.g.ii |
- | D: | + | | 3.B.4.g.iii |
- | RA: | + | | 3.B.4.g.iv |
- | T1: Tier 1 / Simple Methodology * | + | |
- | T2: Tier 2* | + | |
- | T3: | + | |
- | C: | + | |
- | CS: Country Specific | + | |
- | M: Model | + | |
- | as described in the EMEP/CORINAIR Emission Inventory Guidebook | + | |
- | + | ||
- | ---- | + | |
- | + | ||
- | //AD:- Data Source for Activity Data // | + | |
- | NS: | + | |
- | RS: | + | |
- | IS: | + | |
- | PS: Plant Specific data | + | |
- | AS: | + | |
- | Q: specific questionnaires, | + | |
- | + | ||
- | ---- | + | |
- | //EF - Emission Factors// | + | |
- | D: Default (EMEP Guidebook) | + | \\ |
- | C: Confidential | + | |
- | CS: Country Specific | + | |
- | PS: Plant Specific data</ | + | |
Line 60: | Line 38: | ||
- | NO< | + | NO< |
NMVOC emissions from category 3.B (manure management) contributed 97.2 % (295.8 kt) from total agricultural NMVOC emissions (304.4 kt). | NMVOC emissions from category 3.B (manure management) contributed 97.2 % (295.8 kt) from total agricultural NMVOC emissions (304.4 kt). | ||
Line 283: | Line 261: | ||
For the Tier 2 methodology applied to dairy cattle and other cattle the following data was used: | For the Tier 2 methodology applied to dairy cattle and other cattle the following data was used: | ||
* gross feed intake in MJ per year, country specific data from the annual reporting of greenhouse gas emissions, see NIR 2021, Chapter 5.1.3.3, | * gross feed intake in MJ per year, country specific data from the annual reporting of greenhouse gas emissions, see NIR 2021, Chapter 5.1.3.3, | ||
- | * proportion x house of the year the animals spend in the livestock building: country specific data, being equal to 1 – xgraz with xgraz the proportion of the year spent on pasture, see NIR 2021, Chapter 19.3.2, | + | * proportion x<sub>house</ |
- | | + | |
- | | + | |
- | | + | |
- | | + | |
For all other animal categories the Tier 1 emission factors for NMVOC as provided in EMEP (2019)-3B-18, | For all other animal categories the Tier 1 emission factors for NMVOC as provided in EMEP (2019)-3B-18, |