meta data for this page
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
sector:energy:fuel_combustion:other_including_military:military_transport:military_navigation [2021/01/15 17:11] – [Table] kotzulla | sector:energy:fuel_combustion:other_including_military:military_transport:military_navigation [2021/04/15 08:44] – [Emission factors] kotzulla | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
In sub-category //1.A.5.b iii - Other, Mobile (including Military)// emissions from military navigation are reported. | In sub-category //1.A.5.b iii - Other, Mobile (including Military)// emissions from military navigation are reported. | ||
- | ^ Method | + | ^ Method |
| T1, T2 | NS, M | D, M, CS, T1, T3 | see [[sector: | | T1, T2 | NS, M | D, M, CS, T1, T3 | see [[sector: | ||
- | ===== Method | + | ===== Methodology |
- | ===Activity Data === | + | ==== Activity Data ==== |
Primary fuel data for national military waterborne activities is included in NEB lines 6 (' | Primary fuel data for national military waterborne activities is included in NEB lines 6 (' | ||
- | The annual shares used within NFR 1.A.5.b iii are therefore calculated within (Deichnik, K. (2019)), where ship movement data (AIS signal) allows for a bottom-up approach providing the needed differentiation. | + | The annual shares used within NFR 1.A.5.b iii are therefore calculated within (Deichnik, K. (2020)) [(DEICHNIK2020)], where ship movement data (AIS signal) allows for a bottom-up approach providing the needed differentiation. |
__Table 1: Annual fuel consumption, | __Table 1: Annual fuel consumption, | ||
- | || ||= **1990** ||= **1995** ||= **2000** ||= **2005** ||= **2006** ||= **2007** ||= **2008** ||= **2009** ||= **2010** ||= **2011** ||= **2012** ||= **2013** ||= **2014** ||= **2015** ||= **2016** ||= **2017** ||= **2018** ||= | + | | | **1990** |
- | ||~ Diesel Oil ||> 983 ||> 665 ||> 563 ||> 410 ||> 383 ||> 366 ||> 360 ||> 349 ||> 347 ||> 330 ||> 313 ||> 302 ||> 332 ||> 273 ||> 359 ||> 489 ||> 423 ||> | + | ^ Diesel Oil |
- | ||~ Biodiesel ||> 0 ||> 0 ||> 0 ||> 9 ||> 11 ||> 16 ||> 18 ||> 24 ||> 22 ||> | + | ^ Biodiesel |
- | ||~ Heavy Fuel Oil ||> 0 ||> 0 ||> 0 ||> 0 ||> 0 ||> 0 ||> 0 ||> 0 ||> 0 ||> | + | ^ Heavy Fuel Oil |
- | || **Ʃ 1.A.5.b iii** ||~ 983 ||~ 665 ||~ 563 ||~ 419 ||~ 394 ||~ 382 ||~ 378 ||~ 373 ||~ 369 ||~ 351 ||~ 334 ||~ 319 ||~ 351 ||~ 286 ||~ 370 ||~ 500 ||~ 434 ||> | + | | **Ʃ 1.A.5.b iii** |
- | source: Deichnik, K. (2019): BSH model [((bibcite 1))] | + | source: Deichnik, K. (2020): BSH model [(DEICHNIK2020)] |
- | [[gallery size=" | + | {{ :sector: |
- | : 1A5biii_AD.png | + | |
- | : 1A5biii_AD_bio.png | + | |
- | [[/ | + | |
- | ++ Emission factors | + | ==== Emission factors |
The emission factors applied here, are derived from different sources and therefore are of very different quality. | The emission factors applied here, are derived from different sources and therefore are of very different quality. | ||
- | For the main pollutants, country-specific implied values are used, that are based on tier3 EF included in (Deichnik, K. (2019)) [((bibcite 1))] which mainly relate on values from the EMEP/EEA guidebook 2019 [((bibcite 2))]. These modelled IEFs take into account the ship specific information derived from AIS data as well as the mix of fuel-qualities applied depending on the type of ship and the current state of activity. | + | For the main pollutants, country-specific implied values are used, that are based on tier3 EF included in (Deichnik (2020)) [(DEICHNIK2020)] which mainly relate on values from the EMEP/EEA guidebook 2019 [(EMEPEEA2019)]. These modelled IEFs take into account the ship specific information derived from AIS data as well as the mix of fuel-qualities applied depending on the type of ship and the current state of activity. |
- | __Table 2: Annual country-specific emission factors for diesel fuels^^1^^, in kg/TJ__ | + | __Table 2: Annual country-specific |
- | || ||= **1990** ||= **1995** ||= **2000** ||= **2005** ||= **2006** ||= **2007** ||= **2008** ||= **2009** ||= **2010** ||= **2011** ||= **2012** ||= **2013** ||= **2014** ||= **2015** ||= **2016** ||= **2017** ||= **2018** ||= | + | |
- | ||~ NH,, | + | |
- | ||~ NMVOC ||> | + | |
- | ||~ NO,, | + | |
- | ||~ SO,, | + | |
- | ||~ BC ||> | + | |
- | ||~ PM,, | + | |
- | ||~ PM,, | + | |
- | ||~ TSP ||> | + | |
- | ||~ CO ||> | + | |
- | ^^1^^ due to lack of better information: | + | |
- | ^^2^^ ratio PM,,2.5,, : PM,,10,, : TSP derived from the tier1 default EF as provided in [((bibcite 2))] | + | |
- | ^^3^^ estimated from a BC-fraction of 0.31 as provided in [((bibcite 2))], chapter: 1.A.3.d.i, 1.A.3.d.ii, 1.A.4.c.iii Navigation, Table 3-2 | + | |
- | > **NOTE:** With respect to the emission factors applied for particulate matter, given the circumstances during test-bench measurements, condensables are most likely included at least partly.[[footnote]] During test-bench measurements, temperatures are likely to be significantly higher than under real-world conditions, thus reducing condensation. On the contrary, smaller dillution (higher number | + | | |
+ | ^ NH< | ||
+ | ^ NMVOC | ||
+ | ^ NO< | ||
+ | ^ SO< | ||
+ | ^ BC | 109 | 98,3 | 54,6 | 43,7 | 43,7 | 43,7 | 32,8 | 16,4 | 16,4 | 15,3 | 15,3 | 15,3 | 16,1 | 19,6 | 16,3 | 15,2 | 15,8 | 14,8 | | ||
+ | ^ PM< | ||
+ | ^ PM< | ||
+ | ^ TSP | ||
+ | ^ CO | 136 | 136 | 136 | 136 | 136 | 136 | 136 | 136 | 136 | 136 | 136 | 136 | 142 | 158 | 148 | 139 | 142 | 137 | | ||
+ | < | ||
+ | < | ||
+ | < | ||
- | > For information on the **emission factors for heavy-metal and POP exhaust emissions**, please refer to [[[ appendix2.3-HM-from-mobile-sources | Appendix 2.3 - Heavy Metal (HM) exhaust emissions from mobile sources]]] and [[[ appendix2.4-POPs-from-mobile-sources | Appendix 2.4 - Persistent Organic Pollutant (POP) exhaust emissions from mobile sources ]]]. | + | <WRAP center round info 100%> |
+ | With respect to the emission factors | ||
+ | </ | ||
- | [!-- | ||
- | + __Discussion of emission | + | <WRAP center round info 100%> |
+ | For information on the **emission | ||
+ | </ | ||
- | > This sub-category is **not considered separately in the key category analysis**. | ||
- | Due to the application of very several tier1 emission factors, most emission trends reported for this sub-category only reflect the trend in fuel deliveries. | + | ===== Recalculations ===== |
- | Therefore, the fuel-consumption dependend trends in emission estimates are only influenced by the annual fuel mix. | + | |
- | ++ Selected main pollutants: NO,,x,, | + | With both **activity data** and **emission factors** remaining unrevised, no recalculations took place with this submission. |
- | [[gallery size=" | + | <WRAP center round info 60%> |
- | : 1A5biii_EM(NOx).png | + | For pollutant-specific information on recalculated emission estimates for Base Year and 2018, please see the pollutant specific recalculation tables following chapter |
- | [[/gallery]] | + | </WRAP> |
- | ++ Sulphur dioxide and particulate matter | + | ===== Uncertainties ===== |
- | As fuel sulphur content underlies strict legislation, | + | See [[sector: |
- | [[gallery size=" | + | ===== Planned improvements ===== |
- | : 1A5biii_EM(SOx).png | + | |
- | : 1A5biii_EM(PM).png | + | |
- | [[/ | + | |
- | + | ||
- | --] | + | |
- | + | ||
- | + __Recalculations__ | + | |
- | + | ||
- | The small changes in the **activity data** applied result solely from a revised biofuel share for biodiesel in 2017: | + | |
- | + | ||
- | __Table 4: Revised fuel consumption data 2017, in terajoules__ | + | |
- | || ||= | + | |
- | ||~ Submission 2020 ||> | + | |
- | ||~ Submission 2019 ||> | + | |
- | ||~ absolute change ||> | + | |
- | ||~ relative change ||> | + | |
- | + | ||
- | In contrast, all (annual) country-specific **emission factors** remain unaltered. | + | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | > For more pollutant-specific information on **recalculated emission estimates for Base Year and 2017**, please see the pollutant specific recalculation tables following chapter [[[recalculations | 8.1 - Recalculations]]]. | + | |
- | + | ||
- | + __Uncertainties__ | + | |
- | + | ||
- | See [[[1-a-5-b-other-military-mobile-combustion | superordinate chapter]]] on NFR 1.A.5.b. | + | |
- | + | ||
- | + __Planned improvements__ | + | |
A **routine revision** of the underlying model is planned for the next annual submission. | A **routine revision** of the underlying model is planned for the next annual submission. | ||
- | ------ | ||
- | [[bibliography]] | ||
- | : 1 : Deichnik (2019): Deichnik, K.: Aktualisierung und Revision des Modells zur Berechnung der spezifischen Verbräuche und Emissionen des von Deutschland ausgehenden Seeverkehrs. from Bundesamts für Seeschifffahrt und Hydrographie (BSH); Hamburg, | + | [(DEICHNIK2020> |
- | : 2 : EMEP/EEA, 2019: EMEP/EEA air pollutant emission inventory guidebook 2019, Copenhagen, 2019. | + | [(EMEPEEA2019> |
- | : 3 : Rentz et al., 2008: Nationaler Durchführungsplan unter dem Stockholmer Abkommen zu persistenten organischen Schadstoffen (POPs), im Auftrag des Umweltbundesamtes, | + | [(RENTZ2008> |
- | [[/ | + |