meta data for this page
  •  

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
Last revisionBoth sides next revision
sector:energy:fuel_combustion:other_including_military:military_transport:military_navigation [2021/04/15 06:24] – kotzullasector:energy:fuel_combustion:other_including_military:military_transport:military_navigation [2021/05/27 08:05] – [Emission factors] kotzulla
Line 45: Line 45:
 ^ CO                |        136 |        136 |        136 |        136 |        136 |        136 |        136 |        136 |        136 |        136 |        136 |        136 |        142 |        158 |        148 |        139 |        142 |       137 | ^ CO                |        136 |        136 |        136 |        136 |        136 |        136 |        136 |        136 |        136 |        136 |        136 |        136 |        142 |        158 |        148 |        139 |        142 |       137 |
 <sup>1</sup> due to lack of better information: similar EF are applied for fossil and biodiesel \\ <sup>1</sup> due to lack of better information: similar EF are applied for fossil and biodiesel \\
-<sup>2</sup> ratio PM<sub>2.5</sub> : PM<sub>10</sub> : TSP derived from the tier1 default EF as provided in [((bibcite 2))]+<sup>2</sup> ratio PM<sub>2.5</sub> : PM<sub>10</sub> : TSP derived from the tier1 default EF as provided in [(EMEPEEA2019)]   \\
 <sup>3</sup> estimated from a BC-fraction of 0.31 as provided in [(EMEPEEA2019)], chapter: 1.A.3.d.i, 1.A.3.d.ii, 1.A.4.c.iii Navigation, Table 3-2 <sup>3</sup> estimated from a BC-fraction of 0.31 as provided in [(EMEPEEA2019)], chapter: 1.A.3.d.i, 1.A.3.d.ii, 1.A.4.c.iii Navigation, Table 3-2
  
 <WRAP center round info 100%> <WRAP center round info 100%>
-With respect to the emission factors applied for particulate matter, given the circumstances during test-bench measurements, condensables are most likely included at least partly.[[footnote]] During test-bench measurements, temperatures are likely to be significantly higher than under real-world conditions, thus reducing condensation. On the contrary, smaller dillution (higher number of primary particles acting as condensation germs) together with higher pressures increase the likeliness of condensation. So over-all condensables are very likely to occur but different to real-world conditions. ((During test-bench measurements, temperatures are likely to be significantly higher than under real-world conditions, thus reducing condensation. On the contrary, smaller dillution (higher number of primary particles acting as condensation germs) together with higher pressures increase the likeliness of condensation. So over-all condensables are very likely to occur but different to real-world conditions.))+With respect to the emission factors applied for particulate matter, given the circumstances during test-bench measurements, condensables are most likely included at least partly. ((During test-bench measurements, temperatures are likely to be significantly higher than under real-world conditions, thus reducing condensation. On the contrary, smaller dillution (higher number of primary particles acting as condensation germs) together with higher pressures increase the likeliness of condensation. So over-all condensables are very likely to occur but different to real-world conditions.))
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
- 
  
 <WRAP center round info 100%> <WRAP center round info 100%>
Line 57: Line 56:
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
  
 +===== Discussion of emission trends =====
 +
 +<WRAP center round info 60%>
 +As only NFR 1.A.5.b as a whole is taken into account within the key category analysis, this country-specific sub-sector is not considered separately.
 +</WRAP>
  
 ===== Recalculations ===== ===== Recalculations =====