meta data for this page
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionLast revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
sector:energy:fuel_combustion:small_combustion:mobile_small_combustion:fishing [2021/03/25 14:17] – [Table] kotzulla | sector:energy:fuel_combustion:small_combustion:mobile_small_combustion:fishing [2021/04/15 07:43] – [Planned improvements] kotzulla | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Primary fuel delivery data for national fishing is included in NEB lines 6 (' | Primary fuel delivery data for national fishing is included in NEB lines 6 (' | ||
- | The actual annual amounts used are therefore calculated within (Deichnik (2019)), where ship movement data (AIS signal) allows for a bottom-up approach providing the needed differentiation.[((bibcite 1))] | + | The actual annual amounts used are therefore calculated within (Deichnik (2020)), where ship movement data (AIS signal) allows for a bottom-up approach providing the needed differentiation.[(DEICHNIK2020)] |
__Table 1: Annual fuel consumption, | __Table 1: Annual fuel consumption, | ||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
The emission factors applied here, are derived from different sources and therefore are of very different quality. | The emission factors applied here, are derived from different sources and therefore are of very different quality. | ||
- | For the main pollutants, country-specific implied values are used, that are based on tier3 EF included in the BSH model [((bibcite 1))] which mainly relate on values from the EMEP/EEA guidebook | + | For the main pollutants, country-specific implied values are used, that are based on tier3 EF included in the BSH model [(DEICHNIK2020)] which mainly relate on values from the EMEP/EEA guidebook |
__Table 2: Annual country-specific emission factors, in kg/TJ__ | __Table 2: Annual country-specific emission factors, in kg/TJ__ | ||
Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
^ BC< | ^ BC< | ||
^ CO | 182 | 182 | 182 | 182 | 182 | 182 | 182 | 158 | 165 | NA |||^^ | ^ CO | 182 | 182 | 182 | 182 | 182 | 182 | 182 | 158 | 165 | NA |||^^ | ||
- | < | + | < |
- | < | + | < |
- | + | Navigation, Table 3-2 and Table A1 - BC fractions of PM emissions from relevant studies | |
- | + | ||
> **NOTE:** For the country-specific emission factors applied for particulate matter, no clear indication is available, whether or not condensables are included. | > **NOTE:** For the country-specific emission factors applied for particulate matter, no clear indication is available, whether or not condensables are included. | ||
- | > For information on the **emission factors for heavy-metal and POP exhaust emissions**, | + | > For information on the **emission factors for heavy-metal and POP exhaust emissions**, |
Line 68: | Line 66: | ||
===== Recalculations ===== | ===== Recalculations ===== | ||
- | Recalculations occur only to the revised **activity data** | + | Recalculations occur only due to the revised **activity data**. |
- | Here, due to a revision of the official blending rates, the amounts of biodiesel used in NFR 1.A.4.c iii have been revised for 2016 and 2017. | + | As, based on expert information, no biodiesel |
+ | |||
+ | In contrast, the amounts of diesel oil and heavy fuel oil modelled based on ship movement data remain unaltered. | ||
+ | |||
+ | __Table 3: Revised biodiesel consumption estimates, in terajoules__ | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | **Diesel oil** | ||
+ | ^ Submission 2021 | ||
+ | ^ Submission 2020 | ||
+ | ^ absolute change | ||
+ | ^ relative change | ||
+ | | **Biodiesel** | ||
+ | ^ Submission 2021 | ||
+ | ^ Submission 2020 | ||
+ | ^ absolute change | ||
+ | ^ relative change | ||
+ | | **Total fuel consumption** | ||
+ | ^ Submission 2021 | ||
+ | ^ Submission 2020 | ||
+ | ^ absolute change | ||
+ | ^ relative change | ||
- | __Table 3: Revised biodiesel consumption estimates 2016 and 2017, in terajoules__ | ||
- | ||= ||||= **Biodiesel** ||||= | ||
- | ||= ||= **2016** ||= **2017** ||= | ||
- | ||~ Submission 2020 ||> | ||
- | ||~ Submission 2019 ||> | ||
- | ||~ absolute change ||> | ||
- | ||~ relative change ||> | ||
- | All **emission factors** remain unrevised, instead. | + | All **emission factors** remain unrevised. |
<WRAP center round info 60%> | <WRAP center round info 60%> | ||
Line 91: | Line 102: | ||
=====Planned improvements ===== | =====Planned improvements ===== | ||
- | > Besides a routine revision of the BSH model, further focus will be put on the correct allocation of actvity data to the different navigation activities covered in different NFR sub-sectors. | + | Besides a routine revision of the underlying |
- | ------ | ||
- | [[bibliography]] | + | [(DEICHNIK2020> |
- | : 1 : Deichnik (2019): Aktualisierung und Revision des Modells zur Berechnung der spezifischen Verbräuche und Emissionen des von Deutschland ausgehenden Seeverkehrs. from Bundesamts für Seeschifffahrt und Hydrographie (BSH); Hamburg, | + | [(EMEPEEA2019> |
- | : 2 : EMEP/EEA, 2019: EMEP/EEA air pollutant emission inventory guidebook – 2019; Chapter 1.A.3.d.i, 1.A.3.d.ii, 1.A.4.c.iii Navigation; URL: https:// | + | [(RENTZ2008> |
- | : 3 : Rentz et al., 2008: Nationaler Durchführungsplan unter dem Stockholmer Abkommen zu persistenten organischen Schadstoffen (POPs), im Auftrag des Umweltbundesamtes, | + | |
- | [[/ | + |