meta data for this page
  •  

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
sector:energy:fuel_combustion:transport:civil_aviation:start [2021/04/09 09:41] – kotzullasector:energy:fuel_combustion:transport:civil_aviation:start [2021/04/15 07:57] – kotzulla
Line 125: Line 125:
 Within the IPCC EF data base, there are no default data provided for emissions of particulate matter (TSP, PM<sub>10</sub>, and PM<sub>2.5</sub>). Therefore, the EF for dust (**T**otal **S**uspended **P**articulate Matter – **TSP**) are taken over from Corinair (2006) [(CORINAIR2006)], giving specific values for an average fleet and for the two flight stages in table 8.2: For national flights 0.7 kg TSP/LTO and 0.2 kg TSP/t kerosene and 0.15 kg TSP/LTO and 0.2 kg TSP/t kerosene for international flights. Following this table, a kerosene consumption per LTO cycle of 825 kg for national and 1,617 kg for international flights have been assumed and the EF for the LTO stage have been estimated. Within the IPCC EF data base, there are no default data provided for emissions of particulate matter (TSP, PM<sub>10</sub>, and PM<sub>2.5</sub>). Therefore, the EF for dust (**T**otal **S**uspended **P**articulate Matter – **TSP**) are taken over from Corinair (2006) [(CORINAIR2006)], giving specific values for an average fleet and for the two flight stages in table 8.2: For national flights 0.7 kg TSP/LTO and 0.2 kg TSP/t kerosene and 0.15 kg TSP/LTO and 0.2 kg TSP/t kerosene for international flights. Following this table, a kerosene consumption per LTO cycle of 825 kg for national and 1,617 kg for international flights have been assumed and the EF for the LTO stage have been estimated.
  
-The EF for **water vapor (H<sub>2</sub>O)** provided by Eurocontrol (2004) is about 1,230g H<sub>2</sub>O / kg kerosene, whereas in Corinair (2006) [(CORINAIR2006)] 1,237g H<sub>2</sub>O /kg is assumed. Based on the stoichiometric assumptions mentioned above a EF(CO<sub>2</sub>) of 1.24 kg H,,2,,O/kg can be derived. To reduce the number of sources for EF, here, the Corinair value has been used for both flight stages and for both national and international flights.+The EF for **water vapor (H<sub>2</sub>O)** provided by Eurocontrol (2004) is about 1,230g H<sub>2</sub>O / kg kerosene, whereas in Corinair (2006) [(CORINAIR2006)] 1,237g H<sub>2</sub>O /kg is assumed. Based on the stoichiometric assumptions mentioned above a EF(CO<sub>2</sub>) of 1.24 kg H<sub>2</sub>O/kg can be derived. To reduce the number of sources for EF, here, the Corinair value has been used for both flight stages and for both national and international flights.
  
 As for **polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons** (PAH), tier1 EF from (EMEP/EEA, 2019) [(EMEPEEA2019)] have been apllied here. As the EMEP guidebook does not provide original EF for jet kerosene, values provided for gasoline in road transport have been used here as a proxy and will be replaced by more appropriate data as soon as this is available. As for **polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons** (PAH), tier1 EF from (EMEP/EEA, 2019) [(EMEPEEA2019)] have been apllied here. As the EMEP guidebook does not provide original EF for jet kerosene, values provided for gasoline in road transport have been used here as a proxy and will be replaced by more appropriate data as soon as this is available.