meta data for this page
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Next revision | Previous revision | ||
sector:energy:fuel_combustion:transport:civil_aviation:start [2021/01/16 16:39] – created kotzulla | sector:energy:fuel_combustion:transport:civil_aviation:start [2021/12/15 20:00] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
===== Short description ===== | ===== Short description ===== | ||
- | ^ NFR-Code | + | ^ NFR-Code |
| 1.A.3.a | | 1.A.3.a | ||
| // | | // | ||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| 1.A.3.a ii (ii) | [[sector: | | 1.A.3.a ii (ii) | [[sector: | ||
- | Air transports differ significantly from land and water transports with respect to emissions production. In air transports, fuels are burned under atmospheric conditions that a) differ markedly from those prevailing at ground level and b) can vary widely. The main factors that influence the combustion process in this sector include atmospheric pressure, environmental temperature and humidity – all of which are factors that vary considerably with altitude. | + | |
+ | Air transports differ significantly from land and water transports with respect to emissions production. In air transports, fuels are burned under atmospheric conditions that a) differ markedly from those prevailing at ground level and b) can vary widely. | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{ : | ||
+ | |||
+ | The main factors that influence the combustion process in this sector include atmospheric pressure, environmental temperature and humidity – all of which are factors that vary considerably with altitude. | ||
In category 1.A.3.a - Civil Aviation the emissions from both national (domestic) and international civil aviation are reported with separate acquisition of flight phases LTO (Landing/ | In category 1.A.3.a - Civil Aviation the emissions from both national (domestic) and international civil aviation are reported with separate acquisition of flight phases LTO (Landing/ | ||
- | Emissions from military aircraft are not included in this category but are reported under [[ 1.A.5.b | + | Emissions from military aircraft are not included in this category but are reported under military airborne combustion in NFR sub-category |
Country specifics: | Country specifics: | ||
The use of aviation gasoline is assumed to take place within the LTO-range of domestic flights only (below 3,000 feet). This assumption is a compromise due to a lack of further information and data. | The use of aviation gasoline is assumed to take place within the LTO-range of domestic flights only (below 3,000 feet). This assumption is a compromise due to a lack of further information and data. | ||
- | ===== Method | + | ===== Methodology |
NOTE: Data available from Eurocontrol via the European Environment Agency (EEA) is not being used for inventory compilation. Nonetheless, | NOTE: Data available from Eurocontrol via the European Environment Agency (EEA) is not being used for inventory compilation. Nonetheless, | ||
Line 30: | Line 35: | ||
Essential for emissions reporting is the separation of domestic and international air traffic. This happens using a so-called split factor representing the ratio of fuel consumption for national flights and the over-all consumption. | Essential for emissions reporting is the separation of domestic and international air traffic. This happens using a so-called split factor representing the ratio of fuel consumption for national flights and the over-all consumption. | ||
- | For determination of this ratio, results from TREMOD AV (TRansport Emissions MODel AViation) have been used, based on the great circle distances flown by the different types of aircraft (Knörr et al. (2019c) & Gores (2019)) [1], [2]. Here, the ratio is calculated on the basis of statistics on numbers of national and international flights departing from German airports provided by the Federal Statistical Office (Statistisches Bundesamt). | + | For determination of this ratio, results from TREMOD AV (TRansport Emissions MODel AViation) have been used, based on the great circle distances flown by the different types of aircraft (Knörr et al. (2020c) [(KNOERR2020c)] |
For further dividing kerosene consumption onto flight stages LTO and cruise, again results calculated within the TREMOD AV data base based on data provided by the Federal Statistical Office have been used. | For further dividing kerosene consumption onto flight stages LTO and cruise, again results calculated within the TREMOD AV data base based on data provided by the Federal Statistical Office have been used. | ||
Line 36: | Line 41: | ||
Emissions are being estimated by multiplying the kerosene consumption of the flight stage with specific emission factors (EF). Here, emissions of SO< | Emissions are being estimated by multiplying the kerosene consumption of the flight stage with specific emission factors (EF). Here, emissions of SO< | ||
- | The aviation gasoline (avgas) used is not added to the annual kerosene consumptions but reported separately. As proposed in (IPCC, 2006a), emissions caused by the incineration of avgas are calculated using adapted EF and calorific values following a tier1 approach. Here, a split into national and international shares is not necessary as avgas is supposed to only being used in smaller aircraft operating on domestic routes and within the LTO range. - This conservative assumption leads to a slight overestimation of national emissions.1 | + | The aviation gasoline (avgas) used is not added to the annual kerosene consumptions but reported separately. As proposed in (IPCC, 2006a) |
For further information on AD (entire time series), EF, key sources, and recalculations see sub-chapters linked above. | For further information on AD (entire time series), EF, key sources, and recalculations see sub-chapters linked above. | ||
- | === Activity Data === | + | ==== Activity Data ==== |
- | __**Kerosene**__ | + | Emissions estimation is mainly based on consumption data for jet kerosene and aviation gasoline as provided in the national Energy Balances (AGEB, |
- | + | ||
- | Emissions estimation is mainly based on consumption data for jet kerosene and aviation gasoline as provided in the national Energy Balances (AGEB, | + | |
Table 1: Sources for 1.A.3.a activity data | Table 1: Sources for 1.A.3.a activity data | ||
Line 54: | Line 57: | ||
__Table 2: Total inland fuel deliveries to civil aviation 1990-2019, in terajoules__ | __Table 2: Total inland fuel deliveries to civil aviation 1990-2019, in terajoules__ | ||
- | source: Working Group on Energy Balances (AGEB): National Energy Balances (AGEB, | + | ^ ^ **1990** |
+ | ^ Kerosene | ||
+ | ^ Avgas | 2.438 | 1.142 | 1.120 | 698 | 653 | 611 | 638 | 594 | 568 | 614 | 558 | 496 | 472 | 553 | 407 | 403 | 389 | 319 | | ||
+ | | **1.A.3.a** | ||
+ | |||
+ | source: Working Group on Energy Balances (AGEB): National Energy Balances (AGEB, | ||
For the present purposes, kerosene-consumption figures from NEB and BAFA statistics have to be broken down by national (= domestic) and international flights: | For the present purposes, kerosene-consumption figures from NEB and BAFA statistics have to be broken down by national (= domestic) and international flights: | ||
- | Here, the split has been calculated on the basis of statistics on numbers of national and international flights departing from German airports provided by the Federal Statistical Office (Statistisches Bundesamt) within TREMOD AV [1]. | + | Here, the split has been calculated on the basis of statistics on numbers of national and international flights departing from German airports provided by the Federal Statistical Office (Statistisches Bundesamt) within TREMOD AV [(KNOERR2020c)]. |
__Table 3: Ratios for calculating the shares of fuels used in 1.A.3.a ii - Domestic and 1.A.3.a i - International Civil Aviation, in %__ | __Table 3: Ratios for calculating the shares of fuels used in 1.A.3.a ii - Domestic and 1.A.3.a i - International Civil Aviation, in %__ | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | **1.A.3.a ii - Civil domestic aviation** | ||
+ | ^ Kerosene | ||
+ | ^ Avgas | ||
+ | | **1.A.3.a i - Civil international aviation** | ||
+ | ^ Kerosene | ||
+ | ^ Avgas | ||
- | __Table 4: Resulting annual shares of jet kerosene used in 1.A.3.a ii - Domestic and 1.A.3.a i - International Civil Aviation, in terajoules__ | + | __Table 4: Resulting annual shares of jet kerosene |
+ | | | ||
+ | | 1.A.3.a ii - Civil domestic aviation | ||
+ | ^ Kerosene | ||
+ | ^ Avgas | ||
+ | | 1.A.3.a i - Civil international aviation | ||
+ | ^ Kerosene | ||
+ | ^ Avgas | ||
+ | | 1.A.3.a - OVER-ALL | ||
+ | ^ Kerosene | ||
+ | ^ Avgas | ||
The deviation of the kerosene consumed onto the two flight stages LTO and cruise again has been carried based on TREMOD AV estimations allowing the export of kerosene consumption during LTO for both domestic and international flights. | The deviation of the kerosene consumed onto the two flight stages LTO and cruise again has been carried based on TREMOD AV estimations allowing the export of kerosene consumption during LTO for both domestic and international flights. | ||
__Table 5: Annual shares of LTO phase in domestic and international civil aviation, in %__ | __Table 5: Annual shares of LTO phase in domestic and international civil aviation, in %__ | ||
- | + | | | |
- | source: number of domestic and international flights as provided by the Federal Statistical Office (Destatis, | + | ^ 1.A.3.a i |
+ | ^ 1.A.3.a ii | 30,2 | 29,4 | 27,9 | 27,6 | 27,5 | 27,3 | 27,3 | 27,3 | 27,6 | 27,7 | 28,0 | 27,9 | 27,7 | 27,7 | 28,1 | 28,3 | 28,4 | 28,1 | | ||
+ | source: number of domestic and international flights as provided by the Federal Statistical Office (Destatis, | ||
a assumption: all aircraft using aviation gasoline are operated within the LTO-range below 3,000 feet and only for domestic flights | a assumption: all aircraft using aviation gasoline are operated within the LTO-range below 3,000 feet and only for domestic flights | ||
Cruise consumption is then calculated as the difference between Total Consumption minus LTO Consumption. | Cruise consumption is then calculated as the difference between Total Consumption minus LTO Consumption. | ||
- | **__Aviation Gasoline - AvGas__** | ||
- | Consumption | + | ==== Emission factors ==== |
+ | |||
+ | ===Kerosene=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Emissions have been calculated for each flight phase, based on the respective emission factors. Therefore, the EF used have been taken from a wide range of different sources. | ||
+ | In contrast to earlier submissions, | ||
+ | |||
+ | The EF provided with the current submission represent annual average EF for the entire fleet, calculated as implied EF from the emissions computed within TREMOD AV and therefore differ from the values used in the past. | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Sulphur dioxide (SO< | ||
+ | In IPCC 2006b [(IPCC2006)] with 1 kg SO< | ||
+ | |||
+ | As an EF decreasing due to improved production procedures and stricter critical levels seems plausible, for this report a constant decline between the annual values of 1.08 g SO< | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Nitrogen oxide (NO< | ||
+ | |||
+ | As a basis for these functions the EF of types of aircraft with given EF have been used (see: Knörr et al. (2020c)) [(KNOERR2020c)]. From the trend of the emissions calculated within TREMOD AV, annual average EF for the entire fleet have been formed, which have then been used for reporting. Hence, the EF differ widely from those used in earlier submissions. | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Ammonia (NH< | ||
+ | |||
+ | The EFs for **non-methane volatile organic compounds (NMVOC)** were calculated as the difference between the EF for over-all hydrocarbons (HC) and the EF for methane (CH< | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Particulate Matter** | ||
+ | Within the IPCC EF data base, there are no default data provided for emissions of particulate matter (TSP, PM< | ||
+ | |||
+ | The EF for **water vapor (H< | ||
+ | |||
+ | As for **polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons** (PAH), tier1 EF from (EMEP/EEA, 2019) [(EMEPEEA2019)] have been apllied here. As the EMEP guidebook does not provide original EF for jet kerosene, values provided for gasoline in road transport have been used here as a proxy and will be replaced by more appropriate data as soon as this is available. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The conversion of EF representing emissions per kilo fuel combusted [kg pollutant/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Aviation gasoline === | ||
+ | |||
+ | For aviation gasoline (avgas) a deviation onto LTO and cruise is assumed to be unnecessary. Therefore, there are no such specific EF used here. As for kerosene, | ||
+ | |||
+ | With respect to fuel characteristics, | ||
+ | |||
+ | There are different sorts of avgas sold with different **lead (Pb)** contents. As an exact annual ration of the sorts sold is not available, the most common type of avgas (AvGas 100 LL (Low Lead)) with a lead content of 0.56 g/l is set as an approximation. This value lies slightly below the value of 0.6 g/l as proposed in the EMEP Guidebook 2009. – For estimating lead emissions here the value provided for AvGas 100 LL has been converted into an EF of about 0.75 g lead/kg avgas using a density of 0.75 kg/l. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The **EF(TSP)** were calculated from the lead content of AvGas 100 LL by multiplication with a factor 1.6 as used for leaded gasoline in road transport in the TREMOD system. | ||
+ | |||
+ | For **NMVOC**, an EF from the Revised IPCC Guidelines 1996 (pages I 42 and 40) [(IPCC1996a)], | ||
+ | |||
+ | All other EF are not available specifically for small aircraft and therefore have been equalized with the EF used for kerosene, national, cruise. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The conversion of the EF from [kg emission/kg avgas consumed] into [kg emission/TJ energy converted] has been carried out using a net calorific value of 44,300 kJ/kg. | ||
+ | |||
+ | > **NOTE:** For the country-specific emission factors applied for particulate matter, no clear indication is available, whether or not condensables are included. | ||
+ | |||
+ | > For information on the **emission factors for heavy-metal and POP exhaust emissions**, | ||
+ | |||
+ | =====Recalculations===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | With the total kerosene inland deliveries remainig unchanged within the National Energy Balances, the domestic share of total kerosene consumption was revised based on revised fuel-consumption estimates for the LTO-cycle as derived from the EMEP/EEA air pollutant emission inventory guidebook 2016 [(EMEPEEA2019)]. | ||
+ | |||
+ | __Table 7: Revised percental shares of kerosene used for domestic flights, in %__ | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | **JET KEROSENE** | ||
+ | ^ Submission 2021 | ||
+ | ^ Submission 2020 | ||
+ | ^ absolute change | ||
+ | ^ relative change | ||
+ | | **AVGAS** | ||
+ | ^ Submission 2021 | ||
+ | ^ Submission 2020 | ||
+ | ^ absolute change | ||
+ | ^ relative change | ||
+ | |||
+ | As a result, the amounts of fuel allocated to sub-categories of //1.A.3.a i - Civil international aviation// and //1.A.3.a ii - Civil domestic aviation// had to be revised accordingly. | ||
+ | |||
+ | __Table 8: Revised amounts of fuel allocated to international (1.A.3.a i) and domestic (1.A.3.a ii) flights, in terajoules__ | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | ^ amounts allocated to 1.A.3.a i - Civil international aviation | ||
+ | | **JET KEROSENE** | ||
+ | ^ Submission 2021 | ||
+ | ^ Submission 2020 | ||
+ | ^ absolute change | ||
+ | ^ relative change | ||
+ | | **AVGAS** | ||
+ | ^ Submission 2021 | ||
+ | ^ Submission 2020 | ||
+ | ^ absolute change | ||
+ | ^ amounts allocated to 1.A.3.a ii - Civil domestic aviation | ||
+ | | **JET KEROSENE** | ||
+ | ^ Submission 2021 | ||
+ | ^ Submission 2020 | ||
+ | ^ absolute change | ||
+ | ^ relative change | ||
+ | | **AVGAS** | ||
+ | ^ Submission 2021 | ||
+ | ^ Submission 2020 | ||
+ | ^ absolute change | ||
+ | ^ relative change | ||
+ | |||
+ | <WRAP center round info 60%> | ||
+ | Polltutant-specific recalculations result from changes in the emission factors applied which are discussed further in the reffering sub-chapters. | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Planned improvements ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Besides the routine revision of the underlying model, no specific improvements are planned. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Uncertainties ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Information on uncertainties is provided here with most data representing expert judgement from the research project mentioned above. | ||
+ | |||
+ | For estimating uncertainties, | ||
+ | By additive linking of the squared partial uncertainties the overall uncertainty (U< | ||
+ | |||
+ | The uncertainties given here have been evaluated for all time series and flight stages as average values. | ||
+ | Estimating the overall uncertainty has been carried out as shown in the table below. In the very left column the components of the uncertainty estimations are listed with their partial uncertainties given in the next column. The next columns show the data linked to estimate the different overall uncertainties which themselves represent partial uncertainties for higher aggregated data and so on. | ||
+ | |||
+ | As an example, the uncertainty of the kerosene consumptions for domestic flights divided by flight stages (LTO and cruise) has been calculated from the partial uncertainty of the over-all kerosene consumption for domestic flights and the partial uncertainty of the LTO-cruise-split. Here, the split is based on the number of flights | ||
+ | |||
+ | Several partial uncertainties are based on assumptions. For example, the uncertainty given for the entire time series of the split factor domestic: | ||
+ | For the years 1990 to 2002 data is based upon estimations carried out within TREMOD AV which themselves are based on data from the Federal Statistical Office and EF from the EMEP-EEA data base. For 2003 to 2011 data from Eurocontrol are being used, that are calculated within ANCAT. Comparing results from the ANCAT model with actual consumption data show aberrations of ±12 %. Here, data calculated with AEM 3 model would have an uncertainty of only 3 to 5 % (EUROCONTROL 2006) [(EUROCONTROL2006)]. | ||
+ | |||
+ | As no uncertainty estimates were carried out for ammonia and particulate matter within the above-mentioned project, values from the PAREST research project mentioned for most over mobile sources were used. Here, the final report has not yet been published. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ===== FAQs ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Whereby does the party justify the adding-up of the two amounts given in BAFA table 7j as deliveries 'An die Luftfahrt' | ||
+ | |||
+ | For mineral oils, German National Energy Balances (NEBs) - amongst other sources - are based on BAFA data on the amounts delivered to different sectors. A comparison with consumption data from AGEB and BAFA shows that data from NEB line 76 /63: ' | ||
+ | |||
+ | **On which basis does the party estimate the reported lead emissions from aviation gasoline? | ||
+ | |||
+ | assumption by party: aviation gasoline = AvGas 100 LL | ||
+ | (AvGas 100 LL is the predominant sort of aviation gasoline in Western Europe)1 | ||
+ | lead content of AvGas 100 LL: 0.56 g lead/liter (as tetra ethyl lead)2 | ||
+ | |||
+ | The applied procedure is similar to the one used for calculating lead emissions from leaded gasoline used in road transport. (There, in contrast to aviation gasoline, the lead content constantly declined resulting in a ban of leaded gasoline in 1997.) | ||
+ | |||
+ | **On which basis does the party estimate the reported TSP emissions from aviation gasoline?** | ||
+ | The TSP emissions calculated depend directly on the reported lead emissions: The emission factor for TSP is 1.6 times the emission factor used for lead: EF(TSP) = 1.6 x EF(Pb). | ||
+ | The applied procedure is similar to the one used for calculating TSP emissions from leaded gasoline used in road transport. | ||
+ | [(AGEB2020> | ||
+ | [(BAFA2020> | ||
+ | URL: https:// | ||
+ | [(KNOERR2010> | ||
+ | [(KNOERR2020c> | ||
+ | [(GORES2020> | ||
+ | [(EMEPEEA2019> | ||
+ | [(EUROCONTROL2020> | ||
+ | [(IPCC2006a> | ||
+ | [(AGEB2020> | ||
+ | [(BAFA2020> | ||
+ | URL: https:// | ||
+ | [(DOEPELHEUER2002> | ||
+ | [(CORINAIR2006> | ||
+ | [(IPCC1996a> | ||
+ | [(IPCC1996b> | ||
+ | [(IPCC2000> | ||
+ | [(EUROCONTROL2006> |