meta data for this page
Add this page to your book
Remove this page from your book
2.B.10.a - Other Chemicals
In sub-category 2.B.10.a - Other Chemicals, emissions from the production of organic chemicals, titanium dioxide, sulphuric acid, carbon black, fertilizers and from the chlor-alkali industry are reported. Relevant pollutants are NMVOC, CO, PCDD/F, SOx, NH3, PM2.5, PM10, TSP and Hg.
Table 1: Overview of emission sources covered
Large Volume Organic chemicals
The annual production volumes for all large volume organic chemicals are extracted from national production statistics by the Federal Statistical Office [Lit. 1].
These chemicals comprise:
- Ethylene Dichloride
- Ethylene Oxide
- Formaldehyde (Methanal)
- Phthalic Anhydride
- Vinyl Chloride
- Polyethylene (LD/HD)
- Polyvinyl Chloride
- Styrene Copolymeres
The emission factors for the production of organic chemicals as shown in Tables 2 and 3 are derived from best reference documents for polymers and LVOC mostly for the early years. For later years, plant-specific data on an aggregated level were used.
Table 2: national NMVOC emission factors for producing organic chemicals, in kg/t
|Product||Acrylonitrile||Ethylbenzene||Ethylene||Ethylene Dichloride||Ethylene Oxide||Formaldehyde (Methanal)||Methanol||Phthalic Anhydride||Propene||Styrene||Vinyl Chloride|
Table 3: national NMVOC emission factors for producing polymers, in kg/t
|products||Polyethylene (PE)||Polypropylen (PP)||Polystyrene (PS)||Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC)||Styrene Copolymeres|
|Low density (LD)||High density (HD)|
|from 1990 to 1994||8||6||8||1||0.25||5|
The figures for carbon black production in the new German Länder in 1990 were taken from the Statistical Yearbook (Statistisches Jahrbuch) for the Federal Republic of Germany; the figures for 1991 and 1992 were estimated, due to confidentiality requirements. The other data for carbon-black production as of 1990 were obtained from national production statistics [Lit. 1].
From 2005 onwards, Germany uses activity data calculated from the CO2 emissions of the Emission Trading System (ETS), delivered by the German emission trading authority (DEHSt), and the default CO2 emission factor from the IPCC Guidelines 2006 for carbon black production. A comparison of the statistical data and the emission trading data leads to the conclusion, that the statistical data is most probably overestimated.
Table 4: Emission factors of carbon black in Germany, in kg/t
The activity data is also extracted from national production statistics by the Federal Statistical Office [Lit. 1] and consist of mono and multicomponent fertilizers.
The emission factors are country specific (Jörß et al. 2006) [Lit. 2] and are presented in the following table.
Table 5: Emission factors of fertilizers in Germany, in kg/t
|from 1990 to 1994||2||5||1|
The activity data for sulphuric acid production is from the Federal Statistical Office of Germany.
For the SOx EF for sulphuric acid production a survey was made in the year 2019. The producers were directly asked by the association. Based on the data from the producers, new EFs for the years 2017 and 2018 were developed. All emissions were measured by the producers respectively or limit values are specified in the permit decision for the installation. The EF is weighted by the amount of H2SO4 produced. Big producers have more influence on the EF than small producers. The EF is smaller than the Default-EF. This is due to significant process optimizations and technology improvements since 1990.
For the mercury losses from the Chlor-alkali industry, Germany uses the yearly published data from OSPAR on the plant specific production capacity for the AD and the plant specific emissions from the chlor-alkali industry. Because of the BAT (best available technique) conclusion for the Chlor-alkali industry, the production has stopped in 2017. However, emissions of Hg are still ocurring, because two plants still produce alcoholates and dithionite and are not regulated by the BAT conclusions for Chlor-alkali production. In both plants Chlor-alkali was also produced. The Hg-emissions from the production of dithionite and alcoholates were so far reported together with the Hg-emissions from Chlor-alkali production. The OSPAR convention does not request the Hg-emissions from dithionite and alcoholate production to be reported, so CEFIC does no longer report these emissions to OSPAR.
For SO2 emissions from titanium dioxide production and sulphuric acid production, and for Hg emissions from chlor-alkali industry, the emissions of the two last years are always actualized. This is because the emissions of the last year are always a prediction, as the final emissions are still not published by the time of reporting.
For specific information on recalculated emission estimates for Base Year and 2018, please see the pollutant specific recalculation tables following chapter 8.1 - Recalculations.
For the mercury losses from the Chlor-alkali industry, because of the BAT conclusion for the Chlor-alkali industry the production has stopped in 2017. However, emissions of Hg are still ocurring, because two plants are still producing alcoholates and dithionite and were so far reported by CEFIC to OSPAR based on BAT regulation for Chlor-alkali production. Since the OSPAR convention does not request to report the Hg-emissions from dithionite and alcoholate production, CEFIC no longer reports these emissions to OSPAR. Germany is trying to ensure reporting of Hg emissions for that sources.
Lit. 1: DESTATIS, Fachserie 4, Reihe 3.1, Produzierendes Gewerbe, Produktion im Produzierenden Gewerbe (“manufacturing industry; production in the manufacturing industry”)
Lit. 2: Umweltbundesamt, W: Jörß, V. Handke, Emissionen und Maßnahmenanalyse Feinstaub 2000-2020, 31.12.2006, Annex A, chapter A.2.4.8