meta data for this page
  •  

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
sector:energy:fuel_combustion:other_including_military:military_transport:military_aviation [2022/12/21 12:17] – kotzullasector:energy:fuel_combustion:other_including_military:military_transport:military_aviation [2023/03/13 14:51] (current) – kotzulla
Line 16: Line 16:
 For source category 1.A.5.b, consumption data for **kerosene**, until 1995, were drawn from a special analysis of the Working Group on Energy Balances (AGEB).  For source category 1.A.5.b, consumption data for **kerosene**, until 1995, were drawn from a special analysis of the Working Group on Energy Balances (AGEB). 
  
-For the years as of 1995, the official mineral-oil data of the Federal Republic of Germany (Amtliche Mineralöldaten der Bundesrepublik Deutschland 2012), prepared by the Federal Office of Economics and Export Control (BAFA), are used (BAFA, 2021) [(BAFA2021)]. Provided in units of 1,000 tonnes [kt], these amounts have to be converted into terajoules [TJ] on the basis of the relevant net calorific values given by (AGEB, 2021) [(AGEB2021)]. +For the years as of 1995, the official mineral-oil data of the Federal Republic of Germany (Amtliche Mineralöldaten der Bundesrepublik Deutschland 2012), prepared by the Federal Office of Economics and Export Control (BAFA), are used (BAFA, 2022) [(BAFA2022)]. Provided in units of 1,000 tonnes [kt], these amounts have to be converted into terajoules [TJ] on the basis of the relevant net calorific values given by (AGEB, 2022b) [(AGEB2022b)]. 
  
 As there is no consistent AGEB data availabe for **aviation gasoline**, delivery data from BAFA is used. As there is no consistent AGEB data availabe for **aviation gasoline**, delivery data from BAFA is used.
Line 32: Line 32:
 <sup>1</sup> possible reason for jumps in delivered amounts: storage (resulting in no (2008, 2011+) or very small deliveries (2009) (see also: FAQs) <sup>1</sup> possible reason for jumps in delivered amounts: storage (resulting in no (2008, 2011+) or very small deliveries (2009) (see also: FAQs)
  
-{{ :sector:energy:fuel_combustion:other_incl_military:1a5bii_ad_ker.png?700| Annual jet kerosene deliveries to the military }} +{{ :sector:energy:fuel_combustion:other_incl_military:1a5bii_ad_ker.png?700 | Annual jet kerosene deliveries to the military }} 
-{{ :sector:energy:fuel_combustion:other_incl_military:1a5bii_ad_avgas.png?700| Annual avgas deliveries to the military }}+{{ :sector:energy:fuel_combustion:other_incl_military:1a5bii_ad_avgas.png?700 | Annual avgas deliveries to the military }}
  
 ==== Emission factors ==== ==== Emission factors ====
Line 83: Line 83:
 Therefore, the fuel-consumption dependend trends in emission estimates are only influenced by the annual fuel mix. Therefore, the fuel-consumption dependend trends in emission estimates are only influenced by the annual fuel mix.
  
-{{:sector:energy:fuel_combustion:other_incl_military:1a5bii_em_sox.png?700| Annual sulphur oxides emissions}} +{{ :sector:energy:fuel_combustion:other_incl_military:1a5bii_em_sox.png?700 | Annual sulphur oxides emissions}} 
-{{:sector:energy:fuel_combustion:other_incl_military:1a5bii_em_co.png?700| Annual carbon monoxide emissions}}+{{ :sector:energy:fuel_combustion:other_incl_military:1a5bii_em_co.png?700 | Annual carbon monoxide emissions}}
  
 Here, as the EF(BC) are estimated via fractions provided in [(EMEPEEA2019)], black carbon emissions follow the corresponding emissions of PM<sub>2.5</sub>. Here, as the EF(BC) are estimated via fractions provided in [(EMEPEEA2019)], black carbon emissions follow the corresponding emissions of PM<sub>2.5</sub>.
Line 95: Line 95:
 As for avgas, the trend of consumption is more or less drecreasing steadily until 2005 but then shows a strong increase for 2006 and '07 (!), followed by no (2008 and 2011) or very small deliveris (2009, 2010). As mentioned above, there are no real consumption data available: AD is based on fuel deliveries to the military only. Thus, especially the trends for the use of aviation gasoline and the resulting emissions show this siginificant jumps in 2006 and 07, falling back to zero in 2008 and 2011ff. The party is aware of this issue and will try to solve it as soon as data allows. (see also: FAQ) As for avgas, the trend of consumption is more or less drecreasing steadily until 2005 but then shows a strong increase for 2006 and '07 (!), followed by no (2008 and 2011) or very small deliveris (2009, 2010). As mentioned above, there are no real consumption data available: AD is based on fuel deliveries to the military only. Thus, especially the trends for the use of aviation gasoline and the resulting emissions show this siginificant jumps in 2006 and 07, falling back to zero in 2008 and 2011ff. The party is aware of this issue and will try to solve it as soon as data allows. (see also: FAQ)
  
-=== Recalculations ===+===== Recalculations =====
  
-With both **activity data and emission factors unaltered**, no recalculations occur against last year's submission.  +<WRAP center round info 60%> 
- +For information on revised inventory data, please see the [[sector:energy:fuel_combustion:other_including_military:military_transport| superordinate chapter]].
-<WRAP center round info 65%> +
-For **pollutant-specific information on recalculated emission estimates for Base Year and 2020**, please see the recalculation tables following [[general:recalculations:start|chapter 8.1 - Recalculations]].+
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
  
Line 141: Line 139:
 The EF provided in [(EMEPEEA2019)] represent summatory values for (i) the fuel's and (ii) the lubricant's heavy-metal content as well as (iii) engine wear. Here, there might be no heavy metal contained the biofuels. But since the specific shares of (i), (ii) and (iii) cannot be separated, and since the contributions of lubricant and engine wear might be dominant, the same emission factors are applied to biodiesel and bioethanol. The EF provided in [(EMEPEEA2019)] represent summatory values for (i) the fuel's and (ii) the lubricant's heavy-metal content as well as (iii) engine wear. Here, there might be no heavy metal contained the biofuels. But since the specific shares of (i), (ii) and (iii) cannot be separated, and since the contributions of lubricant and engine wear might be dominant, the same emission factors are applied to biodiesel and bioethanol.
  
-[(AGEB2021>AGEB, 2021: Working Group on Energy Balances (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Energiebilanzen (Hrsg.), AGEB): Energiebilanz für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland; URL: http://www.ag-energiebilanzen.de/7-0-Bilanzen-1990-2019.html, (Aufruf: 29.11.2021), Köln & Berlin, 2021.)] +[(AGEB2022> AGEB, 2022: Working Group on Energy Balances (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Energiebilanzen (Hrsg.), AGEB): Energiebilanz für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland; https://ag-energiebilanzen.de/daten-und-fakten/bilanzen-1990-bis-2020/?wpv-jahresbereich-bilanz=2011-2020, (Aufruf: 23.11.2022), Köln & Berlin, 2022)] 
-[(BAFA2021>BAFA, 2021: Federal Office of Economics and Export Control (Bundesamt für Wirtschaft und Ausfuhrkontrolle, BAFA): Amtliche Mineralöldaten für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland; +[(AGEB2022b> AGEB, 2022b: Working Group on Energy Balances (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Energiebilanzen (Hrsg.), AGEB): Zusatzinformationen - Heizwerte der Energieträger und Faktoren für die Umrechnung von spezifischen Mengeneinheiten in Wärmeinheiten (2005-2020); URL: https://ag-energiebilanzen.de/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Heizwerte2005bis2020.pdf, (Aufruf: 13.03.2023) Köln & Berlin, 2022.)] 
-URL: https://www.bafa.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/Energie/Mineraloel/moel_amtliche_daten_2019_dezember.html, Eschborn, 2021.)]    +[(BAFA2022> BAFA, 2022: Federal Office of Economics and Export Control (Bundesamt für Wirtschaft und Ausfuhrkontrolle, BAFA): Amtliche Mineralöldaten für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland; 
-[(KNOERR2021b> Knörr et al. (2021b): Knörr, W., Heidt, C., Gores, S., & Bergk, F.: ifeu Institute for Energy and Environmental Research (Institut für Energie- und Umweltforschung Heidelberg gGmbH, ifeu): Aktualisierung des Modells TREMOD-Mobile Machinery (TREMOD MM) 2021, Heidelberg, 2021.)]+https://www.bafa.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/Energie/Mineraloel/moel_amtliche_daten_2021_12.xlsx;jsessionid=80E1FD32B36918F682608C03FDE79257.1_cid381?__blob=publicationFile&v=5, Eschborn, 2022.)] 
 +[(KNOERR2022b> Knörr et al. (2022b): Knörr, W., Heidt, C., Gores, S., & Bergk, F.: ifeu Institute for Energy and Environmental Research (Institut für Energie- und Umweltforschung Heidelberg gGmbH, ifeu): Aktualisierung des Modells TREMOD-Mobile Machinery (TREMOD MM) 2022, Heidelberg, 2022.)]
 [(EMEPEEA2019> EMEP/EEA, 2019: EMEP/EEA air pollutant emission inventory guidebook – 2019, Copenhagen, 2019.)] [(EMEPEEA2019> EMEP/EEA, 2019: EMEP/EEA air pollutant emission inventory guidebook – 2019, Copenhagen, 2019.)]
 [(RENTZ2008> Rentz et al., 2008: Nationaler Durchführungsplan unter dem Stockholmer Abkommen zu persistenten organischen Schadstoffen (POPs), im Auftrag des Umweltbundesamtes, FKZ 205 67 444, UBA Texte | 01/2008, January 2008 - URL: http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/en/publikationen/nationaler-durchfuehrungsplan-unter-stockholmer )] [(RENTZ2008> Rentz et al., 2008: Nationaler Durchführungsplan unter dem Stockholmer Abkommen zu persistenten organischen Schadstoffen (POPs), im Auftrag des Umweltbundesamtes, FKZ 205 67 444, UBA Texte | 01/2008, January 2008 - URL: http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/en/publikationen/nationaler-durchfuehrungsplan-unter-stockholmer )]
 [(KNOERR2009> Knörr et al. (2009): Knörr, W., Heldstab, J., & Kasser, F.: Ermittlung der Unsicherheiten der mit den Modellen TREMOD und TREMOD-MM berechneten Luftschadstoffemissionen des landgebundenen Verkehrs in Deutschland; final report; URL: https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/sites/default/files/medien/461/publikationen/3937.pdf, FKZ 360 16 023, Heidelberg & Zürich, 2009.)] [(KNOERR2009> Knörr et al. (2009): Knörr, W., Heldstab, J., & Kasser, F.: Ermittlung der Unsicherheiten der mit den Modellen TREMOD und TREMOD-MM berechneten Luftschadstoffemissionen des landgebundenen Verkehrs in Deutschland; final report; URL: https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/sites/default/files/medien/461/publikationen/3937.pdf, FKZ 360 16 023, Heidelberg & Zürich, 2009.)]
 [(IZT2007> IZT, 2007: Joerß, W. et al.: Emissionen und Maßnahmenanalyse Feinstaub 2000 – 2020, Institut für Zukunftsstudien und Technologiebewertung (IZT), Berlin, Im Auftrag des Umweltbundesamtes, FKZ 204 42 202/2, Dessau-Roßlau, August 2007 - URL: https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/sites/default/files/medien/publikation/long/3309.pdf )] [(IZT2007> IZT, 2007: Joerß, W. et al.: Emissionen und Maßnahmenanalyse Feinstaub 2000 – 2020, Institut für Zukunftsstudien und Technologiebewertung (IZT), Berlin, Im Auftrag des Umweltbundesamtes, FKZ 204 42 202/2, Dessau-Roßlau, August 2007 - URL: https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/sites/default/files/medien/publikation/long/3309.pdf )]