meta data for this page
  •  

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
appendices:appendix2.3-hm-from-mobile-sources [2024/04/05 08:13] – [Railways] kotzullaappendices:appendix2.3-hm-from-mobile-sources [2024/11/06 14:56] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
Line 60: Line 60:
  
 Besides these emissions from fuel combustion and engine wear, the German inventory also covers **abrasive emissions from brakes, wheels on rail and contact line**. Besides these emissions from fuel combustion and engine wear, the German inventory also covers **abrasive emissions from brakes, wheels on rail and contact line**.
-Here, a country-specific approach is applied with emissions of (i) chromium and nickel being estimated as part of the particle emissions from the wear of brakes, wheels and rails and whereas emissions of copper (ii) copper are estimated as part of the PM emissions from the contact line.+Here, a country-specific approach is applied with emissions of (i) chromium and nickel being estimated as part of the particle emissions from brake wear whereas emissions of copper (ii) copper are estimated as part of the PM emissions from the contact line. 
 + 
 +__Table 4: Country-specific emission factors for abrasive emissions, in g/km__ 
 +^                                 ^  PM<sub>2.5</sub>  ^  PM<sub>10</sub>  ^  TSP     ^  BC  ^  Pb  ^  Cd  ^  Hg  ^  As  ^  Cr      ^  Cu      ^  Ni      ^  Se  ^  Zn  ^ 
 +^ Contact line <sup>1</sup>       |            0.00016 |           0.00032 |  0.00032 |  NA  |  NA  |  NA  |  NA  |  NA  |  NA      |  0.00033 |  NA      |  NA  |  NA  | 
 +^ Tyres on rails <sup>2</sup>     |              0.009 |             0.018 |    0.018 |  NA  |  NA                                                              ||||||||| 
 +^ Braking system <sup>3</sup>     |              0.004 |             0.008 |    0.008 |  NA  |  NA  |  NA  |  NA  |  NA  |  0.00008 |  NA      |  0.00016 |  NA  |  NA  | 
 +^ Current collector <sup>4</sup>  |  NE                |  NE               |  NE      |  NE  |  NA                                                              ||||||||| 
 +<sup>1</sup> assumption: 100 per cent copper \\ 
 +<sup>2</sup> assumption: 100 per cent steel\\ 
 +<sup>3</sup> assumption: steel alloy containing Chromium and Nickel\\ 
 +<sup>4</sup> typically: aluminium alloy + coal contacts; no particulate matter emissions calculated yet
  
    
Line 66: Line 77:
 ===== Inland Vessels and Ships in 1.A.3.d ii ===== ===== Inland Vessels and Ships in 1.A.3.d ii =====
  
-__Table 4: Tier1 default emission factors applied to inland ships and vessels, in g/TJ__+__Table 5: Tier1 default emission factors applied to inland ships and vessels, in g/TJ__
 |                        ^  **Pb**  ^  **Cd**  ^  **Hg**  ^  **As**  ^  **Cr**  ^  **Cu**  ^  **Ni**  ^  **Se**  ^  **Zn**  ^ |                        ^  **Pb**  ^  **Cd**  ^  **Hg**  ^  **As**  ^  **Cr**  ^  **Cu**  ^  **Ni**  ^  **Se**  ^  **Zn**  ^
 ^  Diesel oil            |  1.21    |  0.233   |  0.123   |  0.002   |  1.16    |  39.6    |  1.63    |  0.233   |  23.3    | ^  Diesel oil            |  1.21    |  0.233   |  0.123   |  0.002   |  1.16    |  39.6    |  1.63    |  0.233   |  23.3    |
Line 76: Line 87:
 The following table provides the tier1 EF applied for HMs from ships and vessels in both civil and military operation in NFR categories 1.A.3.d i -International Maritime Navigation, 1.A.3.d ii - National Navigation (Shipping), 1.A.4.c iii -Fisheryand 1.A.5.b iii - Other: Military Navigation. The following table provides the tier1 EF applied for HMs from ships and vessels in both civil and military operation in NFR categories 1.A.3.d i -International Maritime Navigation, 1.A.3.d ii - National Navigation (Shipping), 1.A.4.c iii -Fisheryand 1.A.5.b iii - Other: Military Navigation.
  
-__Table 4: Tier1 default emission factors applied to maritime ships and vessels in g/TJ__+__Table 6: Tier1 default emission factors applied to maritime ships and vessels in g/TJ__
 |                             ^  **Pb**  ^  **Cd**  ^  **Hg**  ^  **As**  ^  **Cr**  ^  **Cu**  ^  **Ni**  ^  **Se**  ^  **Zn**  ^ |                             ^  **Pb**  ^  **Cd**  ^  **Hg**  ^  **As**  ^  **Cr**  ^  **Cu**  ^  **Ni**  ^  **Se**  ^  **Zn**  ^
 ^ Heavy Fuel oil<sup>1</sup>  |  4.46    |  0.50    |  0.50    |  16.9    |  17.8    |  31.0    |  793     |  5.20    |  29.7    | ^ Heavy Fuel oil<sup>1</sup>  |  4.46    |  0.50    |  0.50    |  16.9    |  17.8    |  31.0    |  793     |  5.20    |  29.7    |
Line 93: Line 104:
 Although the Party assumes that HM emissions are also likely to occur from the combustion of jet kerosene, no gap-filling is carried out for this fuel. Instead, all HM emission from jet kerosene are reported as //not estimated// (NE). Although the Party assumes that HM emissions are also likely to occur from the combustion of jet kerosene, no gap-filling is carried out for this fuel. Instead, all HM emission from jet kerosene are reported as //not estimated// (NE).
  
-__Table 5: Tier1 default emisison factors applied to aircraft, in g/TJ__+__Table 7: Tier1 default emisison factors applied to aircraft, in g/TJ__
 |                    ^  **Pb**             ^  **Cd**  ^  **Hg**  ^  **As**  ^  **Cr**  ^  **Cu**  ^  **Ni**  ^  **Se**  ^  **Zn**  ^ |                    ^  **Pb**             ^  **Cd**  ^  **Hg**  ^  **As**  ^  **Cr**  ^  **Cu**  ^  **Ni**  ^  **Se**  ^  **Zn**  ^
 ^ Kerosene           |   NE                                                                                                ||||||||| ^ Kerosene           |   NE                                                                                                |||||||||