meta data for this page
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
general:projections:wam-scenario [2024/02/12 10:05] – brauns | general:projections:wam-scenario [2025/04/04 12:51] (current) – eisold | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=== Additional measures that have not yet been implemented are assigned to the WAM scenario=== | === Additional measures that have not yet been implemented are assigned to the WAM scenario=== | ||
- | **Reduction in large coal combustion plants through | + | **Optional amendment of the 13< |
- | This measure assumes | + | The German Federal Government declared in its current NAPCP 2023, that an optional amendment |
- | When calculating the reduction | + | * **potential |
- | The calculation | + | According to the existing 13< |
- | __Table 10: Potential emission reductions of an accelerated coal phase-out compared | + | It is assumed for the sulfite process that all plants located in Germany are operated with an RTI of 50-300 MW. A maximum emission factor of 300 mg/ |
- | ^ Year ^ | + | |
- | ^ 2025 | -27.2 kt | -53.4 kt | -0.1 kt | -1.3 kt | | + | |
- | ^ 2030 | | + | |
- | __Reduction of coal use:__ | + | (5) implied NOx emission factor (sulfite process) = (2 kg/t * 85 mg/Nm³) / 300 mg/Nm³ = 0.57 kg/t |
- | The coal use in a year results for each relevant time series from the proportional distribution | + | In the field of the sulfate process |
- | Activity for a time series = [assigned activity of the time series in the reference scenario] / [total activity | + | |
- | This calculation results in a new value for each time series regarding coal use for each projection | + | The implied emission factor |
- | The calculation of the activity rate of the time series “Heat generation in medium combustion plants of public district heating plants” from raw lignite for the year 2025 is shown as an example. | + | (7) implied NOx emission factor (sulfate process) = (1.75 kg/t * 85 mg/Nm³) / 217.78 mg/Nm³ = 0.68 kg/t |
- | Calculation of the activity rate for raw lignite for “heat generation in medium combustion plants of public district heating plants” in 2025 = [AR<sub>Ref,2025</ | + | * **potential NO<sub>X</ |
- | + | ||
- | __Compensation through natural gas, hydrogen and renewable energies:__ | + | |
- | A proportional compensation | + | An optional amendment |
- | __Table 11: Substitution | + | For plants where a future limit value of 85 mg NO< |
- | ^ Year ^ | + | |
- | ^ Total primary energy consumption from coal use in MMS (= WM scenario) | + | |
- | ^ Total primary energy consumption from coal use in KIS | 774193 | + | |
- | ^ Additional primary energy consumption from natural gas (50 % efficiency) in the WAM scenario | | + | |
- | ^ Additional primary energy consumption from hydrogen | + | |
- | Table 11 shows the most important shifts in primary energy consumption in the WAM scenario. All data were derived from the 2021 projection report as well as the KIS report and can be extracted from the UBA projection database. | + | (8) implied NOx emission factor (refinery underfiring with light heating oil) = 85 mg/Nm³ / 3.49 = 24.4 kg/TJ |
- | For power generation from hydrogen only NO< | + | This results in future |
- | __Table 12: Assumed emission factors for power generation from hydrogen__ | + | For all plants that are assumed to use permission by applying the so-called bell rule, the potential effect of integrating a NO< |
- | ^ regulation ^ | + | |
- | ^ Industrial emissions directive (IED) (plants > 50 MW) | 60 | | + | |
- | ^ 44<sup>th</ | + | |
- | **Reductions in waste incineration and co-incineration plants through amendment of the 17< | + | (9) percentage NOx emission reduction (specific refinery) = 1 - (189.75 mg/Nm³ / 274.75 mg/Nm³) = 0.69 |
- | As part of a draft amendment | + | This exemplary relative reduction was than assumed |
- | The assumed | + | (10) NOx emission |
- | | + | |
- | In case, it is expected that this measure will be fully implemented in 2030. Thus, in the WAM scenario | + | Emissions from other LCPs, which emerge |
- | **NO< | + | The NO< |
- | + | ||
- | According to the existing 13< | + | |
- | + | ||
- | It is assumed for the sulphite process that all four plants > 50 MW located in Germany are operated with RTI of 50-300 MW. In the sense of a conservative estimate of the reduction potential, a maximum current emission factor of 300 mg/ | + | |
- | + | ||
- | (6) NOx emission factor (sulphite process) = (2 kg/t * 85 mg/Nm^3) / 300 mg/Nm^3 = 0.57 kg/t | + | |
- | + | ||
- | In the field of the sulphate process there are two plants > 50 MW with different boiler sizes in Germany. To calculate the reduction potential, the percentage distribution of the two plants per boiler size was calculated according to a combustion heat output in the range of 100-300 MW and more than 300 MW over all time series (2006 to 2018). For this purpose, the emission values of the individual years for the individual location or the individual plant are divided by the annual activity of both plants for each considered time series. The data basis for the calculation is the 2022 submission. This results in the estimates of the proportionate use of the various plant sizes for the past years up to 2018 with the plant-size-specific maximum emissions according to the daily mean value with 250 mg/ | + | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | (7) implied NOx emission factor (sulphate process) = 0.36 t/a * 250 mg/Nm^3 + 0.64 t/a * 200 mg/Nm^3 = 217.78 mg/Nm^3 | + | |
- | + | ||
- | The implied emission factor for the sulphate process will be taken over from the 2022 submission in 2020. The new emission factor results from the emission factor according to the current status and the maximum emission value proposed in the optional amendment of the 13< | + | |
- | + | ||
- | (8) implied NOx emission factor (sulphate process) = (1.75 kg/t * 85 mg/Nm^3) / 217.78 mg/Nm3 = 0.68 kg/t | + | |
- | + | ||
- | **NO< | + | |
- | + | ||
- | An optional amendment of the 13< | + | |
- | + | ||
- | For plants using raw petrol (naphtha), light heating oil or other petroleum products as fuel, the new maximum emission level corresponds to the limit value of 85 mg/ | + | |
- | + | ||
- | (9) implied NOx emission factor (refinery underfiring with light heating oil) = 85 mg/Nm^3 / 3.49 = 24.4 kg/TJ | + | |
- | + | ||
- | This results in NO< | + | |
- | + | ||
- | For a total of twelve plants with heavy fuel oil as fuel input the bell-rule is applied. First of all, the emission limit value according to the current 13< | + | |
- | + | ||
- | (10) percentage NOx emission reduction (refineries) = 1 - (85 mg/Nm^3 / 274.75 mg/Nm^3) = 0.69 | + | |
- | + | ||
- | A calculated reduction of approximate 69 per cent is assumed for the bell. The projected emission factors for the concerned source categories for 2025 to 2040 are now derived from the current emission factor of the source category under consideration from the 2022 submission minus the proportional reduction. | + | |
- | + | ||
- | The conversion is carried out in the same way for all source groups as shown in (11) for the refinery underfiring in LCP with light heating oil as fuel. | + | |
- | + | ||
- | (11) NOx emission (refinery underfiring with light heating oil) = [400 mg/Nm^3 * (1 - 0.69)] / 3.39 = 36.5 kg/TJ | + | |
- | + | ||
- | **NO< | + | |
- | + | ||
- | Emissions from other LCPs, which emerge from the energy balances, but cannot be clearly assigned to a specific fuel use or fuel mix and also show a reduction potential by an optional amendment of the 13< | + | |
- | + | ||
- | The NO< | + | |
__Table 13: Estimated relative and absolute plant split of LCP according to annual operating hours__ | __Table 13: Estimated relative and absolute plant split of LCP according to annual operating hours__ | ||
Line 105: | Line 51: | ||
| total | | | total | | ||
- | The emission factors will be recalculated for 2025 to 2040. First, the limit value of 85 mg/ | + | First, the limit value of 85 mg/ |
- | The calculation is shown using the example of the source category of electricity generation in large industrial | + | The calculation is shown using the example of the source category of electricity generation in large public |
- | (12) NOx emission factor (electricity generation in large industrial | + | (11) NOx emission factor (electricity generation in public |
- | **Increase | + | **Emission reduction |
- | The amendment of the Building Energy Act (Gebäudeenergiegesetz – GEG) of October 16<sup>th</ | + | Through |
- | The calculation | + | Through amendment |
- | __Table 14: Potential emission increases as a result | + | Considering these assumptions and the projected use of solid biomass in small combustion installations in the current WM scenario, a potential emission reduction of 0.8 kt PM< |
- | ^ year ^ NO< | + | |
- | ^ 2025 | +2.0 kt | + | |
- | ^ | + | |
- | Both the Building Energy Act (GEG) and the accompanying funding programme | + | Apart from that, an ambitious EU-wide regulation of PM emissions of small combustion installations will help a lot to comply with the PM< |
- | **Emission | + | **Additional |
- | Through amendment of the Commission regulation (EU) 2015/1189 with regard to ecodesign requirements for solid fuel boilers, it was assumed that requirements for placing on the market and putting into service solid biomass boilers regarding emissions of particulate matter will be set at 2,5 mg/ | + | For the emission projections submission 2025, in contrast |
- | + | ||
- | Through amendment of the Commission regulation (EU) 2015/1185 with regard to ecodesign requirements for solid fuel local space heaters, it was assumed that requirements for placing on the market and putting into service solid biomass local space heaters regarding emissions of particulate matter will be set at 20 mg/ | + | |
- | + | ||
- | Considering these assumptions | + | |
- | + | ||
- | **Reduction in agriculture through a bundle of measures quantified as an agricultural | + | |
- | + | ||
- | Despite compliance with the reduction obligation for ammonia | + | |
- | + | ||
- | * safety buffer | + | |
- | * safety buffer due to exceptions to various regulations for small and very small farms and | + | |
- | * compensation for the potentially increased ammonia | + | |
- | + | ||
- | For these reasons, three additional measures to reduce ammonia emissions | + | |
- | + | ||
- | //a) Increase | + | |
- | + | ||
- | //b) System-integrated | + | |
- | + | ||
- | //c) Increased application of liquid manure on tilled fields or grassland with injection, slot technology or acidification technology// \\ In 2030 25 % of the liquid manure currently applied on tilled fields or grassland with other technology was added to the proportion of liquid manure applied on tilled fields or grassland using injection or slot technology or acidification technology. This assumption probably requires further political implementation, | + | |
- | + | ||
- | The expected ammonia emission reduction of these three measures (in addition to the WM scenario) in 2030 is 3.4 kt (12.8 kt additional ammonia emissions due to more slurry digestion in biogas plants and 16.2 kt emission reduction due to the three additional mitigation measures of the WAM scenario). | + | |
- | + | ||
- | The main uncertainty in the quantification of the reduction potential lies in the achievement of the assumed degree of implementation in practice by 2030. With the regular update of the emission projections for air pollutants for reporting in accordance with Directive (EU) 2016/2284 by March 15< | + | |
In addition, the amount of ammonia emissions from the previous year will be checked annually in the future. This should be carried out for ammonia emissions from agriculture as part of the previous year's estimate of greenhouse gas emissions in accordance with Section 5 Paragraph 1 of the Federal Climate Protection Act. The previous year's estimate is based on current statistics on important activity data for the previous year (livestock, N-mineral fertiliser sales) and must be submitted annually by March 15< | In addition, the amount of ammonia emissions from the previous year will be checked annually in the future. This should be carried out for ammonia emissions from agriculture as part of the previous year's estimate of greenhouse gas emissions in accordance with Section 5 Paragraph 1 of the Federal Climate Protection Act. The previous year's estimate is based on current statistics on important activity data for the previous year (livestock, N-mineral fertiliser sales) and must be submitted annually by March 15< | ||
- | |||
- | **Emission reduction in road transport through a bundle of measures quantified as a road transport package:** | ||
- | |||
- | The road transport package contains two single measures and one bundle of measures. Because most of the measures are interdependent, | ||
- | |||
- | //a) introduction of Euro 7 standard// \\ In November 2022 the Commission published a proposal for a regulation “on type-approval of motor vehicles and engines and of systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles, with respect to their emissions and battery durability (Euro 7)”((https:// | ||
- | |||
- | //b) expansion of the truck toll system// \\ The basis for quantification is the coalition agreement of 2021. It provides that the weight limit should be lowered to 3,5t, introduction of a CO< | ||
- | |||
- | //c) package of measures to promote electromobility (among others to reach 15 million BEV in the passenger car fleet in 2030)// \\ The overarching goal of this bundle of measures is to reach 15 million BEV in the passenger car fleet in 2030 as the coalition agreement 2021 intended and as it was decided in the coalition committee on March 28< | ||
- | * Updating the CO< | ||
- | * Purchase bonus for electric cars and promotion of fleet conversion in the municipal and commercial sectors | ||
- | * Reduced taxation of electric company cars and other tax advantages | ||
- | * Development of a comprehensive, | ||
- | * Tender from the BMDV and the federal Autobahn GmbH for the “Deutschlandnetz” (fast charging infrastructure at at least 1,000 locations) | ||
- | * Implementation of the federal government' | ||
- | For other vehicle categories the share of electric vehicles is assumed to increase through: \\ | ||
- | * New CO< | ||
- | * Continuation of the promotion of light and heavy duty vehicles with alternative drives as well as the promotion of the development of the associated supply infrastructure for the fleet electrification | ||
- | * Implementation of the Clean Vehicles Directive (CVD) (EU) 2019/1161 | ||
- | * Continuation of the funding for zero-emission buses | ||
- | |||
- | The impact of all these interdependent measures is assumed as follows: | ||
- | * The share of new registered BEV per year exceeds 50 % in 2024 and reaches 88 % in 2030 for passenger cars. The share of electric mileage in total mileage increases to 38 % in 2030. 15 million BEV will be part of the passenger car fleet in 2030. | ||
- | * From 2034 for passenger cars and from 2035 for LDV it is assumed, that only electrical cars will be newly registered. However, it is conceivable that vehicles with combustion engines using synthetic or biogenic fuels will continue to be newly registered. | ||
- | * The overall particle emissions from road transport are assumed to slightly decrease until 2030, because of the lower exhaust emissions (due to increase in electric mileage as well as Euro 7, despite an overall increasing mileage) and the lower emissions from abrasion (due to lower brake wear of BEV, despite higher emissions from tyre wear and road abrasion at the same time, and new emissions standards with Euro 7). | ||
- | |||
- | The emission reduction potential of the WAM road transport package in 2025 and 2030 compared to the WM scenario is given in the table below. | ||
- | |||
- | __Table 15: Potential emission reductions of the road transport package compared to the WM scenario__ | ||
- | ^ year ^ NO< | ||
- | ^ 2025 | -3.7 kt | -0.1 kt | -2.4 kt | -0.7 kt | -0.2 kt | | ||
- | ^ 2030 | -28.6 kt | -0.2 kt | -10.3 kt | -2.6 kt | -1.2 kt | | ||
- | |||
- |