meta data for this page
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
general:projections:wam-scenario [2025/04/01 14:26] – eisold | general:projections:wam-scenario [2025/04/04 12:51] (current) – eisold | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=== Additional measures that have not yet been implemented are assigned to the WAM scenario=== | === Additional measures that have not yet been implemented are assigned to the WAM scenario=== | ||
- | {{ : | ||
+ | **Optional amendment of the 13< | ||
- | }} | + | The German Federal Government declared in its current NAPCP 2023, that an optional amendment of the 13< |
- | **NO< | + | |
- | According to the existing 13< | + | * **potential |
- | It is assumed for the sulphite process that all four plants > 50 MW located in Germany are operated with RTI of 50-300 MW. In the sense of a conservative estimate of the reduction potential, a maximum current emission factor of 300 mg/ | + | According |
- | (6) NOx emission factor | + | It is assumed for the sulfite process that all plants located in Germany are operated with an RTI of 50-300 MW. A maximum |
- | In the field of the sulphate process there are two plants > 50 MW with different boiler sizes in Germany. To calculate the reduction potential, the percentage distribution of the two plants per boiler size was calculated according to a combustion heat output in the range of 100-300 MW and more than 300 MW over all time series | + | |
+ | In the field of the sulfate process (also known as kraft process) a weighted maximum average emission factor according to the limit values of the 13< | ||
- | (7) implied NOx emission factor (sulphate | + | (6) implied NOx emission factor (sulfate |
- | The implied emission factor for the sulphate process | + | The implied emission factor for the sulphate process |
- | (8) implied NOx emission factor (sulphate | + | (7) implied NOx emission factor (sulfate |
- | **NO< | + | |
- | An optional amendment of the 13< | + | An optional amendment of the 13< |
- | For plants | + | For plants |
- | (9) implied NOx emission factor (refinery underfiring with light heating oil) = 85 mg/Nm^3 / 3.49 = 24.4 kg/TJ | + | (8) implied NOx emission factor (refinery underfiring with light heating oil) = 85 mg/Nm³ / 3.49 = 24.4 kg/TJ |
- | This results in NO< | + | This results in future |
- | For a total of twelve | + | For all plants |
- | (10) percentage NOx emission reduction (refineries) = 1 - (85 mg/Nm^3 / 274.75 mg/Nm^3) = 0.69 | + | (9) percentage NOx emission reduction (specific refinery) = 1 - (189.75 |
- | A calculated | + | This exemplary relative |
- | The conversion is carried out in the same way for all source groups as shown in (11) for the refinery underfiring | + | |
- | | + | * **potential NO< |
- | **NO< | + | Emissions from other LCPs, which emerge from the energy balances and cannot be clearly assigned to a specific fuel use or fuel mix, but also show a reduction potential by an optional amendment of the 13< |
- | Emissions from other LCPs, which emerge from the energy balances, but cannot be clearly assigned to a specific fuel use or fuel mix and also show a reduction potential by an optional amendment of the 13< | + | The NO< |
- | + | ||
- | The NO< | + | |
__Table 13: Estimated relative and absolute plant split of LCP according to annual operating hours__ | __Table 13: Estimated relative and absolute plant split of LCP according to annual operating hours__ | ||
Line 53: | Line 51: | ||
| total | | | total | | ||
- | The emission factors will be recalculated for 2025 to 2040. First, the limit value of 85 mg/ | + | First, the limit value of 85 mg/ |
- | The calculation is shown using the example of the source category of electricity generation in large industrial | + | The calculation is shown using the example of the source category of electricity generation in large public |
- | (12) NOx emission factor (electricity generation in large industrial | + | (11) NOx emission factor (electricity generation in public |
- | **Increase | + | **Emission reduction |
- | The amendment of the Building Energy Act (Gebäudeenergiegesetz – GEG) of October 16<sup>th</ | + | Through |
- | The calculation | + | Through amendment |
- | __Table 14: Potential emission increases as a result | + | Considering these assumptions and the projected use of solid biomass in small combustion installations in the current WM scenario, a potential emission reduction of 0.8 kt PM< |
- | ^ year ^ NO< | + | |
- | ^ 2025 | +2.0 kt | + | |
- | ^ | + | |
- | Both the Building Energy Act (GEG) and the accompanying funding programme | + | Apart from that, an ambitious EU-wide regulation of PM emissions of small combustion installations will help a lot to comply with the PM< |
- | **Emission | + | **Additional |
- | Through amendment of the Commission regulation (EU) 2015/1189 with regard to ecodesign requirements for solid fuel boilers, it was assumed that requirements for placing on the market and putting into service solid biomass boilers regarding emissions of particulate matter will be set at 2,5 mg/ | + | For the emission projections submission 2025, in contrast |
- | + | ||
- | Through amendment of the Commission regulation (EU) 2015/1185 with regard to ecodesign requirements for solid fuel local space heaters, it was assumed that requirements for placing on the market and putting into service solid biomass local space heaters regarding emissions of particulate matter will be set at 20 mg/ | + | |
- | + | ||
- | Considering these assumptions | + | |
- | + | ||
- | **Reduction in agriculture through a bundle of measures quantified as an agricultural | + | |
- | + | ||
- | Despite compliance with the reduction obligation for ammonia | + | |
- | + | ||
- | * safety buffer | + | |
- | * safety buffer due to exceptions to various regulations for small and very small farms and | + | |
- | * compensation for the potentially increased ammonia | + | |
- | + | ||
- | For these reasons, three additional measures to reduce ammonia emissions | + | |
- | + | ||
- | //a) Increase | + | |
- | + | ||
- | //b) System-integrated | + | |
- | + | ||
- | //c) Increased application of liquid manure on tilled fields or grassland with injection, slot technology or acidification technology// \\ In 2030 25 % of the liquid manure currently applied on tilled fields or grassland with other technology was added to the proportion of liquid manure applied on tilled fields or grassland using injection or slot technology or acidification technology. This assumption probably requires further political implementation, | + | |
- | + | ||
- | The expected ammonia emission reduction of these three measures (in addition to the WM scenario) in 2030 is 3.4 kt (12.8 kt additional ammonia emissions due to more slurry digestion in biogas plants and 16.2 kt emission reduction due to the three additional mitigation measures of the WAM scenario). | + | |
- | + | ||
- | The main uncertainty in the quantification of the reduction potential lies in the achievement of the assumed degree of implementation in practice by 2030. With the regular update of the emission projections for air pollutants for reporting in accordance with Directive (EU) 2016/2284 by March 15< | + | |
In addition, the amount of ammonia emissions from the previous year will be checked annually in the future. This should be carried out for ammonia emissions from agriculture as part of the previous year's estimate of greenhouse gas emissions in accordance with Section 5 Paragraph 1 of the Federal Climate Protection Act. The previous year's estimate is based on current statistics on important activity data for the previous year (livestock, N-mineral fertiliser sales) and must be submitted annually by March 15< | In addition, the amount of ammonia emissions from the previous year will be checked annually in the future. This should be carried out for ammonia emissions from agriculture as part of the previous year's estimate of greenhouse gas emissions in accordance with Section 5 Paragraph 1 of the Federal Climate Protection Act. The previous year's estimate is based on current statistics on important activity data for the previous year (livestock, N-mineral fertiliser sales) and must be submitted annually by March 15< | ||
- | |||
- | **Emission reduction in road transport through a bundle of measures quantified as a road transport package:** | ||
- | |||
- | The road transport package contains two single measures and one bundle of measures. Because most of the measures are interdependent, | ||
- | |||
- | //a) introduction of Euro 7 standard// \\ In November 2022 the Commission published a proposal for a regulation “on type-approval of motor vehicles and engines and of systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles, with respect to their emissions and battery durability (Euro 7)”((https:// | ||
- | |||
- | //b) expansion of the truck toll system// \\ The basis for quantification is the coalition agreement of 2021. It provides that the weight limit should be lowered to 3,5t, introduction of a CO< | ||
- | |||
- | //c) package of measures to promote electromobility (among others to reach 15 million BEV in the passenger car fleet in 2030)// \\ The overarching goal of this bundle of measures is to reach 15 million BEV in the passenger car fleet in 2030 as the coalition agreement 2021 intended and as it was decided in the coalition committee on March 28< | ||
- | * Updating the CO< | ||
- | * Purchase bonus for electric cars and promotion of fleet conversion in the municipal and commercial sectors | ||
- | * Reduced taxation of electric company cars and other tax advantages | ||
- | * Development of a comprehensive, | ||
- | * Tender from the BMDV and the federal Autobahn GmbH for the “Deutschlandnetz” (fast charging infrastructure at at least 1,000 locations) | ||
- | * Implementation of the federal government' | ||
- | For other vehicle categories the share of electric vehicles is assumed to increase through: \\ | ||
- | * New CO< | ||
- | * Continuation of the promotion of light and heavy duty vehicles with alternative drives as well as the promotion of the development of the associated supply infrastructure for the fleet electrification | ||
- | * Implementation of the Clean Vehicles Directive (CVD) (EU) 2019/1161 | ||
- | * Continuation of the funding for zero-emission buses | ||
- | |||
- | The impact of all these interdependent measures is assumed as follows: | ||
- | * The share of new registered BEV per year exceeds 50 % in 2024 and reaches 88 % in 2030 for passenger cars. The share of electric mileage in total mileage increases to 38 % in 2030. 15 million BEV will be part of the passenger car fleet in 2030. | ||
- | * From 2034 for passenger cars and from 2035 for LDV it is assumed, that only electrical cars will be newly registered. However, it is conceivable that vehicles with combustion engines using synthetic or biogenic fuels will continue to be newly registered. | ||
- | * The overall particle emissions from road transport are assumed to slightly decrease until 2030, because of the lower exhaust emissions (due to increase in electric mileage as well as Euro 7, despite an overall increasing mileage) and the lower emissions from abrasion (due to lower brake wear of BEV, despite higher emissions from tyre wear and road abrasion at the same time, and new emissions standards with Euro 7). | ||
- | |||
- | The emission reduction potential of the WAM road transport package in 2025 and 2030 compared to the WM scenario is given in the table below. | ||
- | |||
- | __Table 15: Potential emission reductions of the road transport package compared to the WM scenario__ | ||
- | ^ year ^ NO< | ||
- | ^ 2025 | -3.7 kt | -0.1 kt | -2.4 kt | -0.7 kt | -0.2 kt | | ||
- | ^ 2030 | -28.6 kt | -0.2 kt | -10.3 kt | -2.6 kt | -1.2 kt | | ||
- | |||
- |