meta data for this page
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
general:projections:wam-scenario [2025/04/01 14:34] – eisold | general:projections:wam-scenario [2025/04/04 12:51] (current) – eisold | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=== Additional measures that have not yet been implemented are assigned to the WAM scenario=== | === Additional measures that have not yet been implemented are assigned to the WAM scenario=== | ||
- | {{ : | ||
+ | **Optional amendment of the 13< | ||
- | }} | + | The German Federal Government declared in its current NAPCP 2023, that an optional amendment of the 13< |
- | **NO< | + | |
- | According to the existing 13< | + | * **potential |
- | It is assumed for the sulphite process that all four plants > 50 MW located in Germany are operated with RTI of 50-300 MW. In the sense of a conservative estimate of the reduction potential, a maximum current emission factor of 300 mg/ | + | According |
- | (6) NOx emission factor | + | It is assumed for the sulfite process that all plants located in Germany are operated with an RTI of 50-300 MW. A maximum |
- | In the field of the sulphate process there are two plants > 50 MW with different boiler sizes in Germany. To calculate the reduction potential, the percentage distribution of the two plants per boiler size was calculated according to a combustion heat output in the range of 100-300 MW and more than 300 MW over all time series | + | |
+ | In the field of the sulfate process (also known as kraft process) a weighted maximum average emission factor according to the limit values of the 13< | ||
- | (7) implied NOx emission factor (sulphate | + | (6) implied NOx emission factor (sulfate |
- | The implied emission factor for the sulphate process | + | The implied emission factor for the sulphate process |
- | (8) implied NOx emission factor (sulphate | + | (7) implied NOx emission factor (sulfate |
- | **NO< | + | |
- | An optional amendment of the 13< | + | An optional amendment of the 13< |
- | For plants | + | For plants |
- | (9) implied NOx emission factor (refinery underfiring with light heating oil) = 85 mg/Nm^3 / 3.49 = 24.4 kg/TJ | + | (8) implied NOx emission factor (refinery underfiring with light heating oil) = 85 mg/Nm³ / 3.49 = 24.4 kg/TJ |
- | This results in NO< | + | This results in future |
- | For a total of twelve | + | For all plants |
- | (10) percentage NOx emission reduction (refineries) = 1 - (85 mg/Nm^3 / 274.75 mg/Nm^3) = 0.69 | + | (9) percentage NOx emission reduction (specific refinery) = 1 - (189.75 |
- | A calculated | + | This exemplary relative |
- | The conversion is carried out in the same way for all source groups as shown in (11) for the refinery underfiring | + | |
- | | + | * **potential NO< |
- | **NO< | + | Emissions from other LCPs, which emerge from the energy balances and cannot be clearly assigned to a specific fuel use or fuel mix, but also show a reduction potential by an optional amendment of the 13< |
- | Emissions from other LCPs, which emerge from the energy balances, but cannot be clearly assigned to a specific fuel use or fuel mix and also show a reduction potential by an optional amendment of the 13< | + | The NO< |
- | + | ||
- | The NO< | + | |
__Table 13: Estimated relative and absolute plant split of LCP according to annual operating hours__ | __Table 13: Estimated relative and absolute plant split of LCP according to annual operating hours__ | ||
Line 53: | Line 51: | ||
| total | | | total | | ||
- | The emission factors will be recalculated for 2025 to 2040. First, the limit value of 85 mg/ | + | First, the limit value of 85 mg/ |
+ | |||
+ | The calculation is shown using the example of the source category of electricity generation in large public power plants using heavy fuel oil (reference value in 2022: 43.5 kg/TJ) in (11), whereby the procedure is analogous for all other source categories. | ||
- | The calculation is shown using the example of the source category of electricity generation in large industrial | + | (11) NOx emission factor (electricity generation in public |
- | (12) NOx emission | + | **Emission reduction in small combustion installations by amending the emission |
- | **Emission reduction in small combustion installations by tightening the emission limits | + | Through amendment |
- | Through amendment of the Commission regulation (EU) 2015/1189 with regard to ecodesign requirements for solid fuel boilers, it was assumed that requirements for placing on the market and putting into service solid biomass | + | Through amendment of the Commission regulation (EU) 2015/1185 with regard to ecodesign requirements for solid fuel local space heaters, it was assumed that requirements for placing on the market and putting into service solid biomass |
- | Through amendment of the Commission regulation (EU) 2015/1185 with regard to ecodesign requirements for solid fuel local space heaters, it was assumed that requirements for placing on the market and putting into service | + | Considering these assumptions and the projected use of solid biomass |
- | Considering these assumptions as well as the potentially increased biomass use described above, a potential emission reduction | + | Apart from that, an ambitious EU-wide regulation |
**Additional reduction in agriculture compared to the German NAPCP 2023:** | **Additional reduction in agriculture compared to the German NAPCP 2023:** | ||
- | For the emission projections submission 2025, in contrast to the emission projections submission 2023 as well as to the German NAPCP 2023, no further mitigation potential has been reported in the current WAM scenario regarding additional measures in the agricultural sector (NFR 3). The support measure to increase the co-fermentation of slurry in biogas production to further reduce GHG emissions of the agricultural sector has been stopped in 2024, and currently there is no other concrete measure under preparation. In addition, the support measure was not very effective due to low adoption rates in the first years until 2024. Therefore, no increase in co-digested slurry is expected above the assumptions in the WM scenario until 2030, and thus no increase of NH< | + | For the emission projections submission 2025, in contrast to the emission projections submission 2023 as well as to the German NAPCP 2023, no further mitigation potential has been reported in the current WAM scenario regarding additional measures in the agricultural sector (NFR 3). The support measure to increase the co-fermentation of slurry in biogas production to further reduce GHG emissions of the agricultural sector has been stopped in 2024, and currently there is no other concrete measure under preparation. In addition, the support measure was not very effective due to low adoption rates in the first years until 2024. Therefore, no increase in co-digested slurry is expected above the assumptions in the WM scenario until 2030, and thus no increase of NH< |
In addition, the amount of ammonia emissions from the previous year will be checked annually in the future. This should be carried out for ammonia emissions from agriculture as part of the previous year's estimate of greenhouse gas emissions in accordance with Section 5 Paragraph 1 of the Federal Climate Protection Act. The previous year's estimate is based on current statistics on important activity data for the previous year (livestock, N-mineral fertiliser sales) and must be submitted annually by March 15< | In addition, the amount of ammonia emissions from the previous year will be checked annually in the future. This should be carried out for ammonia emissions from agriculture as part of the previous year's estimate of greenhouse gas emissions in accordance with Section 5 Paragraph 1 of the Federal Climate Protection Act. The previous year's estimate is based on current statistics on important activity data for the previous year (livestock, N-mineral fertiliser sales) and must be submitted annually by March 15< |