meta data for this page
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| general:projections:wam-scenario [2025/04/03 22:19] – eisold | general:projections:wam-scenario [2025/04/04 12:51] (current) – eisold | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| === Additional measures that have not yet been implemented are assigned to the WAM scenario=== | === Additional measures that have not yet been implemented are assigned to the WAM scenario=== | ||
| - | {{ : | ||
| - | |||
| - | }} | ||
| **Optional amendment of the 13< | **Optional amendment of the 13< | ||
| - | The German Federal Government declared in its current NAPCP 2023, that an optional amendment of the 13< | + | The German Federal Government declared in its current NAPCP 2023, that an optional amendment of the 13< |
| * **potential NO< | * **potential NO< | ||
| Line 12: | Line 9: | ||
| According to the existing 13< | According to the existing 13< | ||
| - | It is assumed for the sulphite | + | It is assumed for the sulfite |
| - | (5) implied | + | (5) implied |
| In the field of the sulfate process (also known as kraft process) a weighted maximum average emission factor according to the limit values of the 13< | In the field of the sulfate process (also known as kraft process) a weighted maximum average emission factor according to the limit values of the 13< | ||
| - | (6) implied | + | (6) implied |
| - | The implied emission factor for the sulphate process | + | The implied emission factor for the sulphate process |
| - | (8) implied | + | (7) implied |
| - | **potential NO< | + | * **potential NO< |
| - | An optional amendment of the 13< | + | An optional amendment of the 13< |
| - | For plants | + | For plants |
| - | (9) implied NOx emission factor (refinery underfiring with light heating oil) = 85 mg/Nm^3 / 3.49 = 24.4 kg/TJ | + | (8) implied NOx emission factor (refinery underfiring with light heating oil) = 85 mg/Nm³ / 3.49 = 24.4 kg/TJ |
| - | This results in NO< | + | This results in future |
| - | For a total of twelve | + | For all plants |
| - | (10) percentage NOx emission reduction (refineries) = 1 - (85 mg/Nm^3 / 274.75 mg/Nm^3) = 0.69 | + | (9) percentage NOx emission reduction (specific refinery) = 1 - (189.75 |
| - | A calculated | + | This exemplary relative |
| - | The conversion is carried out in the same way for all source groups as shown in (11) for the refinery underfiring | + | |
| - | | + | * **potential NO< |
| - | **NO< | + | Emissions from other LCPs, which emerge from the energy balances and cannot be clearly assigned to a specific fuel use or fuel mix, but also show a reduction potential by an optional amendment of the 13< |
| - | Emissions from other LCPs, which emerge from the energy balances, but cannot be clearly assigned to a specific fuel use or fuel mix and also show a reduction potential by an optional amendment of the 13< | + | The NO< |
| - | + | ||
| - | The NO< | + | |
| __Table 13: Estimated relative and absolute plant split of LCP according to annual operating hours__ | __Table 13: Estimated relative and absolute plant split of LCP according to annual operating hours__ | ||
| Line 56: | Line 51: | ||
| | total | | | total | | ||
| - | The emission factors will be recalculated for 2025 to 2040. First, the limit value of 85 mg/ | + | First, the limit value of 85 mg/ |
| + | |||
| + | The calculation is shown using the example of the source category of electricity generation in large public power plants using heavy fuel oil (reference value in 2022: 43.5 kg/TJ) in (11), whereby the procedure is analogous for all other source categories. | ||
| - | The calculation is shown using the example of the source category of electricity generation in large industrial | + | (11) NOx emission factor (electricity generation in public |
| - | (12) NOx emission | + | **Emission reduction in small combustion installations by amending the emission |
| - | **Emission reduction in small combustion installations by tightening the emission limits | + | Through amendment |
| - | Through amendment of the Commission regulation (EU) 2015/1189 with regard to ecodesign requirements for solid fuel boilers, it was assumed that requirements for placing on the market and putting into service solid biomass | + | Through amendment of the Commission regulation (EU) 2015/1185 with regard to ecodesign requirements for solid fuel local space heaters, it was assumed that requirements for placing on the market and putting into service solid biomass |
| - | Through amendment of the Commission regulation (EU) 2015/1185 with regard to ecodesign requirements for solid fuel local space heaters, it was assumed that requirements for placing on the market and putting into service | + | Considering these assumptions and the projected use of solid biomass |
| - | Considering these assumptions as well as the potentially increased biomass use described above, a potential emission reduction | + | Apart from that, an ambitious EU-wide regulation |
| **Additional reduction in agriculture compared to the German NAPCP 2023:** | **Additional reduction in agriculture compared to the German NAPCP 2023:** | ||