meta data for this page
  •  

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
general:quality_verification:start [2025/04/11 08:58] – schillergeneral:quality_verification:start [2025/04/16 08:31] (current) – kotzulla
Line 3: Line 3:
 {{  :general:quality_verification:qaqc1.png?nolink&400}} {{  :general:quality_verification:qaqc1.png?nolink&400}}
  
-===== The Quality System for Emission Inventories and it´s contribution to UNECE-CLRTAP reporting =====+===== The Quality System for Emission Inventories and it´s contribution to UNECE/CLRTAP reporting =====
  
-The German Quality System for Emission Inventories (QSE) originally was designed to serve the purposes of emission reporting under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). It takes account of provisions of the **2006 IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) Guidelines - General Guidance and Reporting (GGR)**, of national circumstances in Germany and of the internal structures and procedures of the German Environment Agency (UBA), the reporting institution.+The German Quality System for Emission Inventories (QSE) originally was designed to serve the purposes of emission reporting under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).  
 + 
 +It takes account of provisions of the **2006 IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) Guidelines, Volume 1, Chapter 6: General Guidance and Reporting (GGR)** [(IPCC2006)], of national circumstances in Germany and of the internal structures and procedures of the German Environment Agency (UBA), the reporting institution.
  
 Thus it can be assumed that by adopting the IPCC Guidelines, the UNECE/CLRTAP seriously facilitated the task of developing a QC/QA system for the reporting of air pollutants. It is likely that all QSE procedures are flexible enough to be able to routinely incorporate these demands in the future as well. Thus it can be assumed that by adopting the IPCC Guidelines, the UNECE/CLRTAP seriously facilitated the task of developing a QC/QA system for the reporting of air pollutants. It is likely that all QSE procedures are flexible enough to be able to routinely incorporate these demands in the future as well.
Line 12: Line 14:
 The QSE is designed to cover all participants of the National System on Emissions (NaSE) which are mostly identical to those responsible for the reporting of air pollutants.  The QSE is designed to cover all participants of the National System on Emissions (NaSE) which are mostly identical to those responsible for the reporting of air pollutants. 
  
-Within the German Federal Environment Agency (UBA), the appliance of the QSE and its procedures has been made mandatory for UNFCCC reporting by an internal directive (UBA-Hausanordnung 11/2005). The adoption of the QSE´s approach will be useful for CLRTAP-reporting too but its implications have to be considered carefully (mostly due to human resources), which is why the appliance of QSE procedures is partly outstanding. Currently few parts are used for reporting under CLRTAP, (see below, “Current State”).+Within the German Federal Environment Agency (UBA), the appliance of the QSE and its procedures has been made mandatory for UNFCCC reporting by an internal directive (UBA-Hausanordnung 11/2005). The adoption of the QSE´s approach will be useful for CLRTAP reporting too but its implications have to be considered carefully (mostly due to human resources), which is why the appliance of QSE procedures is partly outstanding. Currently few parts are used for reporting under CLRTAP, (see below, “Current State”).
  
-The requirements pertaining to a system for quality control and quality assurance (QC/QA system) and to measures for quality control and quality assurance are defined primarily by Chapter 6 of the 2006 IPCC GL GGR.+The requirements pertaining to a system for quality control and quality assurance (QC/QA system) and to measures for quality control and quality assurance are defined primarily by Chapter 6 of the 2006 IPCC GL, Volume 1: GGR [(IPCC2006)].
  
 From those provisions, the German Environment Agency derived **"General requirements pertaining to quality control and quality assurance in connection with greenhouse-gas-emissions reporting"**. It is assumed that these requirements completely apply for CLRTAP reporting, too. Therefore, they are briefly given in the following to depict the necessary though partly outstanding trail of action for the development of a consistent QC/QA system under UNECE/CLRTAP. From those provisions, the German Environment Agency derived **"General requirements pertaining to quality control and quality assurance in connection with greenhouse-gas-emissions reporting"**. It is assumed that these requirements completely apply for CLRTAP reporting, too. Therefore, they are briefly given in the following to depict the necessary though partly outstanding trail of action for the development of a consistent QC/QA system under UNECE/CLRTAP.
  
 ===== Main demands ===== ===== Main demands =====
 +
 The 2006 IPCC Guidelines require that QC/QA systems be introduced with the aim of enhancing transparency, consistency, comparability, completeness, accuracy and timeliness and, especially, that such inventories fulfill requirements pertaining to "good inventory practice".  The 2006 IPCC Guidelines require that QC/QA systems be introduced with the aim of enhancing transparency, consistency, comparability, completeness, accuracy and timeliness and, especially, that such inventories fulfill requirements pertaining to "good inventory practice". 
  
Line 37: Line 40:
  
 The German Single National Entity is established in the German Environment Agency (Umweltbundesamt - UBA). In executing its function, it is good practice to establish the position of a coordinator for the Quality System to be developed. A QC/QA coordinator has responsibility for ensuring that a relevant QC/QA system is developed and implemented. Such implementation should be suitably institutionalised – for example by means of an in-house directive or association agreements. The German Single National Entity is established in the German Environment Agency (Umweltbundesamt - UBA). In executing its function, it is good practice to establish the position of a coordinator for the Quality System to be developed. A QC/QA coordinator has responsibility for ensuring that a relevant QC/QA system is developed and implemented. Such implementation should be suitably institutionalised – for example by means of an in-house directive or association agreements.
 +
 ==== QC/QA plan ==== ==== QC/QA plan ====
-The purpose of a QC/QA plan is to ensure that QC/QA measures are properly organised and executed. It includes a description of all required QC/QA measures and a schedule for implementation of such measures. It also defines the primary emphasis of such measures.\\+ 
 +The purpose of a QC/QA plan is to ensure that QC/QA measures are properly organised and executed. It includes a description of all required QC/QA measures and a schedule for implementation of such measures. It also defines the primary emphasis of such measures. 
 Good practice calls for establishing a QC/QA plan and then reviewing and updating it each year after the latest inventory has been prepared. Good practice calls for establishing a QC/QA plan and then reviewing and updating it each year after the latest inventory has been prepared.
 On the basis of the results of annual inventory review, the results of QC/QA measures and other informations of which it is aware, the Single National Entity aims to prepare an improvement plan for the entire inventory. On this basis, in turn, it will then derive proposals for a binding inventory plan for the next year to be reported. On the basis of the results of annual inventory review, the results of QC/QA measures and other informations of which it is aware, the Single National Entity aims to prepare an improvement plan for the entire inventory. On this basis, in turn, it will then derive proposals for a binding inventory plan for the next year to be reported.
  
 ==== General quality control ==== ==== General quality control ====
-Pursuant to the definition used by the 2006 IPCC GL (Chapter 6.1 GGR), quality control (QC) comprises a system of routine specialised measures for measuring and checking the quality of inventories in preparation.\\ + 
-Requirements pertaining to general (formerly so called Tier-1) QC procedures can be derived from the requirements mentioned in Chapter 6.6, especially Table 6.1 which includes a complete list of general QC measures.\\+Pursuant to the definition used by the 2006 IPCC GL (Volume 1: Chapter 6.1)[(IPCC2006)], quality control (QC) comprises a system of routine specialised measures for measuring and checking the quality of inventories in preparation. 
 + 
 +Requirements pertaining to general (formerly so called Tier-1) QC procedures can be derived from the requirements mentioned in Chapter 6.6, especially Table 6.1 which includes a complete list of general QC measures. 
 Required quality controls and their results should be recorded and not all quality controls have to be carried out on an annual basis. It should be ensured that all source categories undergo detailed quality control at least periodically. Required quality controls and their results should be recorded and not all quality controls have to be carried out on an annual basis. It should be ensured that all source categories undergo detailed quality control at least periodically.
  
 ==== Source-category-specific quality control ==== ==== Source-category-specific quality control ====
  
-In addition to undergoing general procedures, particularly relevant source categories (such as key sources), available resources presupposed, should undergo category specific (formerly so called Tier 2) quality control with regard to determination of activity data, emissions and uncertainties (cf. Chapter 6.7; GGR). +In addition to undergoing general procedures, particularly relevant source categories (such as key sources), available resources presupposed, should undergo category specific (formerly so called Tier2) quality control with regard to determination of activity data, emissions and uncertainties (cf. Chapter 6.7; GGR). 
  
-The chapters of the 2006 IPCC GL that pertain to the various individual source categories (Vol 2-5) include additional information relative to source-category-specific QC measures. Such guidelines should be considered in preparation of a QC/QA plan.+The chapters of the 2006 IPCC GL that pertain to the various individual source categories (Volumes 2 to 5) include additional information relative to source-category-specific QC measures. Such guidelines should be considered in preparation of a QC/QA plan.
  
 ==== Quality assurance procedures ==== ==== Quality assurance procedures ====
Line 63: Line 72:
 ==== Verification activities ==== ==== Verification activities ====
  
-According to the **GGR-Chapter 6.10** "verification activities" refer to emission estimates only. +According to the **Chapter 6.10** of Volume 1 - General Guidance and Reporting of the 2006 IPCC Guidelines, "verification activities" refer to emission estimates only. 
  
 Verification activities for emission factors and activity data are subsumed under the headword and chapter "quality control", which is a somewhat confusing approach. Nevertheless, and by leaving this peculiarity aside, verification, next to QC, is undoubtedly one key to ensure confidence and reliability of the estimates, corresponding emission factors and activity data. Verification activities for emission factors and activity data are subsumed under the headword and chapter "quality control", which is a somewhat confusing approach. Nevertheless, and by leaving this peculiarity aside, verification, next to QC, is undoubtedly one key to ensure confidence and reliability of the estimates, corresponding emission factors and activity data.
Line 88: Line 97:
  
 ===== Current state ===== ===== Current state =====
 +
 Information regarding the UBA's current organisational measures for implementing the requirements given above is provided in the following. Information regarding the UBA's current organisational measures for implementing the requirements given above is provided in the following.
  
Line 94: Line 104:
 Within the QSE framework, a concept was developed that defines binding responsibilities inside the German Environment Agency for the implementation of the necessary QC and QA measures. Within the QSE framework, a concept was developed that defines binding responsibilities inside the German Environment Agency for the implementation of the necessary QC and QA measures.
  
-The purpose of defining roles and responsibilities is to facilitate the effective information exchange and the directive-conformal execution of QC and QA. The following roles are also used for reporting under CLRTAP (but are not yet established on a mandatory basis).+The purpose of defining roles and responsibilities is to facilitate the effective information exchange and the directive-conformal execution of QC and QA.  
 + 
 +The following roles are also used for reporting under CLRTAP but not yet on the same mandatory basis as established for GHG reporting.
  
 <WRAP center round info 60%> <WRAP center round info 60%>
Line 134: Line 146:
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
  
 +<WRAP center round info 60%> 
 +**QSE co-ordinator (QSEK)**\\ 
 +  * member of the Single National Entity 
 +  * tasks: co-ordination of entire QSE and QA/QC activities; provision of QSE checklists. 
 +</WRAP>
 ==== Current workflow management ==== ==== Current workflow management ====
  
-The workflow specified by the QSE is currently also used for activity data and additionally for emission factors in the agriculture sector (but not yet established on a mandatory basis). +The workflow specified by the QSE is also applied for activity data and, additionally, emission factors for NFR 3 - Agriculture. However, in contrast to UNFCCC GHG reporting, no administrative agreement with the data-providing institution is in place yet. 
 + 
 +Moreover, these parts of the adopted design are altered to serve the purposes of UNECE/CLRTAP reporting in the present state. For example, FVs are currently responsible for compiling, entry (into the CSE data base) and, if necessary, the calculating of activity data but, in contrast to GHG reporting under UNFCCC, not for compiling of emission factors. 
 + 
 +{{  :general:quality_verification:qaqc-roles_workflow.png?700  }}
  
-Moreover, these parts of the adopted design are altered to serve the purposes of CLRTAP-reporting in the present state. For example, FV are currently responsible for compiling, entry (into the CSE data base) and,if necessary, the calculating of activity data but, in contrast to GHG reporting under UNFCCC, mostly not for compiling of emission factors. 
-{{  :general:quality_verification:grafik_qcqa_roles-responsibilities.png?700  }} 
 Figure: QSE – Roles, responsibilities and workflow Figure: QSE – Roles, responsibilities and workflow
  
 ==== General and category-specific quality control (QC) ==== ==== General and category-specific quality control (QC) ====
  
-As all activity data (except for the handling of bulk products) are also applied for UNFCCC-Reporting, the same general and category-specific quality control of the QSE is already in force for activity data within the UNECE reporting. +As all activity data (except for the handling of bulk products) are also applied for UNFCCC GHG reporting, the same general and category-specific quality control of the QSE is already in force for activity data within the UNECE/CLRTAP reporting.  
 + 
 +The quality of these activity data is supervised by the appliance of QC checks via special QSE checklists mandatory for all partcipants. The QSE checklists cover the set of general QC measures given in Table 6.1 of the 2006 IPCC GL GGR plus additional category-specific measures for key-category-specific quality control.
  
-The quality of these activity data is supervised by the appliance of QC checks via special QSE checklists mandatory for all partcipants. The QSE checklists cover the set of general QC measures given in Table 6.1 of the 2006 IPCC GL GGR plus additional category-specific measures for key-category-specific quality control.\\ 
  
 The QSE checklists are to be filled in annually throughout the whole inventory regardles whether or not a specific NFR category is a key source for emissions and by FV, FAP, and QKV consecutively. The QSE checklists are to be filled in annually throughout the whole inventory regardles whether or not a specific NFR category is a key source for emissions and by FV, FAP, and QKV consecutively.
Line 163: Line 182:
 More intense peer reviews are undertaken whenever necessary and are performed by national experts and, in most cases, conducted by means of a national workshop. More intense peer reviews are undertaken whenever necessary and are performed by national experts and, in most cases, conducted by means of a national workshop.
  
-As mentioned above, as all activity data (except for the handling of bulk products) are also applied for UNFCCC-Reporting, the same QA procedures are already in force for activity data within the UNECE reporting.+As mentioned above, as all activity data (except for the handling of bulk products) are also applied for UNFCCC reporting, the same QA procedures are already in force for activity data within the UNECE reporting. 
 + 
 + 
 + 
 +[(IPCC2006> IPCC (2006): 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Volume 1, General Guidance and Reporting: Chapter 6 - Quality Assurance/Qualitiy Control and Verification; https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/pdf/1_Volume1/V1_6_Ch6_QA_QC.pdf )]