meta data for this page
  •  

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
general:quality_verification:start [2025/04/11 10:19] – [Verification activities] kotzullageneral:quality_verification:start [2025/04/16 08:31] (current) – kotzulla
Line 104: Line 104:
 Within the QSE framework, a concept was developed that defines binding responsibilities inside the German Environment Agency for the implementation of the necessary QC and QA measures. Within the QSE framework, a concept was developed that defines binding responsibilities inside the German Environment Agency for the implementation of the necessary QC and QA measures.
  
-The purpose of defining roles and responsibilities is to facilitate the effective information exchange and the directive-conformal execution of QC and QA. The following roles are also used for reporting under CLRTAP (but are not yet established on a mandatory basis).+The purpose of defining roles and responsibilities is to facilitate the effective information exchange and the directive-conformal execution of QC and QA.  
 + 
 +The following roles are also used for reporting under CLRTAP but not yet on the same mandatory basis as established for GHG reporting.
  
 <WRAP center round info 60%> <WRAP center round info 60%>
Line 144: Line 146:
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
  
 +<WRAP center round info 60%> 
 +**QSE co-ordinator (QSEK)**\\ 
 +  * member of the Single National Entity 
 +  * tasks: co-ordination of entire QSE and QA/QC activities; provision of QSE checklists. 
 +</WRAP>
 ==== Current workflow management ==== ==== Current workflow management ====
  
 The workflow specified by the QSE is also applied for activity data and, additionally, emission factors for NFR 3 - Agriculture. However, in contrast to UNFCCC GHG reporting, no administrative agreement with the data-providing institution is in place yet. The workflow specified by the QSE is also applied for activity data and, additionally, emission factors for NFR 3 - Agriculture. However, in contrast to UNFCCC GHG reporting, no administrative agreement with the data-providing institution is in place yet.
  
-Moreover, these parts of the adopted design are altered to serve the purposes of UNECE/CLRTAP reporting in the present state. For example, FV are currently responsible for compiling, entry (into the CSE data base) and, if necessary, the calculating of activity data but, in contrast to GHG reporting under UNFCCC, mostly not for compiling of emission factors. +Moreover, these parts of the adopted design are altered to serve the purposes of UNECE/CLRTAP reporting in the present state. For example, FVs are currently responsible for compiling, entry (into the CSE data base) and, if necessary, the calculating of activity data but, in contrast to GHG reporting under UNFCCC, not for compiling of emission factors. 
-{{  :general:quality_verification:grafik_qcqa_roles-responsibilities.png?700  }}+ 
 +{{  :general:quality_verification:qaqc-roles_workflow.png?700  }} 
 Figure: QSE – Roles, responsibilities and workflow Figure: QSE – Roles, responsibilities and workflow
  
Line 174: Line 182:
 More intense peer reviews are undertaken whenever necessary and are performed by national experts and, in most cases, conducted by means of a national workshop. More intense peer reviews are undertaken whenever necessary and are performed by national experts and, in most cases, conducted by means of a national workshop.
  
-As mentioned above, as all activity data (except for the handling of bulk products) are also applied for UNFCCC-Reporting, the same QA procedures are already in force for activity data within the UNECE reporting.+As mentioned above, as all activity data (except for the handling of bulk products) are also applied for UNFCCC reporting, the same QA procedures are already in force for activity data within the UNECE reporting.