meta data for this page
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| sector:agriculture:agricultural_soils:start [2025/04/28 16:28] – [Emission factors] tarakji | sector:agriculture:agricultural_soils:start [2025/04/28 16:31] (current) – [3.D.a.2.a - Animal manure applied to soils] tarakji | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 119: | Line 119: | ||
| ===== 3.D.a.2.a - Animal manure applied to soils ===== | ===== 3.D.a.2.a - Animal manure applied to soils ===== | ||
| - | In this sub-category Germany reports the NH< | + | In this sub-category Germany reports the NH< |
| Germany uses the Tier 2 methodology for estimating NMVOC emissions for cattle in sector 3.B (manure management). The use of this methodology yields NMVOC emissions which formally could be reported in the sectors 3.D.a.2.a and 3.D.a.3 (grazing emissions). However, to be congruent with the NMVOC emissions for other animal categories, Germany reports these emissions in the NMVOC emissions reported from manure management (3.B). For the NFR codes 3.D.a.2.a and 3.D.a.3 the notation key IE is used for NMVOC emissions. | Germany uses the Tier 2 methodology for estimating NMVOC emissions for cattle in sector 3.B (manure management). The use of this methodology yields NMVOC emissions which formally could be reported in the sectors 3.D.a.2.a and 3.D.a.3 (grazing emissions). However, to be congruent with the NMVOC emissions for other animal categories, Germany reports these emissions in the NMVOC emissions reported from manure management (3.B). For the NFR codes 3.D.a.2.a and 3.D.a.3 the notation key IE is used for NMVOC emissions. | ||
| Line 126: | Line 126: | ||
| The calculation of the amount of N in manure applied is based on the N mass flow approach (see 3.B). It is the total of N excreted by animals in the housing and the N imported with bedding material minus N losses by emissions of N species from housing and storage. Hence, the amount of total N includes the N contained in anaerobically digested manures to be applied to the field. | The calculation of the amount of N in manure applied is based on the N mass flow approach (see 3.B). It is the total of N excreted by animals in the housing and the N imported with bedding material minus N losses by emissions of N species from housing and storage. Hence, the amount of total N includes the N contained in anaerobically digested manures to be applied to the field. | ||
| - | The frequencies of application techniques and incorporation times as well as the underlying data sources are described in Rösemann et al. (2025) ((Rösemann, | + | The frequencies of application techniques and incorporation times as well as the underlying data sources are described in Rösemann et al. (2025) ((Rösemann, |
| __Table 5: AD for the estimation of NH< | __Table 5: AD for the estimation of NH< | ||
| Line 154: | Line 154: | ||
| These differences are predominantly caused by a higher estimate of manure N, which is applied, compared to the last submission. Many of the recalculations have an effect on this. The two most important ones are **No. 3** (lower NH< | These differences are predominantly caused by a higher estimate of manure N, which is applied, compared to the last submission. Many of the recalculations have an effect on this. The two most important ones are **No. 3** (lower NH< | ||
| - | Further details on recalculations are described in Rösemann et al. (2025) ((Rösemann, | + | Further details on recalculations are described in Rösemann et al. (2025) ((Rösemann, |
| __Table 7: Comparison of NH< | __Table 7: Comparison of NH< | ||
| Line 173: | Line 173: | ||
| ===== 3.D.a.2.b – Sewage sludge applied to soils ===== | ===== 3.D.a.2.b – Sewage sludge applied to soils ===== | ||
| - | The calculation of NH< | + | The calculation of NH< |
| ==== Activity data ==== | ==== Activity data ==== | ||