meta data for this page
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| sector:agriculture:manure_management:start [2025/02/25 10:48] – [Method] niebuhr | sector:agriculture:manure_management:start [2025/02/25 11:29] (current) – [Table] niebuhr | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 231: | Line 231: | ||
| == Recalculations == | == Recalculations == | ||
| - | All timeseries of the emission inventory have completely been recalculated. Tables | + | All timeseries of the emission inventory have completely been recalculated. Tables |
| For NH3 there are two main reasons for very different emissions compared to last year’s submission: the new emission factors for housing systems **(recalculation No. 3)** results in significantly lower emissions for cattle housing systems and slightly lower emissions for pig housing systems. The correction of the numbers of horses **(recalculation No. 4)** more than doubles the emissions of the other animals. Many of the other recalculations have much smaller effects, see main page of the agricultural sector). Overall the opposing changes partially cancel each other out and result in slightly higher emissions up to 2014 and slightly lower emissions thereafter compared with last year’s submission. | For NH3 there are two main reasons for very different emissions compared to last year’s submission: the new emission factors for housing systems **(recalculation No. 3)** results in significantly lower emissions for cattle housing systems and slightly lower emissions for pig housing systems. The correction of the numbers of horses **(recalculation No. 4)** more than doubles the emissions of the other animals. Many of the other recalculations have much smaller effects, see main page of the agricultural sector). Overall the opposing changes partially cancel each other out and result in slightly higher emissions up to 2014 and slightly lower emissions thereafter compared with last year’s submission. | ||
| Line 239: | Line 239: | ||
| - | __Table 4: REC-1: Revised | + | __Table 4: Comparison of NH< |
| | **NFR TOTAL EMISSIONS** | | **NFR TOTAL EMISSIONS** | ||
| | | **Submission** | | | **Submission** | ||
| Line 246: | Line 246: | ||
| | ::: ^ previous | | ::: ^ previous | ||
| | ::: ^ absolute change | | ::: ^ absolute change | ||
| - | | ::: ^ relative change [%] | 1.33 | 2.69 | 1.59 | 1.57 | 0.73 | -0.06 | -0.16 | -0.15 | -0.08 | -0.11 | -0.09 | -0.23 | -0.65 | + | | ::: ^ relative change [%] | 1.34 | 2.77 | 1.62 | 1.60 | 0.73 | -0.06 | -0.16 | -0.15 | -0.08 | -0.11 | -0.09 | -0.23 | -0.65 |
| | | | | | | | | ||
| | dairy cattle | | dairy cattle | ||
| Line 260: | Line 260: | ||
| \\ | \\ | ||
| - | __Table 5: REC-2: Revised | + | __Table 5: Comparison of NO< |
| | **NFR TOTAL EMISSIONS** | | **NFR TOTAL EMISSIONS** | ||
| | | **Submission** | | | **Submission** | ||
| Line 267: | Line 267: | ||
| | ::: ^ previous | | ::: ^ previous | ||
| | ::: ^ absolute change | | ::: ^ absolute change | ||
| - | | ::: ^ relative change [%] | | + | | ::: ^ relative change [%] | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ||
| | dairy cattle | | dairy cattle | ||
| Line 334: | Line 334: | ||
| === Recalculations === | === Recalculations === | ||
| - | All timeseries of the emission inventory have completely been recalculated. Table REC-3 compares the recalculated time series of the NMVOC emissions from 3.B with the respective data of last year’s submission. The recalculated total emissions are higher. For dairy cattle and other cattle emissions are higher due to changes of NH3 emissions which have impact on the Tier 2 methodology which is applied for cattle NMVOC emissions. For other animals the emissions are also higher. This is largely due to the correction of horse headcounts (**recalculation No. 4**). The new animal numbers for poultry and goats in 2021 and 2022 (**recalculation No. 15**) have a smaller effect., see main page of the agricultural sector). Further details on recalculations are described in Rösemann et al. (2025), Chapter 1.3. | + | All timeseries of the emission inventory have completely been recalculated. Table 7 compares the recalculated time series of the NMVOC emissions from 3.B with the respective data of last year’s submission. The recalculated total emissions are higher. For dairy cattle and other cattle emissions are higher due to changes of NH3 emissions which have impact on the Tier 2 methodology which is applied for cattle NMVOC emissions. For other animals the emissions are also higher. This is largely due to the correction of horse headcounts (**recalculation No. 4**). The new animal numbers for poultry and goats in 2021 and 2022 (**recalculation No. 15**) have a smaller effect., see main page of the agricultural sector). Further details on recalculations are described in Rösemann et al. (2025), Chapter 1.3. |
| - | __Table 7: REC-3: Revised | + | __Table 7: Comparison of NMVOC emissions |
| - | | **NFR TOTAL EMISSIONS** | + | | **NFR TOTAL EMISSIONS** |
| - | | | **Submission** | + | | | **Submission** |
| - | | | | + | | | |
| - | | Total ^ current | + | | Total ^ current |
| - | | ::: ^ previous | + | | ::: ^ previous |
| - | | ::: ^ absolute change | + | | ::: ^ absolute change |
| - | | ::: ^ relative change [%] | | + | | ::: ^ relative change [%] | |
| - | | | | | + | | | | |
| - | | dairy cattle | + | | dairy cattle |
| - | | ::: ^ previous | + | | ::: ^ previous |
| - | | other cattle | + | | other cattle |
| - | | ::: ^ previous | + | | ::: ^ previous |
| - | | other animals | + | | other animals |
| - | | ::: ^ previous | + | | ::: ^ previous |
| === Planned improvements === | === Planned improvements === | ||
| Line 436: | Line 436: | ||
| ==== Recalculations ==== | ==== Recalculations ==== | ||
| - | The following table shows the effects of recalculations on emissions of particulate matter. Visible differences occur in every year, these are largely due to the correction of the numbers of horses (**recalculation No. 4**). The new animal numbers for poultry and goats in 2021 and 2022 (**recalculation No. 15**) shows a smaller effect. See [[sector: | + | The following table 9 shows the effects of recalculations on emissions of particulate matter. Visible differences occur in every year, these are largely due to the correction of the numbers of horses (**recalculation No. 4**). The new animal numbers for poultry and goats in 2021 and 2022 (**recalculation No. 15**) shows a smaller effect. See [[sector: |
| - | __Table 9: REC-4: Revised | + | __Table 9: Comparison of particle emissions (TSP, PM< |
| | ^ Submission | | ^ Submission | ||
| | | | | ||
| Line 445: | Line 445: | ||
| | ::: ^ previous | | ::: ^ previous | ||
| | ::: ^ absolute change | | ::: ^ absolute change | ||
| - | | ::: ^ relative change [%] | 0.61 | 0.90 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.67 | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.11 | -0.90 | + | | ::: ^ relative change [%] | 0.61 | 0.91 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.11 | -0.89 |
| | | | | ||
| | **PM< | | **PM< | ||
| | ::: ^ previous | | ::: ^ previous | ||
| | ::: ^ absolute change | | ::: ^ absolute change | ||
| - | | ::: ^ relative change [%] | 0.98 | 1.37 | 1.08 | 1.11 | 0.99 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.96 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 1.03 | -0.18 | -1.73 | + | | ::: ^ relative change [%] | 0.99 | 1.39 | 1.09 | 1.12 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.99 | 1.01 | 1.04 | -0.18 | -1.70 |
| | | | | ||
| | **PM< | | **PM< | ||
| | ::: ^ previous | | ::: ^ previous | ||
| | ::: ^ absolute change | | ::: ^ absolute change | ||
| - | | ::: ^ relative change [%] | 1.76 | 2.47 | 2.11 | 2.29 | 2.08 | 1.98 | 1.98 | 2.01 | 2.06 | 2.11 | 2.17 | 1.67 | 1.06 | | | + | | ::: ^ relative change [%] | 1.79 | 2.53 | 2.15 | 2.34 | 2.12 | 2.02 | 2.02 | 2.05 | 2.10 | 2.16 | 2.22 | 1.70 | 1.07 | | |
| <WRAP center round info 65%> | <WRAP center round info 65%> | ||