meta data for this page
  •  

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
sector:other_and_natural_sources:natural_sources:other [2025/04/11 07:49] – [Short description] kotzullasector:other_and_natural_sources:natural_sources:other [2025/04/24 14:05] (current) – [Emission Trend] kotzulla
Line 56: Line 56:
  
 __Table 1: Annual number of lightning strikes in Germany, as 1990, in [1,000 strikes]__ __Table 1: Annual number of lightning strikes in Germany, as 1990, in [1,000 strikes]__
- 1990   443    | +^ 1990  ^ 1995  ^  2000    2005  ^  2010   2011  ^  2012  ^  2013  ^  2014   2015   2016   2017   2018   2019   2020  ^  2021  ^  2022   2023  ^ 
-^  1995   394    | +|  443  |  394  |  1,026  |  802    589   |  687    656   |  542    623   |  550    432   |  443   |  446    329   |  399   |  512   |  242   |  316   |
-^  2000   1,026  +
-^  2005   802    | +
-^  2010   589    | +
- 2011   687    | +
- 2012   656    | +
- 2013   542    | +
- 2014   623    | +
-^  2015   550    | +
-|  2016  |  432    | +
-|  2017  |  443    | +
-|  2018  |  446    | +
-|  2019  |  329    | +
- 2020   399    | +
-|  2021  |  512    | +
-|  2022  |  242    | +
-^  2023  |  316    |+
  
 ===Emission factor(s)=== ===Emission factor(s)===
Line 85: Line 69:
 Figure 1: NFR 11.C, NO<sub>x</sub> emissions from lightning Figure 1: NFR 11.C, NO<sub>x</sub> emissions from lightning
  
-{{ :sector:natural_sources:11c_nox_from_lightning.png?nolink&600 |}}+{{ :sector:natural_sources:11c_nox_from_lightning.png?nolink&800 Annual nitrogen oxides emissions from lightning over Germany.}}
  
 ===== Recalculations ===== ===== Recalculations =====
Line 96: Line 80:
 The AD from BLIDS does have a low uncertainty of ± 3%. The uncertainties for the emission factors are estimated to be relatively high, being a default value. Hence the overall uncertainty for the emission estimation of NO<sub>x</sub> from lightning is qualified estimated by expert judgement to be high (>50%). The AD from BLIDS does have a low uncertainty of ± 3%. The uncertainties for the emission factors are estimated to be relatively high, being a default value. Hence the overall uncertainty for the emission estimation of NO<sub>x</sub> from lightning is qualified estimated by expert judgement to be high (>50%).
  
-====Quality checks==== 
- 
-No sector-specific quality checks are done. 
  
 ====Planned Improvement==== ====Planned Improvement====