meta data for this page
  •  

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
sector:other_and_natural_sources:natural_sources:other [2025/04/16 09:10] – kotzullasector:other_and_natural_sources:natural_sources:other [2025/04/24 14:05] (current) – [Emission Trend] kotzulla
Line 58: Line 58:
 ^ 1990  ^ 1995  ^  2000   ^  2005  ^  2010  ^  2011  ^  2012  ^  2013  ^  2014  ^  2015  ^  2016  ^  2017  ^  2018  ^  2019  ^  2020  ^  2021  ^  2022  ^  2023  ^ ^ 1990  ^ 1995  ^  2000   ^  2005  ^  2010  ^  2011  ^  2012  ^  2013  ^  2014  ^  2015  ^  2016  ^  2017  ^  2018  ^  2019  ^  2020  ^  2021  ^  2022  ^  2023  ^
 |  443  |  394  |  1,026  |  802   |  589   |  687   |  656   |  542   |  623   |  550   |  432   |  443   |  446   |  329   |  399   |  512   |  242   |  316   | |  443  |  394  |  1,026  |  802   |  589   |  687   |  656   |  542   |  623   |  550   |  432   |  443   |  446   |  329   |  399   |  512   |  242   |  316   |
-^  1990  ^  443    ^ 
-^  1995  ^  394    ^ 
-^  2000  ^  1,026  ^ 
-^  2005  ^  802    ^ 
-^  2010  ^  589    ^ 
-|  2011  |  687    | 
-|  2012  |  656    | 
-|  2013  |  542    | 
-|  2014  |  623    | 
-^  2015  ^  550    ^ 
-|  2016  |  432    | 
-|  2017  |  443    | 
-|  2018  |  446    | 
-|  2019  |  329    | 
-^  2020  ^  399    ^ 
-|  2021  |  512    | 
-|  2022  |  242    | 
-^  2023  ^  316    ^ 
  
 ===Emission factor(s)=== ===Emission factor(s)===
Line 87: Line 69:
 Figure 1: NFR 11.C, NO<sub>x</sub> emissions from lightning Figure 1: NFR 11.C, NO<sub>x</sub> emissions from lightning
  
-{{ :sector:natural_sources:11c_nox_from_lightning.png?nolink&600 |}}+{{ :sector:natural_sources:11c_nox_from_lightning.png?nolink&800 | Annual nitrogen oxides emissions from lightning over Germany.}}
  
 ===== Recalculations ===== ===== Recalculations =====
Line 98: Line 80:
 The AD from BLIDS does have a low uncertainty of ± 3%. The uncertainties for the emission factors are estimated to be relatively high, being a default value. Hence the overall uncertainty for the emission estimation of NO<sub>x</sub> from lightning is qualified estimated by expert judgement to be high (>50%). The AD from BLIDS does have a low uncertainty of ± 3%. The uncertainties for the emission factors are estimated to be relatively high, being a default value. Hence the overall uncertainty for the emission estimation of NO<sub>x</sub> from lightning is qualified estimated by expert judgement to be high (>50%).
  
-====Quality checks==== 
- 
-No sector-specific quality checks are done. 
  
 ====Planned Improvement==== ====Planned Improvement====