meta data for this page
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
sector:other_and_natural_sources:other_sources:pets [2023/10/05 12:59] – [Methodology] kotzulla | sector:other_and_natural_sources:other_sources:pets [2025/03/28 10:35] (current) – [Emission Trend] niebuhr | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
====Short description ==== | ====Short description ==== | ||
- | ^ NFR-Code ^ Name of category | + | In addition to non-agricultural sources |
- | | 6.A.2 | **Ammonia | + | |
+ | This emission source ist taken into account for the first time with the current submission and with dogs and cats as the only two groups of pets covered so far. | ||
- | In addition to non-agricultural sources of ammonia (NH< | + | ^ Category Code |
+ | | 6.A.2 | T1 | NS | D | | ||
+ | | {{page> | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | | NO< | ||
+ | | NA | ||
+ | | {{page> | ||
==== Methodology ==== | ==== Methodology ==== | ||
- | Ammonia emissions from pets are calculated for the first time and based on the methodological description of Sutton et al. (2000) ((Sutton, M.A., U. Dragosits, Y.S. Tang & D. Fowler, 2000. Ammonia emissions from non-agricultural sources in the UK. Atmospheric Environment 34 (2000), 855–869.))and the Guidebook 2023 ((EMEP/EEA Guidebook 2023, Chapter 6, https:// | + | Ammonia emissions from pets have been calculated for the first time in submission 2024 and are based on the methodological description of Sutton et al. (2000) ((Sutton, M.A., U. Dragosits, Y.S. Tang & D. Fowler, 2000. Ammonia emissions from non-agricultural sources in the UK. Atmospheric Environment 34 (2000), 855–869.))and the Guidebook 2023 ((EMEP/EEA Guidebook 2023, Chapter 6, https:// |
- | <WRAP center round info 50%> | + | <WRAP center round info 40%> |
- | **EM** = **AD** | + | <m>EM = AD_(number of pets) * EF_(kg ammonia per animal |
</ | </ | ||
===Activity data === | ===Activity data === | ||
- | As there are no official statistics on pets in Germany, data of a representative | + | As there are no official statistics on pets in Germany, data from repeated |
The latest EMEP EEA Guidebook refers to European statistics. | The latest EMEP EEA Guidebook refers to European statistics. | ||
The figures for 2021 and 2022 are consistent with those in the publication mentioned above and according to the 2023 Guidebook only the main categories cats (39% by animal catory) and dogs (27% by animal catory) were considered. | The figures for 2021 and 2022 are consistent with those in the publication mentioned above and according to the 2023 Guidebook only the main categories cats (39% by animal catory) and dogs (27% by animal catory) were considered. | ||
- | Time series for the main animal | + | Time series for the main categories of pets are obtained by the numbers of the survey for the years 2012 to 2023. |
Data for 1990 are estimated retrospectively using the number of households (see also [[https:// | Data for 1990 are estimated retrospectively using the number of households (see also [[https:// | ||
Line 50: | Line 56: | ||
^ 2020 ^ 15.70 ^ 10.70 ^ | ^ 2020 ^ 15.70 ^ 10.70 ^ | ||
| 2021 | 16.70 | 10.30 | | | 2021 | 16.70 | 10.30 | | ||
- | ^ | + | | |
+ | | 2023 | 15.70 | 10.50 | | ||
Line 64: | Line 71: | ||
====Emission Trend==== | ====Emission Trend==== | ||
- | The following figure shows the development of emissions for the pet-categories dogs (EM< | + | The following figure shows the development of emissions for the pet-categories dogs (EM< |
- | + | ||
- | In recent years, an increasing trend can be observed, resulting in a mean value (between 2020 to 2022) of NH< | + | |
- | + | ||
- | Figure 1: Ammonia emissions from pets | + | |
- | + | ||
- | {{ : | + | |
+ | {{ : | ||
+ | In recent years, an increasing trend can be observed, resulting in a mean value (between 2020 to 2023) of 9.9 kt NH< | ||
===== Recalculations ===== | ===== Recalculations ===== | ||
- | <WRAP center round info 60%> | + | <WRAP center round info 65%> |
- | No specific | + | As these **emissions are reported for the first time**, no recalculations occur against the previous submission. |
</ | </ | ||
Line 82: | Line 85: | ||
==== Uncertainties ==== | ==== Uncertainties ==== | ||
- | For pets the uncertainty of the animal numbers is assumed to be 5 % (standard error), and hence 10 % for half the 95 % confidence interval, with normal distribution. | + | For pets the uncertainty of the animal numbers is assumed to be 5% (standard error), and hence 10% for half the 95% confidence interval, with normal distribution. |
+ | |||
+ | There is no information on the uncertainty of the emission factors. | ||
+ | However, as EF vary between different sources and the amount of ammonia volatilized is based on an assumption, EF uncertainties are expected to be relatively high. | ||
+ | Therefore, | ||
====Planned Improvement==== | ====Planned Improvement==== | ||
- | Currently, no improvements are planned. | + | <WRAP center round info 60%> |
+ | Currently, no source-specific | ||
+ | </ | ||