meta data for this page
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
sector:other_and_natural_sources:other_sources:pets [2024/04/19 09:44] – [Short description] kotzulla | sector:other_and_natural_sources:other_sources:pets [2025/03/28 10:35] (current) – [Emission Trend] niebuhr | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
====Short description ==== | ====Short description ==== | ||
- | In addition to non-agricultural sources of ammonia (NH< | + | In addition to non-agricultural sources of ammonia (NH< |
- | ^ | + | This emission source ist taken into account for the first time with the current submission and with dogs and cats as the only two groups of pets covered so far. |
+ | |||
+ | ^ | ||
| 6.A.2 | T1 | NS | D | | | 6.A.2 | T1 | NS | D | | ||
| {{page> | | {{page> | ||
\\ | \\ | ||
- | | NO< | + | | NO< |
- | | NA | + | | NA |
- | | {{page> | + | | {{page> |
==== Methodology ==== | ==== Methodology ==== | ||
- | Ammonia emissions from pets are calculated for the first time and based on the methodological description of Sutton et al. (2000) ((Sutton, M.A., U. Dragosits, Y.S. Tang & D. Fowler, 2000. Ammonia emissions from non-agricultural sources in the UK. Atmospheric Environment 34 (2000), 855–869.))and the Guidebook 2023 ((EMEP/EEA Guidebook 2023, Chapter 6, https:// | + | Ammonia emissions from pets have been calculated for the first time in submission 2024 and are based on the methodological description of Sutton et al. (2000) ((Sutton, M.A., U. Dragosits, Y.S. Tang & D. Fowler, 2000. Ammonia emissions from non-agricultural sources in the UK. Atmospheric Environment 34 (2000), 855–869.))and the Guidebook 2023 ((EMEP/EEA Guidebook 2023, Chapter 6, https:// |
Line 24: | Line 26: | ||
===Activity data === | ===Activity data === | ||
- | As there are no official statistics on pets in Germany, data from repeated representative surveys of 5.000 to 7.000 households conducted on behalf of the German Pet Food Association (Industrieverband Heimtierbedarf e.V., IVH, and the Zentralverband Zoologischer Fachbetriebe Deutschlands e.V., ZZF)(([[https:// | + | As there are no official statistics on pets in Germany, data from repeated representative surveys of 5.000 to 7.000 households conducted on behalf of the German Pet Food Association (Industrieverband Heimtierbedarf e.V., IVH, and the Zentralverband Zoologischer Fachbetriebe Deutschlands e.V., ZZF)(([[https:// |
The latest EMEP EEA Guidebook refers to European statistics. | The latest EMEP EEA Guidebook refers to European statistics. | ||
The figures for 2021 and 2022 are consistent with those in the publication mentioned above and according to the 2023 Guidebook only the main categories cats (39% by animal catory) and dogs (27% by animal catory) were considered. | The figures for 2021 and 2022 are consistent with those in the publication mentioned above and according to the 2023 Guidebook only the main categories cats (39% by animal catory) and dogs (27% by animal catory) were considered. | ||
- | Time series for the main categories of pets are obtained by the numbers of the survey for the years 2012 to 2022. | + | Time series for the main categories of pets are obtained by the numbers of the survey for the years 2012 to 2023. |
Data for 1990 are estimated retrospectively using the number of households (see also [[https:// | Data for 1990 are estimated retrospectively using the number of households (see also [[https:// | ||
Line 54: | Line 56: | ||
^ 2020 ^ 15.70 ^ 10.70 ^ | ^ 2020 ^ 15.70 ^ 10.70 ^ | ||
| 2021 | 16.70 | 10.30 | | | 2021 | 16.70 | 10.30 | | ||
- | ^ | + | | |
+ | | 2023 | 15.70 | 10.50 | | ||
Line 72: | Line 75: | ||
{{ : | {{ : | ||
- | In recent years, an increasing trend can be observed, resulting in a mean value (between 2020 to 2022) of 9.92 kt NH< | + | In recent years, an increasing trend can be observed, resulting in a mean value (between 2020 to 2023) of 9.9 kt NH< |
===== Recalculations ===== | ===== Recalculations ===== | ||